CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implementation Intentions for Physical Activity Behavior in Older Adult Women: An Examination of Executive Function as a Moderator of Treatment Effects

Hall, Peter A., Zehr, Christopher, Paulitzki, Jeffrey, Rhodes, Ryan·2014·Annals of Behavioral Medicine
DOI 10.1007/s12160-013-9582-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Implementation intentions are effective for enhancing physical activity, but it is unknown how well these effects extend to older adults and/or are modified by cognitive variables. Purpose Our objective is to examine (1) the efficacy of an implementation intentions intervention for physical activity in older adult women and (2) to examine the moderating effects of executive function. Methods Participants (N = 75, M age = 73.72) completed measures of executive function and were randomly assigned to weekly implementation intentions for physical activity (experimental condition), implementation intentions for an unrelated behavior (control condition), or no treatment. Baseline activity was measured by accelerometer and self-report; follow-up activity was measured by weekly self-report. Results Findings indicated a significant treatment effect for the experimental condition and a treatment by executive function interaction. Specifically, participants with relatively stronger executive function benefited most from the experimental intervention. Conclusions Implementation intentions are effective for enhancing physical activity among older adult women, and the effects may be especially pronounced for those with relatively stronger executive function.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12160-013-9582-7

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol. 1999; 54(7): 493-503. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Armitage CJ. Efficacy of a brief worksite intervention to reduce smoking: The roles of behavioral and implementation intentions. J Occup Health Psychol. 2008; 12(4): 376-390. · DOI
  3. Sheeran P, Orbell S. Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychol. 2000; 19(3): 283-289. · DOI
  4. Steadman L, Quine L. Encouraging young males to perform testicular self-examination: A simple, but effective, implementation intentions intervention. Br J Health Psychol. 2004; 9(4): 479-487. · DOI
  5. van Osch L, Reubsaet A, Lechner L, de Vries H. The formation of specific action plans can enhance sun protection behavior in motivated parents. Prev Med. 2008; 47: 127-132. · DOI
  6. Armitage CJ. Effectiveness of experimenter-provided and self-generated implementation intentions to reduce alcohol consumption in a sample of the general population: A randomized exploratory trial. Health Psychol. 2009; 28(5): 545-553. · DOI
  7. Armitage CJ. Evidence that implementation intentions reduce dietary fat intake: A randomized trial. Health Psychol. 2004; 23(3): 319-323. · DOI
  8. Stadler G, Oettingen G, Gollwitzer PM. Intervention effects of information and self-regulation on eating fruits and vegetables over two years. Health Psychol. 2010; 29(3): 274-283. · DOI
  9. Bélanger-Gravel A, Godin G, Amireault S. A meta-analytic review of the effect of implementation intentions on physical activity. Health Psychol Rev. 2013; 7: 23-54. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2011.560095 . · DOI · Paper page
  10. Paul I, Gawrilow C, Zech F, et al. If-then planning modulates the P300 in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuroreport. 2007; 18: 653-657. · DOI
  11. Allan JL, Sniehotta FF, Johnston M. The best laid plans: Planning skill determines the effectiveness of action plans and implementation intentions. Ann Behav Med. 2013. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9483-9 . published online ahead of print February 28 2013. · DOI
  12. Hall PA, Zehr CE, Ng M, Zanna MP. Implementation intentions for physical activity in supportive and unsupportive environmental conditions: An experimental examination of intention–behavior consistency. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012; 48: 432-436. · DOI
  13. McFarland CP, Glisky EL. Implementation intentions and prospective memory among older adults: An investigation of the role of frontal lobe function. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn. 2011; 18: 633-652. · DOI
  14. Johnson-Kozlow M, Sallis JF, Gilpin EA, Rock CL, Pierce, JP. Comparative validation of the IPAQ and the 7-Day PAR among women diagnosed with breast cancer. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3(7). doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-7 . · DOI
  15. Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37(suppl 11): S531-S543. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Matthews CE, Ainsworth BE, Thompson RW, Bassett DR Jr. Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34(8): 1376-1381. · DOI
  17. Eslinger DW, Tremblay MS. Technical reliability assessment of three accelerometer models in a mechanical setup. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(12): 2173-2181. · DOI
  18. Jodo E, Kayama Y. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a go/no-go task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 82(6): 477-482. · DOI
  19. Kiefer M, Marzinzik F, Weisbrod M, Scherg M, Spitzer M. The time course of brain activations during response inhibition: Evidence from event-related potentials in a go/no-go task. Neuroreport. 1998; 9(4): 765-770. · DOI
  20. Allison PD. Missing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005.
  21. Schafer JL. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data: Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 72. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1997. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hall PA, Fong GT. Temporal self-regulation theory: Integrating biological, psychological and ecological determinants of health behavior performance. In: Hall P, ed. Social neuroscience and public health: Foundations for the science of chronic disease prevention. New York, NY: Springer; 2013. · DOI
  23. Kramer AF, Hahn S, Cohen NJ, et al. Ageing, fitness and neurocognitive function. Nature. 1999; 400(6743): 418-419. doi: 10.1038/22682 . · DOI · Paper page
  24. McAuley E, Mullen SP, Szabo AN, et al. Self-regulatory processes and exercise adherence in older adults: Executive function and self-efficacy effects. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 41(3): 284-290. · DOI
  25. Sniehotta FF, Schwarzer R, Scholz U, Schüz B. Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: Theory and assessment. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2005; 35: 565-576. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 33

Metadata

Authors
Hall, P. A., Zehr, C., Paulitzki, J., & Rhodes, R.
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2014-02-06
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
130-136
ISSN
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
DOI
10.1007/s12160-013-9582-7
Cited by
33
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review