Cited by 11Coronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Correction to: ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

Open access
Patel, Manesh R., Calhoon, John H., Dehmer, Gregory J., Grantham, James Aaron, Maddox, Thomas M., Maron, David J., Smith, Peter K.·2018·Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Abstract

To more clearly reflect the relationship between iFR (instantaneous wave-free ratio) and FFR (fractional flow reserve), this Correction document highlights the following changes to the original document published in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology; the version available at JACC [1] has been updated to reflect the changes, with JACC's Correction document available at [2].

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12350-018-1292-x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In symptomatic patients, the presence of coronary calcium is associated with future cardiovascular events in the stable chest pain setting.

    “In symptomatic patients, the presence of coronary calcium is associated with future cardiovascular events in the stable chest pain setting9”

    From Deep convolutional neural networks to predict cardiovascular risk from computed tomography (2021) · cites this paper as [9]

    The correction (pp. 2191–2192) addresses iFR, FFR, and coronary pressure measurements, not coronary calcium. Searches for calcium and future cardiovascular events in symptomatic patients with stable chest pain found no passage addressing the claimed association. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patel, M. R., Calhoon, J. H., Dehmer, G. J., Grantham, J. A., Maddox, T. M., Maron, D. J., & Smith, P. K.
Affiliations
  • Duke University Health System (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Saint Luke's Hospital (US)
  • VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Patel, Manesh R.
  • Maddox, Thomas M.
  • Maron, David J.
Venue
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
2191-2192
ISSN
1071-3581 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2685995019
Cited by
11
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nuclear Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
coronary revascularization, stable coronary artery disease, appropriate use criteria, instantaneous wave-free ratio, fractional flow reserve, coronary artery disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review