Cited by 79Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Human Lactation, Pair-bonds, and Alloparents: A Cross-Cultural Analysis

Quinlan, Robert J., Quinlan, Marsha B.·2008·Human Nature

Abstract

The evolutionary origin of human pair-bonds is uncertain. One hypothesis, supported by data from forgers, suggests that pair-bonds function to provision mothers and dependent offspring during lactation. Similarly, public health data from large-scale industrial societies indicate that single mothers tend to wean their children earlier than do women living with a mate. Here we examine relations between pair-bond stability, alloparenting, and cross-cultural trends in breastfeeding using data from 58 "traditional" societies in the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample (SCCS). Analyses show that stable conjugal relationships were associated with significantly later weaning among the societies in the SCCS. The relationship between pair-bond stability and age at weaning was not mediated by women's ability to provision themselves or women's kin support. Availability of alloparental care was also inversely related to age at weaning, and the association was not significantly reduced after controlling for frequency of divorce. This study indicates that among a woman's kin relationships, a pair-bond with a child's father is especially supportive of breastfeeding. These cross-cultural findings are further evidence that human pair-bonds may have evolved to support lactation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12110-007-9026-9

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A greater number of alloparents increases the likelihood that children will receive consistent, responsive care and experience longer breastfeeding duration, improving child adjustment.

    “A greater number of alloparents increases the likelihood that children will receive consistent, responsive care (Hrdy, 2009a) and experience longer breastfeeding duration (Quinlan and Quinlan, 2008), improving child adjustment (Pianta and Ball, 1993).”

    From The evolved nest, oxytocin functioning, and prosocial development (2023) · cites this paper as Quinlan and Quinlan (2008)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quinlan, R. J., & Quinlan, M. B.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Quinlan, Robert J.
Venue
Human Nature
Published
2007-12-04
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
87-102
ISSN
  • 1045-6767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4776
OpenAlex
W2140229465
Cited by
79
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
pair bond, alloparenting, lactation, breastfeeding, weaning age, kinship support, divorce, conjugal relationships, cross-cultural comparison, kinship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review