Cited by 2Cancer survivorship and carePsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsArt Therapy and Mental Health

An evaluation of adjuvant psychological therapy (APT) effectiveness on the quality of life of patients with hematologic malignancies

Barani, Masoome, Bakhtiari, Maryam, Firoozabadi, Vahid Sadeghi, Mehdizadeh, Mahshid, Sadeghi, Akram·2019·Current Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-017-9716-3

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barani, M., Bakhtiari, M., Firoozabadi, V. S., Mehdizadeh, M., & Sadeghi, A.
Affiliations
  • Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
  • Taleghani General Hospital (IR)
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
Corresponding author
Firoozabadi, Vahid Sadeghi
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2017-11-15
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
1728-1735
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W4256359918
Cited by
2
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
hematologic malignancies, cancer patients, quality of life, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychological distress, coping with cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review