Cited by 6Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies

Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Huang, Fengxiang, Yang, Haiyan, Bao, Wenguang, Bin, Yehong, Zhou, Shengsheng, Wang, Man, Lv, Xiaoping·2023·Clinical and Translational Oncology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) using the most recent data available. METHODS: The literature on the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 versus placebo and/or best supportive care (BSC) in mCRC was obtained through a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases through January 2023. Identify the included literature and extract pertinent data, such as the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), disease control rate (DCR), incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: There were eight eligible articles that included 2903 patients (1964 TAS-102 versus 939 Placebo and/or BSC). In this meta-analysis, TAS-102 treatment resulted in longer OS, PFS, TTF, and higher DCR in patients with mCRC versus placebo and/or BSC. TAS-102 improved OS and PFS in subgroup analyses of mCRC patients with KRAS wild-type and KRAS mutant-type. In addition, TAS-102 did not increase the incidence of serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: TAS-102 can enhance the prognosis of mCRC patients whose standard therapy has failed, regardless of KRAS mutation status, and its safety is acceptable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12094-023-03268-5

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, F., Yang, H., Bao, W., Bin, Y., Zhou, S., Wang, M., & Lv, X.
Affiliations
First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lv, Xiaoping
Venue
Clinical and Translational Oncology
Published
2023-07-07
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
468-476
ISSN
  • 1699-048X (ISSN-L)
  • 1699-3055
OpenAlex
W4383481127
Cited by
6
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical & Translational Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81860104)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (2017GXNSFAA198299)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Keywords
trifluridine/tipiracil, metastatic colorectal cancer, overall survival, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, disease control rate, adverse events, KRAS mutation status, second-line therapy
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Colonic Neoplasms, Drug Combinations, Humans, Pyrrolidines, Rectal Neoplasms, Thymine, Trifluridine, Uracil, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review