Cited by 6Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Mindfulness in persons with mild dementia and their caregivers: Exploring trait rumination as a clinical outcome measure

Open access
Keune, Philipp M., Bernard, Franziska, Meister, Regina, Keune, Jana, Springer, Romy, Arlt, Rüdiger, Holmerová, Iva, Auer, Stefanie +2 more·2023·Mindfulness

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been successfully applied to persons with dementia (PwD) and their caregivers and may yield beneficial effects on depression and quality of life. However, due to inconsistent results, it may be beneficial to re-examine mindfulness in PwD cross-sectionally to identify further potential therapeutic target variables. Rumination, the maladaptive disposition to excessively think about causes and consequences of symptoms and negative mood, may represent such a target. The current study sought to confirm the validity of trait rumination and the antagonistic relationship between mindfulness, rumination, and depression in PwD and their caregivers, as this may qualify rumination as a potential process and outcome variable in future MBIs. Method Forty patients with mild dementia completed a neuropsychological examination and provided self-report data on trait mindfulness, depression, and rumination. Self-report measures were also obtained from 30 caregivers. Regression analyses were used to examine the relation between mindfulness, depression, and rumination. We used clinical cutoffs for depression and rumination to estimate the practical implications of the opposing relationships between these variables. Results For PwD, mindfulness was significantly negatively correlated with depression and rumination, explaining 37% and 25% of variance, respectively. In PwD with low mindfulness scores, clinical depression and rumination syndromes occurred more frequently than in those with high mindfulness. Caregiver results were compatible. Conclusion Mindfulness shows an antagonistic relationship with clinically relevant rumination in PwD. Rumination may represent a relevant clinical outcome variable for future MBIs that can be reliably measured in PwD through validated self-report measures. Preregistration This study is not preregistered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-023-02192-7

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior work has documented associations between rumination and anxiety, depressive symptoms, and broader distress in dementia caregivers.

    “Prior work has documented associations between rumination and anxiety, depressive symptoms, and broader distress in dementia caregivers (Keune et al., 2023; Romero-Moreno et al., 2016).”

    From Mindfulness and rumination: stress pathways for caregivers of persons living with dementia. (2026) · cites this paper as Keune et al., 2023

    Table 5 reports significant correlations between both rumination measures and depressive symptoms in caregivers. The paper does not report associations between caregiver rumination and anxiety or broader distress, so those parts of the claim are not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hanson, A. E., Scogin, F. R., Welsh, D. L., & Karpe, J. M. (2004). Geriatric depression scale. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Instruments for adults (pp. 379-397).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keune, P. M., Bernard, F., Meister, R., Keune, J., Springer, R., Arlt, R., Holmerová, I., Auer, S., Oschmann, P., & Hansen, S.
Affiliations
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • Bayreuth Medical Center (DE)
  • Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
Corresponding author
Keune, Philipp M.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2023-08
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
1908-1917
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W4385633108
Cited by
6
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
trait rumination, mild dementia, dementia caregivers, depression, mindfulness-based interventions, clinical outcome measures, rumination syndrome, negative mood, therapeutic target

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review