Cited by 18Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Impact of KRASG12 mutations on survival with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: Post hoc analysis of the phase III SUNLIGHT trial

Open access
Tabernero, J., Taieb, J., Fakih, M., Prager, G.W., Van Cutsem, E., Ciardiello, F., Mayer, R.J., Amellal, N. +3 more·2024·ESMO Open

Abstract

Background In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), KRAS mutations are often associated with poorer survival; however, the prognostic impact of specific point mutations is unclear. In the phase III SUNLIGHT trial, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus FTD/TPI alone. We assessed the impact of KRAS G12 mutational status on OS in SUNLIGHT. Patients and methods In the global, open-label, randomized, phase III SUNLIGHT trial, adults with mCRC who had received no more than two prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized 1 : 1 to receive FTD/TPI alone or FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab. In this post hoc analysis, OS was assessed according to the presence or absence of a KRAS G12 mutation in the overall population and in patients with RAS -mutated tumors. Results Overall, 450 patients were analyzed, including 302 patients in the RAS mutation subgroup (214 with a KRAS G12 mutation and 88 with a non- KRAS G12 RAS mutation). In the overall population, similar OS outcomes were observed in patients with and without a KRAS G12 mutation [median 8.3 and 9.2 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.4]. Similar OS outcomes were also observed in the subgroup analysis of patients with a KRAS G12 mutation versus those with a non- KRAS G12 RAS mutation (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.76-1.4). FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab improved OS compared with FTD/TPI alone irrespective of KRAS G12 mutational status. Among patients with a KRAS G12 mutation, the median OS was 9.4 months with FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab versus 7.2 months with FTD/TPI alone (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.93), and in patients without a KRAS G12 mutation, the median OS was 11.3 versus 7.1 months, respectively (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.81). Conclusions The presence of a KRAS G12 mutation had no detrimental effect on OS among patients treated in SUNLIGHT. The benefit of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab over FTD/TPI alone was confirmed independently of KRAS G12 status.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102945

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In post hoc analysis of SUNLIGHT, FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab resulted in better overall survival compared to FTD/TPI alone in both RAS mutant and RAS wild-type groups; mOS was 10.1 vs 7.1 months for mRAS and 11.4 vs 7.4 months for wtRAS.

    “The post hoc analysis of the Phase III SUNLIGHT trial demonstrated that FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab treatment resulted in better overall survival compared to FTD/TPI alone in both the RAS mutant and RAS wild-type groups; the median OS (mOS) was 10.1 months vs. 7.1 months for mRAS and 11.4 months vs. 7.4 months for wtRAS, respectively [47].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Tabernero J. Fakih M. Prager G.W. Third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Reply N Engl J Med 389 2023 190 191 37437153

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tabernero, J., Taieb, J., Fakih, M., Prager, G. W., Van Cutsem, E., Ciardiello, F., Mayer, R. J., Amellal, N., Skanji, D., Calleja, E., & Yoshino, T.
Affiliations
  • Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (ES)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (France) (FR)
  • Taiho Oncology (United States) (US)
  • National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP)
Corresponding author
Tabernero, J.
Venue
ESMO Open
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
102945
ISSN
2059-7029 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392639095
Cited by
18
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ESMO Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
Funders
Servier Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
metastatic colorectal cancer, trifluridine/tipiracil, bevacizumab, overall survival, RAS mutations, prognostic factors, combination chemotherapy, predictive biomarkers, anti-VEGF therapy, first-line therapy, neutropenia
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Adult, Colonic Neoplasms, Humans, Mutation, Pyrrolidines, Thymine, Trifluridine, Uracil, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review