Remote Forensic Psychological Assessment in Civil Cases: Considerations for Experts Assessing Harms from Early Life Abuse
Open accessAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to the fore the question of whether psycho-legal assessments can be executed remotely in a manner that adheres to the rigorous standards applied during in-person assessments. General guidelines have evolved, but to date, there are no explicit directives about whether and how to proceed. This paper reviews professional, ethical, and legal challenges that experts should consider before conducting such an evaluation remotely. Although the discussion is more widely applicable, remote forensic psychological assessment of adults alleging childhood abuse is used as an example throughout, due to the complexity of these cases, the ethical dilemmas they can present, and the need to carefully assess non-verbal trauma-related symptoms. The use of videoconferencing technology is considered in terms of potential benefits of this medium, as well as challenges this method could pose to aspects of interviewing and psychometric testing. The global pandemic is also considered with respect to its effects on functioning and mental health and the confounding impact such a crisis has on assessing the relationship between childhood abuse and current psychological functioning. Finally, for those evaluators who want to engage in remote assessment, practice considerations are discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Czeisler, M. É., Lane, R. I., Petrosky, E., Wiley, J. F., Christensen, A., Njai, R., Weaver, M. D., Robbins, R., Facer-Childs, E. R., Barger, L. K., et al. (2020) · MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1 · Cited by 2,686 · see citing works
Weathers, F. W., Bovin, M. J., Lee, D. J., Sloan, D. M., Schnurr, P. P., Kaloupek, D. G., Keane, T. M., & Marx, B. P. (2018) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000486 · Cited by 1,799 · see citing works
Personality Assessment Inventory
Morey, L. C. (2011) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t03903-000 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Why the COVID-19 pandemic is a traumatic stressor
Bridgland, V. M. E., Moeck, E. K., Green, D. M., Swain, T. L., Nayda, D. M., Matson, L. A., Hutchison, N. P., & Takarangi, M. K. T. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240146 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Berger, T. (2017) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2015.1119908 · Cited by 364 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…research generally suggests that remote treatment formats do not differ significantly with respect to the clinician and plaintiff’s capacity to build rapport and develop a working alliance (Berger, 2017; Germain et al., 2010; Kocsis & Yellowlees, 2018; Morgan et al., 2008; Varker et al., 2019).”
BackgroundNeuropsychological test administration by videoconference: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Brearly, T. W., Shura, R. D., Martindale, S. L., Lazowski, R. A., Luxton, D. D., Shenal, B. V., & Rowland, J. A. (2017) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-017-9349-1 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Best practices for remote psychological assessment via telehealth technologies.
Luxton, D. D., Pruitt, L. D., & Osenbach, J. E. (2014) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0034547 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Horowitz, L. M., Snyder, D. J., Boudreaux, E. D., He, J.-P., Harrington, C. J., Cai, J., Claassen, C. A., Salhany, J. E., Dao, T., Chaves, J. F., et al. (2020) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/j.psym.2020.04.008 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Germain, V., Marchand, A., Bouchard, S., Guay, S., & Drouin, M.-S. (2009) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0139 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Using e-Health to Enable Culturally Appropriate Mental Healthcare in Rural Areas
Yellowlees, P., Marks, S., Hilty, D., & Shore, J. H. (2008) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2007.0070 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Goldenson, J., & Josefowitz, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Goldenson, Julie
- ORCID
- Goldenson, Julie
- Venue
- Psychological Injury and Law
- Published
- 2021-03-13
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-103
- ISSN
- 1938-971X (ISSN-L)
- 1938-9728
- PMC
- PMC7970781
- OpenAlex
- W3138268435
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Psychological Injury and Law (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- videoconferencing, childhood abuse, harm assessment, civil litigation, expert witnesses, professional ethics, legal challenges, psychometric assessment, COVID-19 pandemic, psychological functioning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
