Cited by 95Stress and Burnout ResearchHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

Self-Compassion Explains Less Burnout Among Healthcare Professionals

Open access
Hashem, Zeena, Zeinoun, Pia·2020·Mindfulness

Abstract

Objectives Healthcare professionals are prone to experience burnout-a psychological syndrome resulting from chronic stressors at work. Some individual differences, like self-compassion-the non-judgmental observation of one's own pain and failure, while understanding that these are part of being human-can protect against burnout.Methods We administered the Maslach Burnout Inventory, the Self-Compassion Scale, and the Stressful Life Events Scale to a sample of healthcare professionals (medical residents, nurses, and physicians) in Lebanon (N = 93).Results The sample demonstrated a high degree of Emotional Exhaustion (M = 27, SD = 11.79), average levels of Depersonalization (M = 9.46, SD = 6.35), and Personal Accomplishment (M = 34.95, SD = 6.58), and moderate levels of Self-compassion (M = 3.25). All burnout components were significantly and inversely associated with self-compassion, with the strongest association found between Emotional Exhaustion and Self-compassion (r = -.37, p < .001). Self-compassion significantly explained burnout, above and beyond sociodemographic and occupational variables (Emotional Exhaustion: ΔR 2 = .11, F (1.85) = 12.71, p < .01; Depersonalization: ΔR 2 = .07, F (1.85) = 6.73, p = .01; Low Personal Accomplishment: ΔR 2 = .11, F (1.85) = 11.29, p < .01).Conclusions Burnout is prevalent in the sample, yet self-compassion may be a possible protective factor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-020-01469-5

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Taylor & Francis.
  2. Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (2018). Maslach burnout inventory manual (4th ed.). Mind Garden, Inc.
  3. Stamm, B.H. (2010). The concise ProQOL manual (2nd ed.) https:// proqol.org/uploads/ProQOLManual.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hashem, Z., & Zeinoun, P.
Affiliations
American University of Beirut (LB)
Corresponding author
Zeinoun, Pia
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2020-09-10
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
2542-2551
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W3086507007
Cited by
95
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
10.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
self-compassion, burnout, healthcare workers, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, occupational stress, medical residents, nurses, physicians, protective factors, life events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review