The increase of electric vehicle usage in Norway—Incentives and adverse effects
Open accessAbstract
Norway has been named the “capital” of Electric Vehicles (EVs) because the purchase and use of EVs in Norway has increased tremendously over the last few years. Currently, the fleet of EVs in Norway is the largest per capita in the world. From a transportation research perspective, the questions immediately asked are (i) what economic incentives make the purchase and use of EVs in Norway so attractive to road users; (ii) do these incentives have any adverse effects and, if so, how large are they; and (iii) how does the marginal external cost of EVs compare to that of conventional vehicles. We explore the above questions using available data, the literature and personal observations while relating to the city of Oslo as a case study. We find that the tremendous increase in the use of EVs is the result of multiple economic incentives, such as exemption from toll charges, exemption from purchase duties and permission to use transit lanes that induce road users to purchase and use EVs. The increase in EVs has led to a reduction in CO2 emissions. However, some of the EV incentives have adverse effects, the most serious of which is the exemption from toll charges, which has led to a sizable loss of toll revenue. We find that the marginal external cost of EVs’ road use is approximately the same as that for a conventional vehicle. The incentives for EVs should consider the adverse effects and how electricity is produced; the Norwegian approach should not be followed by other countries without due consideration of these factors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some government incentives can have adverse effects, e.g., exemption of toll charges has significantly reduced toll revenue.
“some of these incentives can have adverse effects (e.g., the exemption of toll charges has significantly reduced toll revenue [141]).”
From A Review on Electric Vehicles: Technologies and Challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Electric Vehicles in China: Emissions and Health Impacts
Ji, S., Cherry, C., Bechle, M. J., Wu, Y., & Marshall, J. D. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es202347q · Cited by 244 · see citing works
The Norwegian support and subsidy policy of electric cars. Should it be adopted by other countries?
Holtsmark, B. J., & Skonhoft, A. (2014) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.06.006 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Electromobility in Norway - Experiences and Opportunities With Electric Vehicles
Figenbaum, E., & Kolbenstvedt, M. (2013) · TØI Report · Cited by 64 · see citing works
The future is electric! The EV revolution in Norway — Explanations and lessons learned
Hannisdahl, O. H., Malvik, H. V., & Wensaas, G. B. (2013) · doi:10.1109/evs.2013.6914921 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Hultkrantz, L., & Liu, X. (2012) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.03.001 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Elbilpolitikken - virker den etter hensikten?
Holtsmark, B. J. (2012) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review on Electric Vehicles: Technologies and Challenges
Sanguesa, J. A., Torres-Sanz, V., Garrido, P., Martinez, F. J., & Marquez-Barja, J. M. (2021) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities4010022 · Cited by 1,367 · see citing works
Nyborg, K., Anderies, J. M., Dannenberg, A., Lindahl, T., Schill, C., Schlüter, M., Adger, W. N., Arrow, K. J., Barrett, S., Carpenter, S., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf8317 · Cited by 775 · see citing works
Public procurement of electric vehicles as a way to support a market: examples from Sweden
Palm, J., & Backman, F. (2017) · International Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles · doi:10.1504/ijehv.2017.087587 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aasness, M. A., & Odeck, J.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- ORCID
- Odeck, James
- Venue
- European Transport Research Review
- Published
- 2015-10-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1866-8887 (ISSN-L)
- 1867-0717
- OpenAlex
- W1905969721
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Transport Research Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata
- Statens vegvesen
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Social Sciences › Transportation › transportation and logistics systems
- Keywords
- electric vehicles, Norway, Oslo, economic incentives, toll exemption, CO2 emission reduction, marginal external costs, electricity generation, transport policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review