Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 961

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

State of the Science: Promoting Self-Care in Persons With Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Riegel, Barbara, Moser, Debra K., Anker, Stefan D., Appel, Lawrence J., Dunbar, Sandra B., Grady, Kathleen L., Gurvitz, Michelle Z., Havranek, Edward P., Lee, Christopher S., Lindenfeld, JoAnn, Peterson, Pamela N., Pressler, Susan J., Schocken, Douglas D., Whellan, David J.·2009·Circulation
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.109.192628
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

S elf-care is advocated as a method of improving outcomes from heart failure (HF), the final common pathway for several prevalent illnesses, including hypertension and coronary artery disease.HF is widespread in aging populations across the world. 1 The burden of HF is manifested in poor quality of life (QOL) 2,3 and early mortality. 4In addition, there are Ͼ3 million ambulatory care and emergency department visits 5 and well over 1 million hospitalizations for HF in the United States annually, 6 which contributes to the exorbitant costs associated with HF.Much of this healthcare utilization is thought to be preventable if patients engage in consistent self-care. 7,8his scientific statement seeks to highlight concepts and evidence important to the understanding and promotion of self-care in persons with HF.Specifically, the document describes what is known about (1) the self-care behaviors required of HF patients, (2) factors that make self-care challenging for patients, (3) interventions that promote selfcare, and (4) the effect of self-care on HF outcomes.The review ends with evidence-based recommendations for clinicians and direction for future research.The American Heart Association makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel.Specifically, all members of the writing group are required to complete and submit a Disclosure Questionnaire showing all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.109.192628

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 961

Metadata

Authors
Riegel, B., Moser, D. K., Anker, S. D., Appel, L. J., Dunbar, S. B., Grady, K. L., Gurvitz, M. Z., Havranek, E. P., Lee, C. S., Lindenfeld, J., Peterson, P. N., Pressler, S. J., Schocken, D. D., & Whellan, D. J.
Venue
Circulation
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2009-09-22
Volume
120
Issue
12
Pages
1141-1163
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
DOI
10.1161/circulationaha.109.192628
OpenAlex
W2042507422
Cited by
961
References
24
FWCI
42.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: State of the Science: Promoting Self-Care in Persons With Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.109.192628
The paper
Riegel, B., Moser, D. K., Anker, S. D., Appel, L. J., Dunbar, S. B., Grady, K. L., Gurvitz, M. Z., Havranek, E. P., Lee, C. S., Lindenfeld, J., Peterson, P. N., Pressler, S. J., Schocken, D. D., & Whellan, D. J. (2009). State of the Science: Promoting Self-Care in Persons With Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.192628

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.