Cited by 129Environmental Education and SustainabilityPersonality Traits and PsychologyUrban Green Space and Health

Connectedness to nature, personality traits and empathy from a sustainability perspective

Di Fabio, Annamaria, Kenny, Maureen E.·2021·Current Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-018-0031-4

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Fabio, A., & Kenny, M. E.
Affiliations
Boston College (US)
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2018-10-22
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
1095-1106
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W2896423900
Cited by
129
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
17.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
Keywords
nature connection, personality traits, empathy, Big Five personality traits, agreeableness, openness to experience, perspective taking, empathic concern, environmental attitudes, environmental behavior, sustainability, workers, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review