The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/jyj1-4868 · Cited by 10,297
Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.4.3.272 · Cited by 9,587
A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis
Horn, J. L. (1965) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289447 · Cited by 8,714
Sample size in factor analysis.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.4.1.84 · Cited by 5,497
A Second Generation Little Jiffy
Kaiser, H. F. (1970) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291817 · Cited by 4,785
A Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis
Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013) · Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079 · Cited by 3,304
Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.99.3.432 · Cited by 3,129
Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0029315 · Cited by 2,816
How to Use a Monte Carlo Study to Decide on Sample Size and Determine Power
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0904_8 · Cited by 2,362
Cited by
Celik, I. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468 · Cited by 1,012
Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis
Schreiber, J. B. (2021) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.027 · Cited by 565
Unpacking the role of AI ethics online education for science and engineering students
Usher, M., & Barak, M. (2024) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-024-00493-4 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Goretzko, D., Pham, T. T. H., & Bühner, M.
- Venue
- Current Psychology
- Published
- 2019-05-20
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3510-3521
- ISSN
- 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-4733
- OpenAlex
- W2946024010
- Cited by
- 621
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 25.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12144-019-00300-2
- The paper
- Goretzko, D., Pham, T. T. H., & Bühner, M. (2021). Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00300-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
