Cited by 30Thermal Regulation in MedicineHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyAnesthesia and Sedative Agents

The accuracy of a disposable noninvasive core thermometer

Open access
Kimberger, Oliver, Saager, Leif, Egan, Cameron, Sanchez, Ivan Parra, Dizili, Sebahat, Koch, Jochim, Kurz, Andrea·2013·Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie

Abstract

Purpose Perioperative hypothermia is still a common occurrence, and it can be difficult to measure a patient's core temperature accurately, especially during regional anesthesia, with placement of a laryngeal mask airway device, or postoperatively. We evaluated a new disposable double-sensor thermometer and compared the resulting temperatures with those of a distal esophageal thermometer and a bladder thermometer in patients undergoing general and regional anesthesia, respectively. Furthermore, we compared the accuracy of the thermometer between regional and general anesthesia, since forehead microcirculation might differ between the two types of anesthesia.Methods We assessed core temperature in 36 general anesthesia patients and 20 patients having regional anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. The temperatures obtained using the double-sensor thermometer were compared with those obtained with the distal esophageal thermometer in the general anesthesia population and those obtained with the bladder thermometer in regional anesthesia patients.Results In our general anesthesia patients, 90% (95% confidence interval [CI] 85 to 95) of all double-sensor values were within 0.5°C of esophageal temperatures. The average difference (bias) between the esophageal and double-sensor temperatures was -0.01°C. In patients undergoing regional anesthesia 89% (95% CI 80 to 97) of all double-sensor values were within 0.5°C of bladder temperatures. The average difference (bias) between the bladder and double-sensor temperatures was -0.13°C, limits of agreement were -0.65 to 0.40°C.Conclusions In a perioperative patient population undergoing general or regional anesthesia, the accuracy of the noninvasive disposable double-sensor thermometer is comparable with that of the distal esophageal and bladder thermometers in routine clinical practice. Furthermore, the sensor performed comparably in patients undergoing regional and general anesthesia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12630-013-0047-z

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Double Sensor provides a reliable and valid estimate of core body temperature.

    “This approach has been tested in various space analogs and clinical settings and has been found to provide a reliable and valid estimate of CBT20–23.”
  • The sensor probe applied to the forehead is a highly accurate surrogate compared to nasopharyngeal, esophageal and artery temperatures.

    “Importantly, the sensor probe can be applied to the forehead, and has been shown to be highly accurate surrogate compared to nasopharyngeal20, esophageal23–27 and artery temperatures24.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brauer A, Martin JD, Schuhmann MU, Braun U, Weyland W. Accuracy of intraoperative urinary bladder temperature monitoring during intra-abdominal operations (German). Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2000; 35: 435-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kimberger, O., Saager, L., Egan, C., Sanchez, I. P., Dizili, S., Koch, J., & Kurz, A.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Dräger (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Kurz, Andrea
Venue
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
Published
2013-11-09
Volume
60
Issue
12
Pages
1190-1196
ISSN
  • 0832-610X (ISSN-L)
  • 1496-8975
OpenAlex
W179967708
Cited by
30
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Thermal Regulation in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Keywords
core body temperature, perioperative hypothermia, regional anesthesia, general anesthesia, bladder temperature, thermometer accuracy
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, Conduction, Anesthesia, General, Body Temperature, Disposable Equipment, Humans, Thermometers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review