Cited by 66Algal biology and biofuel productionCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

CO2 recycling using microalgae for the production of fuels

Open access
Wilson, M. H., Groppo, J., Placido, A., Graham, S., Morton, S. A., Santillan-Jimenez, E., Shea, A., Crocker, M. +2 more·2014·Applied Petrochemical Research

Abstract

CO 2 capture and recycle using microalgae was demonstrated at a coal-fired power plant (Duke Energy’s East Bend Station, Kentucky). Using an in-house designed closed loop, vertical tube photobioreactor, Scenedesmus acutus was cultured using flue gas as the CO 2 source. Algae productivity of 39 g/(m 2 day) in June–July was achieved at significant scale (18,000 L), while average daily productivity slightly in excess of 10 g/(m 2 day) was demonstrated in the month of December. A protocol for low-cost algae harvesting and dewatering was developed, and the conversion of algal lipids—extracted from the harvested biomass—to diesel-range hydrocarbons via catalytic deoxygenation was demonstrated. Assuming an amortization period of 10 years, calculations suggest that the current cost of capturing and recycling CO 2 using this approach will fall close to $1,600/ton CO 2 , the main expense corresponding to the capital cost of the photobioreactor system and the associated installation cost. From this it follows that future cost reduction measures should focus on the design of a culturing system which is less expensive to build and install. In even the most optimistic scenario, the cost of algae-based CO 2 capture is unlikely to fall below $225/ton, corresponding to a production cost of ~$400/ton biomass. Hence, the value of the algal biomass produced will be critical in determining the overall economics of CO 2 capture and recycle.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13203-014-0052-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 66

Authors
Wilson, M. H., Groppo, J., Placido, A., Graham, S., Morton, S. A., Santillan-Jimenez, E., Shea, A., Crocker, M., Crofcheck, C., & Andrews, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • James Madison University (US)
Corresponding author
Crocker, M.
Venue
Applied Petrochemical Research
Published
2014-03-21
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
41-53
ISSN
  • 2190-5525 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-5533
OpenAlex
W2019253603
Cited by
66
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Petrochemical Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Duke Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
CO2 capture, CO2 recycling, microalgae, Scenedesmus acutus, flue gas, coal-fired power plants, photobioreactors, algal biomass productivity, catalytic deoxygenation, diesel-range hydrocarbons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review