Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mapping Mountain Peatlands and Wet Meadows Using Multi-Date, Multi-Sensor Remote Sensing in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru

Chimner, Rodney A., Bourgeau-Chavez, Laura, Grelik, Sarah, Hribljan, John A., Clarke, Ana Maria Planas, Polk, Molly H., Lilleskov, Erik A., Fuentealba, Beatriz·2019·Wetlands

Abstract

Wetlands (called bofedales in the Andes of Peru) are abundant and important components of many mountain ecosystems across the globe. They provide many benefits including water storage, high quality habitat, pasture, nutrient sinks and transformations, and carbon storage. The remote and rugged setting of mountain wetlands creates challenges for mapping, typically leading to misclassification and underestimates of wetland extent. We used multi-date, multi-sensor radar and optical imagery (Landsat TM/PALSAR/RADARSAT-1/SRTM DEM-TPI) combined with ground truthing for mapping wetlands in Huascarán National Park, Peru. We mapped bofedales into major wetland types: 1) cushion plant peatlands, 2) cushion plant wet meadows, and 3) graminoid wet meadows with an overall accuracy of 92%. A fourth wetland type was found (graminoid peatlands) but was too rare to map accurately, thus it was combined with cushion peatland to form a single peatland class. Total wetland area mapped in the National Park is 38,444 ha, which is 11% of the park area. Peatlands were the most abundant wetland type occupying 6.3% of the park, followed by graminoid wet meadows (3.5%) and cushion wet meadows (1.3%). These maps will serve as the foundation for improved management, including restoration, and estimates of landscape carbon stocks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13157-019-01134-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Anaya JA, Colditz RR, Valencia GM (2015) Land cover mapping of a tropical region by integrating multi-year data into an annual time series. Remote Sensing 7:16274–16292 · DOI
  2. Asner GP, Knapp DE, Martin RE, Tupayachi R, Anderson CB, Mascaro J, Sinca F, Chadwick KD, Higgins M, Farfan W, Llactayo W, Silman MR (2014) Targeted carbon conservation at national scales with high-resolution monitoring. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(47):E5016–E5022 · DOI
  3. Balslev H, Luteyn JL (eds) (1992) Páramo: an Andean ecosystem under human influence. Academic Press, London
  4. Benavides JC (2014) The effect of drainage on organic matter accumulation and plant communities of high-altitude peatlands in the Colombian tropical Andes. Mires and Peat 15:1–15
  5. Benavides JC, Vitt DH (2014) Response curves and the environmental limits for peat-forming species in the northern Andes. Plant Ecology 215:937–952 · DOI
  6. Billings WD, Mooney HA (1968) The ecology of arctic and alpine plants. Biological Reviews 43:481–529 · DOI
  7. Bosman A, van der Molen P, Young R, Cleef A (1993) Ecology of a paramo cushion mire. Journal of Vegetation Science 4:633–640 · DOI
  8. Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Endres S, Battaglia M, Miller ME, Banda E, Laubach Z, Higman P, Chow-Fraser P, Marcaccio J (2015) Development of a bi-National Great Lakes Coastal Wetland and land use map using 3-season PALSAR and Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing 7(7):8655–8682 · DOI
  9. Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Endres S, Powell R, Battaglia MJ, Benscoter B, Turetsky MR, Banda E (2017) Mapping boreal peatland ecosystem types from multi-temporal radar and optical satellite imagery. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 47:545–549 · DOI
  10. Brieman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning 45:5–32 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cavieres LA, Badano EI, Sierra-Almeida A, Molina-Montenegro MA (2007) Microclimatic modifications of cushion plants and their consequences for seedling survival of native and non-native herbaceous species in the high Andes of Central Chile. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 39:229–236 · DOI
  12. Chambers FM, Beilman DW, Yu Z (2011) Methods for determining peat humification and for quantifying peat bulk density, organic matter and carbon content for palaeostudies of climate and peatland carbon dynamics. Mires and Peat 7:1–10
  13. Chander G, Markham BL, Helder DL (2009) Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sensing of Environment 113:893–903 · DOI
  14. Chimner RA, Karberg JM (2008) Long-term carbon accumulation in two tropical mountain peatlands, Andes Mountains, Ecuador. Mires and Peat 3:1–10
  15. Chimner RA, Lemly JM, Cooper DJ (2010) Mountain fen distribution, types and restoration priorities, San Juan Mountains, Colorado, USA. Wetlands 30:1–9 · DOI
  16. Chimner RA, Bonvissuto GL, Cremona MV, Gaitan JJ, Lopez CR (2011) Ecohydrological conditions of wetlands along a precipitation gradient in Patagonia, Argentina. Ecología Austral 21:329–337
  17. Cleef AM (1979) The phytogeographical position of the neotropical vascular páramo flora with special reference to the Colombian cordillera oriental. In: Larsen, Holm-Nielsen (eds) Tropical botany. Academic Press, New York, pp 175–184
  18. Clewley D, Whitcomb J, Moghaddam M, McDonald K (2015) Mapping the state and dynamics of boreal wetlands using synthetic aperture radar. In: Tiner R, Lang M, Klemas V (eds) Remote sensing of wetlands: applications and advances. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 369–398 · DOI
  19. Cooper DJ, Wolf EC, Colson C, Vering W, Granda A, Meyer M (2010) Alpine peatlands of the Andes, Cajamarca, Peru. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 42:19–33 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Cooper DJ, Chimner RA, Merritt DM (2012) Western Mountain Wetlands. In: Baldwin AH, Batzer DP (eds) Wetland Habitats of North America: ecology and conservation concerns. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 313–328
  21. Earle LR, Warner B, Aravena R (2003) Rapid development of an unusual peat-accumulating ecosystem in the Chilean Altiplano. Quaternary Research 59:2–11 · DOI
  22. Enriquez AS, Chimner RA, Cremona MV, Diehl P, Bonvissuto GL (2015) Grazing intensity levels influence C reservoirs of wet and Mesic meadows along a precipitation gradient in northern Patagonia. Wetlands Ecology and Management 23:439–451 · DOI
  23. Eva HD, Belward AS, De Miranda EE, Di Bella CM, Gond V, Huber O, Jones S, Sgrenzaroli M, Fritz S (2004) A land cover map of South America. Global Change Biology 10:731–744 · DOI
  24. Gallego-Sala AV, Prentice IC (2013) Blanket peat biome endangered by climate change. Nature Climate Change 3(2):152–155 · DOI
  25. Garcia M, Brown S (2016) Characterization of carbon storage in small Andean wetlands of the upper Río Barbas watershed (Quindío, Colombia). Caldasia 38:117–135 · DOI
  26. Hribljan JA, Suárez E, Heckman KA, Lilleskov EA, Chimner RA (2016) Peatland carbon stocks and accumulation rates in the Ecuadorian páramo. Wetlands Ecology and Management 24:113–127 · DOI
  27. Hribljan JA, Suarez E, Bourgeau-Chavez L, Endres S, Lilleskov EA, Chimbolema S, Wayson C, Serocki E, Chimner RA (2017) Multidate, multisensor remote sensing reveals high density of carbon-rich mountain peatlands in the páramo of Ecuador. Global Change Biology 23:5412–5425 · DOI
  28. Josse C, Cuesta F, Navarro G et al (2011) Physical geography and ecosystems in the tropical Andes. In: Herzog SK, Martinez R, Jorgensen PM, Tiessen H (eds) Climate change and biodiversity in the tropical Andes. Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, Brazil, pp 152–169
  29. Kent M (2012) Vegetation description and data analysis: a practical approach, 2nd edn. Chichester, West Sussex, UK, Wiley-Blackwell
  30. Lottes AL, Ziegler AM (1994) World peat occurrence and the seasonality of climate and vegetation. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 106(1–4):23–37 · DOI
  31. Luteyn JL (1999) Páramos: A Checklist of Plant Diversity, Geographical Distribution, and Botanical Literature. New York Botanical Garden Press, Bronx
  32. Maldonado Fonken M (2014) An introduction to the bofedales of the Peruvian high Andes. Mires and Peat 15:1–13
  33. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach
  34. Olofsson P, Foody GM, Stehman SV, Woodcock CE (2013) Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies: estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation. Remote Sensing of Environment 129:122–131 · DOI
  35. Otto M, Gibbons RE (2017) Potential effects of projected decrease in annual rainfall on spatial distribution of high Andean wetlands in southern Peru. Wetlands 37:647–659 · DOI
  36. Otto M, Scherer D, Richters J (2011) Hydrological differentiation and spatial distribution of high altitude wetlands in a semi-arid Andean region derived from satellite data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15:1713–1727 · DOI
  37. Rebelo LS (2010) Eco-hydrological characterization of inland wetlands in Africa using L-band SAR. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 3:554–559 · DOI
  38. Rouse JW, Hass RH, Schell JA, Deering DW (1974) Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. A NASA Special Publication, Washington, DC, US
  39. Salvador F, Monerris J, Rochefort L (2014) Peatlands of the Peruvian Puna ecoregion: types, characteristics and disturbance. Mires and Peat 15:1–17
  40. Sánchez ME, Chimner RA, Hribljan JA, Lilleskov EA, Suárez E (2017) Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in grazed and undisturbed mountain peatlands in the Ecuadorian Andes. Mires and Peat 19:1–18
  41. Soil Survey Staff (2006) Keys to soil taxonomy, Tenth Edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC
  42. Squeo FA, Warner BG, Aravena R, Espinoza D (2006) Bofedales: high altitude peatlands of the Central Andes. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 79:245–255 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Viviroli D, Dürr HH, Messerli B, Meybeck M, Weingartner R (2007) Mountains of the world, water towers for humanity: Typology, mapping, and global significance. Water Resources Research 43:W07447 · DOI
  44. Weiss A (2001) Topographic position and landforms analysis. In Poster presentation (Vol. 200), ESRI user conference, San Diego
  45. Weiss DJ, Walsh SJ (2009) Remote sensing of mountain environments. Geography Compass 3:1–21 · DOI
  46. Whitcomb JB, Moghaddam M, McDonald K, Kellndorfer J, Podest E (2009) Mapping vegetated wetlands of Alaska using L-band radar satellite imagery. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 35:54–72 · DOI
  47. Wigmore O, Mark B, McKenzie J, Baraer M, Lautz L (2019) Sub-metre mapping of surface soil moisture in proglacial valleys of the tropical Andes using a multispectral unmanned aerial vehicle. Remote Sensing of Environment 222:104–118 · DOI
  48. Young KR (2009) Andean land use and biodiversity: humanized landscapes in a time of change. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden Missouri Botanical Garden 96:492–507 · DOI
  49. Young KR, León B, Cano A, Herrera-MacBryde O (1997) Peruvian Puna. In: Davis SD, Heywood VH, Herrera-MacBryde O et al (eds) Centres of plant diversity: a guide and strategy for their conservation. WWW and IUCN, Cambridge, pp 470–476

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chimner, R. A., Bourgeau-Chavez, L., Grelik, S., Hribljan, J. A., Clarke, A. M. P., Polk, M. H., Lilleskov, E. A., & Fuentealba, B.
Venue
Wetlands
Published
2019-03-22
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
1057-1067
ISSN
  • 0277-5212
  • 1943-6246
Cited by
52
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1617429)
  • USAID

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review