Cited by 13Enzyme Production and CharacterizationAdvanced Scientific Research MethodsOptimal Experimental Design Methods

Statistical optimization of culture conditions for milk-clotting enzyme production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens using wheat bran-an agro-industry waste

Open access
Zhang, Weibing, He, Xiaoling, Liu, Hongna, Guo, Huiyuan, Ren, Fazheng, Wen, Pengcheng·2013·Indian Journal of Microbiology

Abstract

In order to improve the production of the milk-clotting enzyme under submerged fermentation, two statistical methods were applied to optimize the culture conditions of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens D4 using wheat bran as nutrient source. First, initial pH, agitation speed, and fermentation time were shown to have significant effects on D4 enzyme production using the Plackett-Burman experimental design. Subsequently, optimal conditions were obtained using the Box-Behnken method, which were as follows: initial pH 7.57, agitation speed 241 rpm, fermentation time 53.3 h. Under these conditions, the milk-clotting enzyme production was remarkably enhanced. The milk-clotting enzyme activity reached 1996.9 SU/mL, which was 2.92-fold higher than that of the initial culture conditions, showing that the Plackett-Burman design and Box-Behnken response surface method are effective to optimize culture conditions. The research can provide a reference for full utilization of wheat bran and the production of milk-clotting enzyme by B. amyloliquefaciens D4 under submerged fermentation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12088-013-0391-2

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wheat bran provides an excellent medium for microbial growth and enzyme biosynthesis because it is a nutrient-rich material containing about 15% protein, along with cellulose, starch, and trace minerals.

    “In contrast, MCE production is inhibited by inorganic nitrogen sources as a nutrientrich material containing ~15% protein; along with cellulose, starch, and trace minerals, wheat bran provides an excellent medium for microbial growth and enzyme biosynthesis (Zhang et al., 2013).”

    From Invited review: Milk-clotting enzymes of microbial origin and their role in cheesemaking-A review. (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2013

    The passage on wheat bran (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) says it contains cellulose, starch, crude protein, and trace elements that can promote microbial growth and enzyme production. It does not give the claimed protein content of about 15%. The cited paper also does not establish the citing sentence’s separate assertion that inorganic nitrogen sources inhibit MCE production. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The highest concentrations of milk-clotting enzyme from Bacillus licheniformis and Amylomyces rouxii were obtained when the initial pH of the medium was set at 7.0, and from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens when the initial pH was 7.6.

    “Furthermore, in the study by Yu and Chou (2005; for B. licheniformis and Amylomyces rouxii) and Zhang et al. (2013;for B. amyloliquefaciens), the highest concentrations of MCE were obtained when the initial pH of the medium was set at 7.0 and 7.6, respectively.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gan BZ, Song X, He XL, Zhang WB, Li F (2009) Separation and identification of a chymosin producing bacterium from soil of yak grazing district in Tianzhu country of Gansu province. Food Sci 30(11):158-162 (in chinese)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, W., He, X., Liu, H., Guo, H., Ren, F., & Wen, P.
Affiliations
  • Gansu Agricultural University (CN)
  • China Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ren, Fazheng
Venue
Indian Journal of Microbiology
Published
2013-03-21
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
492-495
ISSN
  • 0046-8991 (ISSN-L)
  • 0973-7715
OpenAlex
W2032330374
Cited by
13
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Advanced Scientific Research Methods
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Keywords
milk-clotting enzyme, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, wheat bran, agro-industrial waste utilization, submerged fermentation, culture condition optimization, Plackett-Burman design, Box-Behnken design, initial pH, stirring speed, fermentation time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review