CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 287Misinformation and Its ImpactsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of High-Anxiety Situations on Conspiracy Thinking

Grzesiak-Feldman, Monika·2013·Current Psychology
DOI 10.1007/s12144-013-9165-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-013-9165-6

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Harris, A. L. (2009). Conspiracy theories in African American Culture: a concept analysis. Journal of Theory Construction and Testing, 13, 16–19.
  2. Kofta, M., & Narkiewicz-Jodko, W. (2001). Wartości a bytowość grupy, stereotypy spiskowe, i uprzedzenia [Values, group entitativity, and conspiracy stereotypes as determinants of prejudice]. In D. Doliński & B. Weilg (Eds.), Od myśli i uczuć do decyzji i działań (pp. 59–74). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Instytutu Psychologii PAN.
  3. Wrześniewski, K., Sosnowski, T., & Matusik, D. (2002). Inwentarz Stanu i Cechy Lęku STAI [The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–287 of 287

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Grzesiak-Feldman, M.
Affiliations
University of Warsaw (PL)
Corresponding author
Grzesiak-Feldman, Monika
Venue
Current Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-01-26
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
100-118
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
DOI
10.1007/s12144-013-9165-6
OpenAlex
W2041615716
Cited by
287
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Uniwersytet Warszawski
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
conspiracy beliefs, anxiety, state anxiety, trait anxiety, situational factors, threat processing, pre-exam anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review