Cited by 11Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesIndigenous Knowledge Systems and AgricultureIndigenous Studies in Latin America

Palm use by two chachi communities in Ecuador: a 30-year reappraisal

Open access
Schneider, Eliane, Cámara-Leret, Rodrigo, Barfod, Anders, Weckerle, Caroline S.·2017·Economic Botany

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12231-017-9397-8

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Barfod, A.S. and H. Balslev. 1988. The use of palms by the Cayapas and Coaiqueres on the coastal plain of Ecuador. Principes 32 (1): 29–42.
  2. Barriga-López, F. 1987. Etnología ecuatoriana: Cayapas o Chachis. Quito: Instituto Ecuatoriano de Crédito Educativo y Becas.
  3. Carrasco, E. 1983. El pueblo chachi: el jeengume avanza. Colección Ethnos. Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala.
  4. Hazlewood, J.A. 2004. Socio-environmental consequences of market integration among the Chachis of Esmeraldas, Ecuador. PhD thesis, University of Florida.
  5. Medina, H. 1992. Los Chachi: Supervivencia y ley tradicional. Quito: Abya-Yala.
  6. Murra, J. 1946. The historic tribes of Ecuador. In: Steward, J. H. (ed.), Handboook of South American Indians 4:785–821. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Prining Office.
  7. Yépez Montúfar, J. 2013. Chispero: Censo Sociopolítico y de Saberes Ancestrales 2012. Quito: Editorial Instituto De Alto Estudios Nacionales 1: 1–78.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneider, E., Cámara-Leret, R., Barfod, A., & Weckerle, C. S.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
Economic Botany
Published
2017-12
Volume
71
Issue
4
Pages
342-360
ISSN
  • 0013-0001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1874-9364
OpenAlex
W2781919459
Cited by
11
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economic Botany (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
Keywords
Chachi people, traditional knowledge, Arecaceae, Iriartea deltoidea, blowguns, loss of traditional knowledge, ecosystem services, natural resource management, land use change, coastal lowlands, climate change threats, Sustainable Development Goals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review