Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bofedales: high altitude peatlands of the central Andes

SQUEO, FRANCISCO A, WARNER, BARRY G, ARAVENA, RAMÓN, ESPINOZA, DIANA·2006·Revista chilena de historia natural

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4067/s0716-078x2006000200010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. MILLER A (1976) The climate of Chile. In: Schwerdtfeger W (ed) Climate of Central and South America: 113- 129. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  2. RECH JA, J QUADE & JL BETANCOURT (2002) Late Quaternary paleohydrology of the central Atacama desert (lat 22 o -24 o ), Chile. Geological Society of America Bulletin 114: 334-348.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
SQUEO, F. A., WARNER, B. G., ARAVENA, R., & ESPINOZA, D.
Venue
Revista chilena de historia natural
Published
2006-06
Volume
79
Issue
2
ISSN
0716-078X
Cited by
200
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review