Cited by 157Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderMind wandering and attentionPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Living “in the zone”: hyperfocus in adult ADHD

Hupfeld, Kathleen E., Abagis, Tessa R., Shah, Priti·2019·ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders

Abstract

Adults with ADHD often report episodes of long-lasting, highly focused attention, a surprising report given their tendency to be distracted by irrelevant information. This has been colloquially termed "hyperfocus" (HF). Here, we introduce a novel assessment tool, the "Adult Hyperfocus Questionnaire" and test the preregistered a priori hypothesis that HF is more prevalent in individuals with high levels of ADHD symptomology. We assess (1) a pilot sample (n = 251) and (2) a replication sample (n = 372) of adults with or without ADHD. Participants completed highly validated scales, including the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale, to index ADHD symptomology. Those with higher ADHD symptomology reported higher total and dispositional HF and more frequent HF across each of the three settings (school, hobbies, and screen time) as well as on a fourth subscale describing real-world HF scenarios. These findings are both clinically and scientifically significant, as this is the first study to comprehensively assess HF in adults with high ADHD symptomology and to present a means for assessing HF. Moreover, the sizable prevalence of HF in adults with high levels of ADHD symptomology leads to a need to study it as a potentially separable feature of the ADHD syndrome.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12402-018-0272-y

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Conners C, Erhardt D, Sparrow E (1999) Adult ADHD rating scales: technical manual. Multi-Health Systems Inc, Toronto
  2. Leimkuhler ME (1994) Attention-deficit disorder in adults and adolescents: cognitive, behavioral, and personality styles. In: Ellison J, Weinstein C, Hodel-Malinofsky T (eds) The psychotherapists’ guide to neuropsychiatric patients: diagnostic and treatment issues. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC, pp 175–216

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 157

Metadata

Authors
Hupfeld, K. E., Abagis, T. R., & Shah, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Hupfeld, Kathleen E.
Venue
ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders
Published
2018-09-28
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
191-208
ISSN
  • 1866-6116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-6647
OpenAlex
W2894319308
Cited by
157
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Institute of Education Sciences (R324A150023)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
hyperfocus, adult ADHD, attentional focus, distractibility, screen time, hobbies, school environment
MeSH terms
Attentional Bias, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Case-Control Studies, Behavior, Addictive, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review