The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Industry 4.0 framework for management and operations: a review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2008) · Biostatistics and Microbiology: A Survival Manual · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77282-0_6 · Cited by 17,371
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
(2022) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1231/1/011001 · Cited by 10,357
A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems
Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.-A. (2015) · Manufacturing Letters · doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 · Cited by 5,113
Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244014522633 · Cited by 4,395
Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios
Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2016) · 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2016.488 · Cited by 2,974
Service Innovation and Smart Analytics for Industry 4.0 and Big Data Environment
Lee, J., Kao, H.-A., & Yang, S. (2014) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.001 · Cited by 1,965
Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0
Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129 · Cited by 1,893
A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises
Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040 · Cited by 1,766 · cited 2×
“2016) (Schumacher et al. 2016) (Kans and Ingwald 2016) (Thiel and Thiel 2015) (Zhang et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialOesterreich, T. D., & Teuteberg, F. (2016) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006 · Cited by 1,526
Wang, S., Wan, J., Zhang, D., Li, D., & Zhang, C. (2016) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2015.12.017 · Cited by 1,404
Cited by
Horváth, D., & Szabó, R. Z. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021 · Cited by 1,281
Luthra, S., & Mangla, S. K. (2018) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.018 · Cited by 909
Sima, V., Gheorghe, I. G., Subić, J., & Nancu, D. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12104035 · Cited by 786
Digital servitization in manufacturing: A systematic literature review and research agenda
Paschou, T., Rapaccini, M., Adrodegari, F., & Saccani, N. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.012 · Cited by 537
Revolution 4.0: Industry vs. Agriculture in a Future Development for SMEs
Zambon, I., Cecchini, M., Egidi, G., Saporito, M. G., & Colantoni, A. (2019) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr7010036 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Saucedo-Martínez, J. A., Pérez-Lara, M., Marmolejo-Saucedo, J. A., Salais-Fierro, T. E., & Vasant, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing
- Published
- 2017-06-28
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 789-801
- ISSN
- 1868-5137 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-5145
- OpenAlex
- W2733424563
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 32.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Industry 4.0 framework for management and operations: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12652-017-0533-1
- The paper
- Saucedo-Martínez, J. A., Pérez-Lara, M., Marmolejo-Saucedo, J. A., Salais-Fierro, T. E., & Vasant, P. (2018). Industry 4.0 framework for management and operations: a review. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0533-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
