Cited by 15Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesIndigenous Knowledge Systems and AgricultureEnvironmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond

Amerindian and afro-american perceptions of their traditional knowledge in the chocó biodiversity hotspot

Cámara-Leret, Rodrigo, Copete, Juan C., Balslev, Henrik, Gomez, Marybel Soto, Macía, Manuel J.·2016·Economic Botany

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12231-016-9341-3

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Barfod, A. and H. Balslev. 1988. The use of palms by the Cayapas and Coaiqueres on the coastal plain of Ecuador. Principes 32:29–42.
  2. ———, ———, and M. J. Macía. 2012. A standard protocol for gathering palm ethnobotanical data and socioeconomic variables across the tropics. In: Medicinal plants and the legacy of Richard E. Schultes, Proceedings of the Botany 2011 Symposium Honoring Dr. Richard E. Schultes, eds. B. E. Ponman and and R. W. Bussmann, 41–71. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden.
  3. Cerón, C. E. 1993. Estudio preliminar de plantas útiles del Parque Nacional Machalilla. Hombre y Ambiente 25:73–130.
  4. ——— 2001. Caracterización botánica de la Comunidad Playa de Oro, cuenca el Río Santiago, provincia de Esmeraldas. Cinchona 2:30–65.
  5. ——— 2002. Aportes a la flora útil de Cerro Blanco, Guayas-Ecuador. Cinchona 3:17–25.
  6. ——— and C. Montalvo. 2002. Etnobotánica Awá de Guadalito, San Lorenzo, Esmeraldas. Cinchona 3:46–54.
  7. ———, ———, A. Calazacón, and G. Toasa. 2004. Etnobotánica Tsáchila, Pichincha-Ecuador. Cinchona 5:109–194.
  8. DANE. 2007. Colombia una nación multicultural. Su diversidad etnica. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadísticas (DANE), Bogotá.
  9. Paniagua-Zambrana, N. Y., M. J. Macía, and R. Cámara-Leret. 2010. Toma de datos etnobotánicos de palmeras y variables socioeconómicas en comunidades rurales. Ecología en Bolivia 45:44–68.
  10. Potvin, C. and H. Barrios. 2004. Conservation of medicinal plants in an Emberá community of Panamá: Property rights and knowledge transmission. Medicinal Plant Conservation 9:14–18.
  11. Zent, S. 2009. Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and biocultural diversity: A close-up look at linkages, delearning trends, and changing patterns of transmission. Pages 39–57 in P. Bates, M. Chiba, S. Kube, and D. Nakashima, eds., Learning and knowing in indigenous societies today. UNESCO, Paris.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cámara-Leret, R., Copete, J. C., Balslev, H., Gomez, M. S., & Macía, M. J.
Venue
Economic Botany
Published
2016-04-29
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
160-175
ISSN
  • 0013-0001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1874-9364
OpenAlex
W2343095849
Cited by
15
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Economic Botany (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Union, 7th Framework Programme (212631)
  • Aarhus Universitet (GSST grant)
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Travel grants programme)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
Keywords
traditional knowledge, Afro-Colombians, Embera, palm uses, ethnobotany, intergenerational knowledge transmission, use value, IPBES, biodiversity assessment, indigenous knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review