The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Support and Self-Care of Patients with Heart Failure
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Social support can influence treatment adherence of patients with chronic illnesses, which may explain the positive effects of social support on heart failure (HF) outcomes. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of social support among patients with HF, we examined whether aspects of social support were associated with self-care, including medication adherence, dietary adherence, and HF symptom monitoring functions. METHODS: We recruited 74 patients with HF from cardiology clinics of a Veterans Affairs Medical Center and a university-affiliated hospital, and tested the relationships between social support and the patients' self-care. RESULTS: Consistent with previous research in older adults, family members, especially spouses, were often involved in the medical care of patients with chronic HF and provided a range of levels of support to patients. Self-care was generally poor, as measured across several self-care domains. Perceived social support was moderately associated with relatively better self-reported medication and dietary adherence, and other aspects of self-care such as daily weighing. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a relatively higher level of self-care is an important correlate of social support and may explain how social support influences HF outcomes. This study also suggests that family members should play a greater part in clinical care focused on improving self-care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 · Cited by 13,339
Social Relationships and Health.
Cohen, S. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.8.676 · Cited by 4,852
Rosamond, W., Flegal, K., Friday, G., Furie, K., Go, A., Greenlund, K., Haase, N., Ho, M., Howard, V., Kissela, B., et al. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.179918 · Cited by 3,277
Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis.
DiMatteo, M. R. (2004) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207 · Cited by 2,107 · cited 5×
“Consistent with the existing literature [13], we hypothesized that functional and structural support were associated with self-care in simultaneous models predicting self-care.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice
Rozanski, A., Blumenthal, J. A., Davidson, K. W., Saab, P. G., & Kubzansky, L. (2005) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.005 · Cited by 1,238 · cited 1×
“Structural support or the availability of support through one’s social circumstances or social network has been associated with more positive health behavior and health outcomes in general medical populations [24] and in cardiovascular populations [8, 9].”
BackgroundLong-term effect of social relationships on mortality in patients with congestive heart failure
Murberg, T. A. (2004) · The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine · doi:10.2190/gkj2-p8bd-v59x-mjnq · Cited by 68 · cited 1×
“There is mounting evidence that positive social support is associated with fewer hospitalizations and decreased risk of mortality due to HF (8-12), and evidence among the broader range of chronically ill patients that social support is associated with better treatment adherence(13).”
Background
Cited by
Riegel, B., Moser, D. K., Anker, S. D., Appel, L. J., Dunbar, S. B., Grady, K. L., Gurvitz, M. Z., Havranek, E. P., Lee, C. S., Lindenfeld, J., et al. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.192628 · Cited by 961
Self-citationGreene, J. A., Choudhry, N. K., Kilabuk, E., & Shrank, W. H. (2011) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1526-3 · Cited by 777
An Update on the Self-care of Heart Failure Index
Riegel, B., Lee, C. S., Dickson, V. V., & Carlson, B. (2009) · Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/jcn.0b013e3181b4baa0 · Cited by 621
Self-citationAssociation of Facebook Use With Compromised Well-Being: A Longitudinal Study
Shakya, H. B., & Christakis, N. A. (2017) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kww189 · Cited by 378
Caregivers’ contributions to heart failure self-care: A systematic review
Buck, H. G., Harkness, K., Wion, R., Carroll, S. L., Cosman, T., Kaasalainen, S., Kryworuchko, J., McGillion, M., O’Keefe-McCarthy, S., Sherifali, D., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1177/1474515113518434 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Sayers, S. L., Riegel, B., Pawlowski, S., Coyne, J. C., & Samaha, F. F.
- Venue
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-79
- ISSN
- 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
- 0883-6612
- 1532-4796
- OpenAlex
- W1968482539
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Support and Self-Care of Patients with Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12160-007-9003-x
- The paper
- Sayers, S. L., Riegel, B., Pawlowski, S., Coyne, J. C., & Samaha, F. F. (2008). Social Support and Self-Care of Patients with Heart Failure. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-007-9003-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.