Cited by 114Multi-Criteria Decision MakingFuzzy and Soft Set TheoryFuzzy Systems and Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new approach to q-linear Diophantine fuzzy emergency decision support system for COVID19

Open access
Almagrabi, Alaa O., Abdullah, Saleem, Shams, Maria, Al-Otaibi, Yasser D., Ashraf, Shahzaib·2022·Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing

Abstract

The emergency situation of COVID-19 is a very important problem for emergency decision support systems. Control of the spread of COVID-19 in emergency situations across the world is a challenge and therefore the aim of this study is to propose a q-linear Diophantine fuzzy decision-making model for the control and diagnose COVID19. Basically, the paper includes three main parts for the achievement of appropriate and accurate measures to address the situation of emergency decision-making. First, we propose a novel generalization of Pythagorean fuzzy set, q-rung orthopair fuzzy set and linear Diophantine fuzzy set, called q-linear Diophantine fuzzy set (q-LDFS) and also discussed their important properties. In addition, aggregation operators play an effective role in aggregating uncertainty in decision-making problems. Therefore, algebraic norms based on certain operating laws for q-LDFSs are established. In the second part of the paper, we propose series of averaging and geometric aggregation operators based on defined operating laws under q-LDFS. The final part of the paper consists of two ranking algorithms based on proposed aggregation operators to address the emergency situation of COVID-19 under q-linear Diophantine fuzzy information. In addition, the numerical case study of the novel carnivorous (COVID-19) situation is provided as an application for emergency decision-making based on the proposed algorithms. Results explore the effectiveness of our proposed methodologies and provide accurate emergency measures to address the global uncertainty of COVID-19.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12652-021-03130-y

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LDFNs and q-LDFNs do not have the I-grade, which represents neutrality, and this leads to a lack of some information.

    “As mentioned above, LDFNs and q-LDFNs do not have the I-grade, which represents neutrality, which will lead to the lack of some information.”

    From T-spherical linear Diophantine fuzzy aggregation operators for multiple attribute decision-making (2023) · cites this paper as [12]

    Definition 5 (Basic concepts) describes LDFS using membership and non-membership grades and reference parameters; Definition 6 (Concept of q-rung linear Diophantine fuzzy set) describes the same structure for q-RLDFS and calculates hesitation or indeterminacy rather than specifying a separate neutrality grade. These passages support the absence of an independently specified I-grade, but the paper does not say that this causes information loss. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The best alternatives obtained by the methods of Riaz and Hashmi [11], Almagrabi et al. [12], and Riaz et al. [45] are the same as those obtained by the proposed operators.

    “It is clear from Table 7 that the best alternatives obtained by using the methods of Riaz and Hashmi [11], Almagrabi et al. [12] and Riaz et al. [45] remained our proposed operators.”
  • The q-LDFS is a special case of the T-SLDFS and can be written in the form of a T-SLDFS.

    “Thus, the q-LDFS is a special case of the T-SLDFS and can be easily written in the form of a T-SLDFS.”

    From T-spherical linear Diophantine fuzzy aggregation operators for multiple attribute decision-making (2023) · cites this paper as [12]

    Definition 6 and Corollaries 1–2 describe q-LDFS/q-RLDFS and its relationship to LDFS, but do not address T-SLDFS. Searches for “T-SLDFS special case q-LDFS” and “spherical linear Diophantine fuzzy set” found no passage establishing that q-LDFS is a special case of T-SLDFS or showing how to write it in that form. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Atanassov K (1989) Geometrical interpretation of the elements of the intuitionistic fuzzy objects. Preprint IM-MFAIS-1-89, Sofia
  2. Atanassov KT, Session VIS (1984) Sofia. Sgurev, V (Ed.). Central Sci. and Techn. Library, Bulg. Academy of Sciences (June 1983 )
  3. Garg H (2019b) New logarithmic operational laws and their aggregation operators for Pythagorean fuzzy set and their applications. Int J Intell Syst 34(1):82–106 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Almagrabi, A. O., Abdullah, S., Shams, M., Al-Otaibi, Y. D., & Ashraf, S.
Affiliations
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
  • Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan (PK)
Corresponding author
Shams, Maria
Venue
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing
Published
2021-04-05
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
1687-1713
ISSN
  • 1868-5137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-5145
OpenAlex
W3139668460
Cited by
114
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 6
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
King Abdulaziz University ((GCV19-10- 1441)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Fuzzy Systems and Optimization
Keywords
emergency decision support, COVID-19 pandemic, linear Diophantine fuzzy sets, aggregation operators, ranking algorithms, uncertainty aggregation, COVID-19 diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review