Cited by 45Ethics and Social Impacts of AIImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

Ethical Aspects of the Impact of AI: the Status of Humans in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

Rakowski, Roman, Polak, Petr, Kowalikova, Petra·2021·Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12115-021-00586-8

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rakowski, R., Polak, P., & Kowalikova, P.
Affiliations
VSB - Technical University of Ostrava (CZ)
Corresponding author
Rakowski, Roman
Venue
Society
Published
2021-05-26
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
196-203
ISSN
  • 0041-1035 (ISSN-L)
  • 0147-2011
  • 1936-4725
OpenAlex
W3164602523
Cited by
45
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
8.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Society (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace VŠB-TUO (VŠB-TUO) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Technologická Agentura České Republiky (TL01000299)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
AI ethics, human status, automation of routine work, human self-realization, machine autonomy, human control over AI, societal impact of AI, value framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review