Cited by 3Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist-Experienced Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Switching to Once-Weekly Semaglutide in a Real-World Setting: SURE Program Post Hoc Analysis

Open access

Abstract

To investigate outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes who switched to once-weekly (OW) semaglutide from another glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) in clinical practice. This post hoc analysis used data from the SemaglUtide Real-world Evidence (SURE) program, which included nine observational studies investigating the initiation of OW semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice. Using a random coefficient-adjusted mixed model for repeated measurements, changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight, and body mass index were analyzed for GLP-1RA-experienced patients who had at least one documented HbA1c value within the 12 weeks before switching to OW semaglutide. In addition, descriptive statistics were used for HbA1c, body weight target achievement, and safety data. Of the 3,505 patients included in the nine SURE studies, 651 switched to OW semaglutide from another GLP-1RA. GLP-1RA-experienced patients who switched to OW semaglutide demonstrated a 0.67%-point [95% confidence interval (CI) − 0.74; − 0.60, p < 0.0001] reduction in HbA1c, and a 3.69-kg [95% CI − 3.98; − 3.41, p < 0.0001] reduction in body weight over 30 weeks. A body weight reduction of ≥ 5% was achieved by 27.6% of patients, and 33.3% of patients with baseline HbA1c ≥ 7% achieved HbA1c < 7% at end of study. No new safety concerns were identified. Data from this post hoc analysis suggest that, for those not adequately responding to treatment with other GLP-1RAs, switching to OW semaglutide could provide additional glycemic and weight benefits with the convenience of an OW dosing regimen. A graphical abstract is available with this article.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12325-024-03000-x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies reporting results in an 'as-started' approach found considerably lower weight-loss effectiveness.

    “Importantly, the weight‐loss effectiveness of GLP‐1RA was similar to what has been observed in trials when focusing on the subgroup of adherent patients who consistently took their prescribed GLP‐1RA, for example, at 12 months follow‐up, 50 , 53 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 61 whereas studies reporting results in an ‘as‐started’ approach found considerably lower effectiveness. 52 , 59 , 63 , 66”

    From Real‐world evidence on the utilization, clinical and comparative effectiveness, and adverse effects of newer GLP ‐ 1RA ‐based weight‐loss therapies (2025) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Methods (Statistical Analyses; page unavailable) include patients who paused or discontinued semaglutide, consistent with an ‘as-started’ approach. The Results (Clinical Outcomes; page unavailable) report 3.69 kg of weight loss over 30 weeks, but do not compare that result with adherent patients or trials. The source therefore does not establish that as-started effectiveness was considerably lower. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Meier J. Efficacy of semaglutide in a subcutaneous and an oral formulation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:645617. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Meier JJ, Gallwitz B, Giorgino F. Reviews and novel clinical perspectives on semaglutide: a GLP-1 receptor agonist with both injectable and oral formulations. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12: 760153. · DOI
  3. Ahmann AJ, Capehorn M, Charpentier G, Dotta F, Henkel E, Lingvay I, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus exenatide ER in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): a 56-week, open-label, randomized clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(2):258–66. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Pratley RE, Aroda VR, Lingvay I, Lüdemann J, Andreassen C, Navarria A, et al. Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(4):275–86. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Sorli C, Harashima S-I, Tsoukas GM, Unger J, Karsbøl JD, Hansen T, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, multicentre phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(4):251–60. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Aroda VR, Bain SC, Cariou B, Piletič M, Rose L, Axelsen M, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily insulin glargine as add-on to metformin (with or without sulfonylureas) in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(5):355–66. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Lingvay I, Catarig A-M, Frias JP, Kumar H, Lausvig NL, le Roux CW, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus daily canagliflozin as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 8): a double-blind, phase 3b, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(11):834–44. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Capehorn M, Catarig A-M, Furberg JK, Janez A, Price HC, Tadayon S, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 1.0mg vs. once-daily liraglutide 1.2mg as add-on to 1–3 oral antidiabetic drugs in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 10). Diabetes Metab. 2020;46(2):100–9. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lingvay I, Kirk AR, Lophaven S, Wolden ML, Shubrook JH. Outcomes in GLP-1 RA-experienced patients switching to once-weekly semaglutide in a real-world setting: the retrospective, observational EXPERT sudy. Diabetes Ther. 2021;12(3):879–96. · DOI
  10. Jain AB, Kanters S, Khurana R, Kissock J, Severin N, Stafford SG. Real-world effectiveness analysis of switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide to semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the retrospective REALISE-DM study. Diabetes Ther. 2021;12(2):527–36. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hepprich M, Zillig D, Florian-Reynoso MA, Donath MY, Rudofsky G. Switch-to-Semaglutide Study (STS-Study): a retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Ther. 2021;12(3):943–54. · DOI
  12. Di Loreto C, Minarelli V, Nasini G, Norgiolini R, Del Sindaco P. Effectiveness in real world of once weekly semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes: glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist naïve or switchers from other glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists: Results from a retrospective observational study in Umbria. Diabetes Ther. 2022;13(3):551–67. · DOI
  13. Takahashi Y, Nomoto H, Yokoyama H, Takano Y, Nagai S, Tsuzuki A, et al. Improvement of glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction by switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide to subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: A multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison study (SWITCH-SEMA 1 study). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023;25(6):1503–11. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Yale JF, Catarig AM, Grau K, Harris S, Klimek-Abercrombie A, Rabasa-Lhoret R, et al. Use of once-weekly semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice: results from the SURE Canada multicentre, prospective, observational study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(10):2269–78. · DOI
  15. Wolffenbuttel BH, Brugts MP, Catarig A-M, Clark A, Kok M, Lieverse AG, et al. Once-weekly semaglutide use in type 2 diabetes: real-world data from the SURE Netherlands observational study. Adv Ther. 2023;40(3):920–33. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Bellido V, Abreu Padín C, Catarig A-M, Clark A, Barreto Pittol S, Delgado E. Once-weekly semaglutide use in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the SURE Spain multicentre, prospective, observational study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(17):4938. · DOI
  17. Mohammedi K, Belhatem N, Berentzen TL, Catarig A-M, Potier L. Once-weekly semaglutide use in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the SURE France multicentre, prospective, observational study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023;25(7):1855–64. · DOI
  18. Napoli R, Berra C, Catarig AM, Di Loreto C, Donatiello E, Berentzen TL, et al. Once-weekly semaglutide use in patients with type 2 diabetes: real-world data from the SURE Italy observational study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023;25:165/ – 1667. · DOI
  19. Yale J-F, Bodholdt U, Catarig A-M, Catrina S, Clark A, Ekberg N, et al. Real-world use of once-weekly semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: pooled analysis of data from four SURE studies by baseline characteristic subgroups. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022;10:e002619. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Uzoigwe C, Liang Y, Whitmire S, Paprocki Y. Semaglutide once-weekly persistence and adherence versus other GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes in a US real-world setting. Diabetes Ther. 2021;12(5):1475–89. · DOI
  21. Almandoz JP, Lingvay I, Morales J, Campos C. Switching between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: rationale and practical guidance. Clin Diabetes. 2020;38(4):390–402. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rudofsky, G., Menzen, M., Potier, L., Catarig, A.-M., Clark, A., Priyadarshini, P., & Abreu, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • Novo Nordisk (India) (IN)
  • Hospital General De Segovia (ES)
Corresponding author
Rudofsky, Gottfried
Venue
Advances in Therapy
Published
2024-12-05
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
788-800
ISSN
  • 0741-238X (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-8652
OpenAlex
W4405079383
Cited by
3
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
semaglutide, type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists, treatment switching, weekly dosing, glycemic control, HbA1c, weight loss, body mass index, real-world evidence, treatment non-responders
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Semaglutide, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Administration Schedule, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Drug Substitution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review