Cited by 24Ethics and Social Impacts of AIEthics in Business and EducationImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

A theoretical framework to guide AI ethical decision making

Ferrell, O. C., Harrison, Dana E., Ferrell, Linda K., Ajjan, Haya, Hochstein, Bryan W.·2024·AMS Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13162-024-00275-9

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferrell, O. C., Harrison, D. E., Ferrell, L. K., Ajjan, H., & Hochstein, B. W.
Affiliations
  • Auburn University (US)
  • East Tennessee State University (US)
  • Elon University (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Ferrell, O. C.
Venue
AMS Review
Published
2024-04-13
Volume
14
Issue
1-2
Pages
53-67
ISSN
  • 1869-814X (ISSN-L)
  • 1869-8182
OpenAlex
W4394785463
Cited by
24
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AMS Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Keywords
AI ethics, ethical decision-making, organizational culture, organizational values and norms, autonomous AI systems, AI risk management, ethical principles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review