Cited by 129Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Sex dimorphism profile of Alzheimer’s disease-type pathologies in an APP/PS1 mouse model

Jiao, Shu-Sheng, Bu, Xian-Le, Liu, Yu-Hui, Zhu, Chi, Wang, Qing-Hua, Shen, Lin-Lin, Liu, Cheng-Hui, Wang, Ye-Ran +2 more·2016·Neurotoxicity Research

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia among the elderly, characterized by parenchymal and vascular beta-amyloid (Aβ) burden, tau pathology, neuroinflammation, and loss of neurons and synapses. There is a clear sex difference in the prevalence of AD. However, sex differences in AD-type pathologies have not been systematically documented. Applying 12-month-old female and male APP/PS1 mice as a model, we investigated the sex dimorphism in these major pathological indices. Compared with male APP/PS1 mice, the females exhibited higher parenchymal Aβ burdens, with the sex difference in hippocampus being the most significant. Female APP/PS1 mice had more severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy and subsequent microhemorrhage. In addition, female APP/PS1 mice also showed higher levels of phosphorylated tau and proinflammatory cytokines, more severe astrocytosis and microgliosis, and greater neuronal and synaptic degenerations. The present study systematically described a sex dimorphism in AD-type pathologic indices, suggesting that gender should be taken into account in designing studies involving these pathological indices and when interpreting the relevant findings in those studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12640-015-9589-x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiao, S.-S., Bu, X.-L., Liu, Y.-H., Zhu, C., Wang, Q.-H., Shen, L.-L., Liu, C.-H., Wang, Y.-R., Yao, X.-Q., & Wang, Y.-J.
Affiliations
Army Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Yan-Jiang
Venue
Neurotoxicity Research
Published
2015-12-26
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
256-266
ISSN
  • 1029-8428 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-3524
OpenAlex
W2289382754
Cited by
129
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurotoxicity Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81471296, 81200988)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, sexual dimorphism, APP/PS1 mice, amyloid-beta, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, microhemorrhages, tau phosphorylation, neuroinflammation, inflammatory cytokines, astrocyte activation, microglial activation, neurodegeneration, synaptic degeneration, hippocampus, vascular pathology
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Encephalitis, Female, Humans, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, Phosphorylation, Sex Characteristics, Synapses, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, tau Proteins, Inflammation Mediators, Mice, Presenilin-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review