The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rhizosphere microbiome: revisiting the synergy of plant-microbe interactions
Open accessAbstract
Sustainable enhancement in food production from less available arable land must encompass a balanced use of inorganic, organic, and biofertilizer sources of plant nutrients to augment and maintain soil fertility and productivity. The varied responses of microbial inoculants across fields and crops, however, have formed a major bottleneck that hinders its widespread adoption. This necessitates an intricate analysis of the inter-relationships between soil microbial communities and their impact on host plant productivity. The concept of “biased rhizosphere,” which evolved from the interactions among different components of the rhizosphere including plant roots and soil microflora, strives to garner a better understanding of the complex rhizospheric intercommunications. Moreover, knowledge on rhizosphere microbiome is essential for developing strategies for shaping the rhizosphere to benefit the plants. With the advent of molecular and “omics” tools, a better understanding of the plant-microbe association could be acquired which could play a crucial role in drafting the future “biofertilizers.” The present review, therefore aims to (a) to introduce the concepts of rhizosphere hotspots and microbiomes and (b) to detail out the methodologies for creating biased rhizospheres for plant-mediated selection of beneficial microorganisms and their roles in improving plant performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology
DEAN, R., VAN KAN, J. A. L., PRETORIUS, Z. A., HAMMOND‐KOSACK, K. E., DI PIETRO, A., SPANU, P. D., RUDD, J. J., DICKMAN, M., KAHMANN, R., ELLIS, J., et al. (2012) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x · Cited by 4,692
Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere
Philippot, L., Raaijmakers, J. M., Lemanceau, P., & van der Putten, W. H. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3109 · Cited by 3,883
Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice
Edwards, J., Johnson, C., Santos-Medellín, C., Lurie, E., Podishetty, N. K., Bhatnagar, S., Eisen, J. A., & Sundaresan, V. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1414592112 · Cited by 2,856
Mendes, R., Garbeva, P., & Raaijmakers, J. M. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12028 · Cited by 2,820
Deciphering the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Disease-Suppressive Bacteria
Mendes, R., Kruijt, M., de Bruijn, I., Dekkers, E., van der Voort, M., Schneider, J. H. M., Piceno, Y. M., DeSantis, T. Z., Andersen, G. L., Bakker, P. A. H. M., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1203980 · Cited by 2,800
Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology
MANSFIELD, J., GENIN, S., MAGORI, S., CITOVSKY, V., SRIARIYANUM, M., RONALD, P., DOW, M., VERDIER, V., BEER, S. V., MACHADO, M. A., et al. (2012) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x · Cited by 2,409
Zhalnina, K., Louie, K. B., Hao, Z., Mansoori, N., da Rocha, U. N., Shi, S., Cho, H., Karaoz, U., Loqué, D., Bowen, B. P., et al. (2018) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-018-0129-3 · Cited by 2,368
Regulation and function of root exudates
Badri, D. V., & Vivanco, J. M. (2008) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01926.x · Cited by 2,162
Cited by
Rhizosphere microbiome: Engineering bacterial competitiveness for enhancing crop production
Kumar, A., & Dubey, A. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2020.04.014 · Cited by 328
Khatoon, Z., Huang, S., Rafique, M., Fakhar, A., Kamran, M. A., & Santoyo, G. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111118 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohanram, S., & Kumar, P.
- Venue
- Annals of Microbiology
- Published
- 2019-02-23
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 307-320
- ISSN
- 0003-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 1590-4261
- 1869-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2917143850
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 123
- FWCI
- 17.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rhizosphere microbiome: revisiting the synergy of plant-microbe interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13213-019-01448-9
- The paper
- Mohanram, S., & Kumar, P. (2019). Rhizosphere microbiome: revisiting the synergy of plant-microbe interactions. Annals of Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-019-01448-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
