Cited by 68Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsStress Responses and CortisolDiabetes Management and Education

Psychosocial Stress Predicts Abnormal Glucose Metabolism: The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) Study

Open access
Williams, Emily D., Magliano, Dianna J., Tapp, Robyn J., Oldenburg, Brian F., Shaw, Jonathan E.·2013·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The evidence supporting a relationship between stress and diabetes has been inconsistent. PURPOSE: This study examined the effects of stress on abnormal glucose metabolism, using a population-based sample of 3,759, with normoglycemia at baseline, from the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle study. METHODS: Perceived stress and stressful life events were measured at baseline, with health behavior and anthropometric information also collected. Oral glucose tolerance tests were undertaken at baseline and 5-year follow-up. The primary outcome was the development of abnormal glucose metabolism (impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, and type 2 diabetes), according to WHO 1999 criteria. RESULTS: Perceived stress predicted incident abnormal glucose metabolism in women but not men, after multivariate adjustment. Life events showed an inconsistent relationship with abnormal glucose metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived stress predicted abnormal glucose metabolism in women. Healthcare professionals should consider psychosocial adversity when assessing risk factor profiles for the development of diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12160-013-9473-y

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between perceived stress and T2DM varies by sex or socioeconomic status in some studies.

    “However, this association has been shown in some studies to vary by sex or socioeconomic status (as measured by occupational status), which indicates that these factors might moderate this relationship.”
  • A link exists between perceived stress and development of T2DM.

    “Considering the evidence as a whole, a link seems to exist between perceived stress and development of T2DM.”
  • In Australian adults (n=3,759; 5-year follow-up), perceived stress in a 30-item questionnaire was associated with abnormal glucose tolerance rather than overt diabetes mellitus, only in women (OR 1.72...).

    “Australian adults ( n = 3,759; 5 year follow- up) | Perceived stress in 30-item questionnaire | ‡ Outcome was abnormal glucose tolerance rather than overt diabetes mellitus. Association only in women OR 1.72”

    From Type 2 diabetes mellitus and psychological stress — a modifiable risk factor (2017) · cites this paper as Williams (2013) 76

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, E. D., Magliano, D. J., Tapp, R. J., Oldenburg, B. F., & Shaw, J. E.
Affiliations
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
  • Australian College of Optometry (AU)
Corresponding author
Williams, Emily D.
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2013-02-07
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
62-72
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W1979981107
Cited by
68
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Victorian Cancer Agency
  • Queensland Health
  • Pratt Foundation
  • Australian Government
  • Diabetes UK (09/0003833)
  • Diabetes Australia
  • Kidney Health Australia
  • Novo Nordisk
  • State Government of Victoria
  • Menzies Institute for Medical Research
  • Eli Lilly Australia
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (586623, 233200, NHMRC grant 233200)
  • Cilag
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
psychosocial stress, perceived stress, life events, abnormal glucose metabolism, type 2 diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, sex differences, diabetes risk factors, oral glucose tolerance test, AusDiab
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Life Change Events, Life Style, Male, Obesity, Perception, Prediabetic State, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Health Behavior, Glucose Intolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review