Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 27Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological Perspectives of Virtual Child Sexual Abuse Material

Christensen, Larissa S., Moritz, Dominique, Pearson, Ashley·2021·Sexuality & Culture
DOI 10.1007/s12119-021-09820-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12119-021-09820-1

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Avery, L. (2015). The categorical failure of child pornography. Widener Law Review, 21(1), 51–94.
  2. Beech, A.R., & Mann, R.E. (2002). Recent developments in the treatment of sexual offenders. In J. McGuire (Ed.), Offender rehabilitation: Effective programs and policies to reduce reoffending. Chichester: Wiley.
  3. Clarke, R.V. (2008) Situational Crime Prevention. In R. Wortley & L. Mazerolle (Ed.), Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (Chapter 10). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
  4. Eneman, M, Gillespie A.A., & Stahl B.C. (2009) Criminalising fantasies: The regulation of virtual child pornography. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems. https://gup.ub.gu.se/file/207727.
  5. Filipović, A. M. (2020). Video games as a mean of fostering of the interactive relationship between pedophiles and children. In Bjelajac, Ž., & Filipović, A. (Ed.) Pedophilia: Causes and consequences (pp. 41–52). Novi Sad: Culture – Polis Novi Sad.
  6. Krone, T., Smith, R. G., Cartwright, J., Hutchings, A., Tomison, A., & Napier, S. (2017). Online child sexual exploitation offenders: A study of Australian law enforcement data. Canberra: Criminology Research Council.
  7. Maras, M. H., & Shapiro, L. R. (2017). Child sex dolls and robots: More than just an uncanny valley. Journal of Internet Law, 21(5), 3–21.
  8. Northern Ireland Office. (2007). Consultation on the possession of non-photographic visual depictions of child sexual abuse. London: Home Office.
  9. Sullivan, J., & Sheehan, V. (2002). The internet sex offender: Understanding the behaviour and engaging the assessment and treatment issues. Paper presented to the 21st Annual Conference of ATSA (The Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers), Montreal, Canada.

Cited by

See all 27

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Christensen, L. S., Moritz, D., & Pearson, A.
Affiliations
University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
Corresponding author
Christensen, Larissa S.
ORCID
Venue
Sexuality & Culture
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-02-05
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
1353-1365
ISSN
  • 1095-5143 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4822
DOI
10.1007/s12119-021-09820-1
OpenAlex
W3129103771
Cited by
18
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Sexuality & Culture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Law › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
morphing, 3D rendering, cognitive distortions, schemas, person-situation interaction, rational choice theory, offender psychology, law enforcement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.