The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence Supporting LI-RADS Major Features for CT- and MR Imaging–based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) standardizes the interpretation, reporting, and data collection for imaging examinations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It assigns category codes reflecting relative probability of HCC to imaging-detected liver observations based on major and ancillary imaging features. LI-RADS also includes imaging features suggesting malignancy other than HCC. Supported and endorsed by the American College of Radiology (ACR), the system has been developed by a committee of radiologists, hepatologists, pathologists, surgeons, lexicon experts, and ACR staff, with input from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the Organ Procurement Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing. Development of LI-RADS has been based on literature review, expert opinion, rounds of testing and iteration, and feedback from users. This article summarizes and assesses the quality of evidence supporting each LI-RADS major feature for diagnosis of HCC, as well as of the LI-RADS imaging features suggesting malignancy other than HCC. Based on the evidence, recommendations are provided for or against their continued inclusion in LI-RADS. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma
Galle, P. R., Forner, A., Llovet, J. M., Mazzaferro, V., Piscaglia, F., Raoul, J.-L., Schirmacher, P., & Vilgrain, V. (2018) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019 · Cited by 11,406
Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Update Δσ
Bruix, J., & Sherman, M. (2011) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.24199 · Cited by 8,103
EASL–EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma
European Association for the Study of the Liver, & European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (2012) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.001 · Cited by 5,218
AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
Heimbach, J. K., Kulik, L. M., Finn, R. S., Sirlin, C. B., Abecassis, M. M., Roberts, L. R., Zhu, A. X., Murad, M. H., & Marrero, J. A. (2018) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.29086 · Cited by 4,070
Self-citationPrimary carcinoma of the liver.A study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies
Edmondson, H. A., & Steiner, P. E. (1954) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(195405)7:3<462::aid-cncr2820070308>3.0.co;2-e · Cited by 2,772
(2012) · Hepatogastroenterology · doi:10.5754/hge12404 · Cited by 1,825
Forner, A., Vilana, R., Ayuso, C., Bianchi, L., Solé, M., Ayuso, J. R., Boix, L., Sala, M., Varela, M., Llovet, J. M., et al. (2008) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.21966 · Cited by 1,032
Omata, M., Lesmana, L. A., Tateishi, R., Chen, P.-J., Lin, S.-M., Yoshida, H., Kudo, M., Lee, J. M., Choi, B. I., Poon, R. T. P., et al. (2010) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-010-9165-7 · Cited by 1,026
Cited by
AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
Singal, A. G., Llovet, J. M., Yarchoan, M., Mehta, N., Heimbach, J. K., Dawson, L. A., Jou, J. H., Kulik, L. M., Agopian, V. G., Marrero, J. A., et al. (2023) · Hepatology · doi:10.1097/hep.0000000000000466 · Cited by 2,052
“[103,112] LI-RADS categorizes liver nodules on a scale from LR-1 (benign) to LR-5 (HCC).”
Systematic Review of the Literature: Best Practices
Gupta, S., Rajiah, P., Middlebrooks, E. H., Baruah, D., Carter, B. W., Burton, K. R., Chatterjee, A. R., & Miller, M. M. (2018) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2018.04.025 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, A., Bashir, M. R., Corwin, M. T., Cruite, I., Dietrich, C. F., Do, R. K. G., Ehman, E. C., Fowler, K. J., Hussain, H. K., Jha, R. C., Karam, A. R., Mamidipalli, A., Marks, R. M., Mitchell, D. G., Morgan, T. A., Ohliger, M. A., Shah, A., Vu, K.-N., Sirlin, C. B., & For the LI-RADS Evidence Working Group
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-48
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2769505173
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence Supporting LI-RADS Major Features for CT- and MR Imaging–based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2017170554
- The paper
- Tang, A., Bashir, M. R., Corwin, M. T., Cruite, I., Dietrich, C. F., Do, R. K. G., Ehman, E. C., Fowler, K. J., Hussain, H. K., Jha, R. C., Karam, A. R., Mamidipalli, A., Marks, R. M., Mitchell, D. G., Morgan, T. A., Ohliger, M. A., Shah, A., Vu, K.-N., Sirlin, C. B., & For the LI-RADS Evidence Working Group. (2018). Evidence Supporting LI-RADS Major Features for CT- and MR Imaging–based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
