The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms
Open accessAbstract
Microbial communities play a pivotal role in the functioning of plants by influencing their physiology and development. While many members of the rhizosphere microbiome are beneficial to plant growth, also plant pathogenic microorganisms colonize the rhizosphere striving to break through the protective microbial shield and to overcome the innate plant defense mechanisms in order to cause disease. A third group of microorganisms that can be found in the rhizosphere are the true and opportunistic human pathogenic bacteria, which can be carried on or in plant tissue and may cause disease when introduced into debilitated humans. Although the importance of the rhizosphere microbiome for plant growth has been widely recognized, for the vast majority of rhizosphere microorganisms no knowledge exists. To enhance plant growth and health, it is essential to know which microorganism is present in the rhizosphere microbiome and what they are doing. Here, we review the main functions of rhizosphere microorganisms and how they impact on health and disease. We discuss the mechanisms involved in the multitrophic interactions and chemical dialogues that occur in the rhizosphere. Finally, we highlight several strategies to redirect or reshape the rhizosphere microbiome in favor of microorganisms that are beneficial to plant growth and health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing
MetaHIT Consortium, Qin, J., Li, R., Raes, J., Arumugam, M., Burgdorf, K. S., Manichanh, C., Nielsen, T., Pons, N., Levenez, F., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08821 · Cited by 11,624
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 · Cited by 5,347
Van Der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D., & Van Straalen, N. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x · Cited by 5,053
Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00335-09 · Cited by 4,063
Andrews, S. C., Robinson, A. K., & Rodríguez-Quiñones, F. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(03)00055-x · Cited by 2,702 · cited 1×
“…in many microbial habitats as well as the toxicity of free iron at elevated concentrations, bacteria employ a variety of mechanisms to regulate intracellular iron concentrations by secretion of siderophores (Lindsay & Schwab, 1982; Andrews et al., 2003; Buckling et al., 2007; Hider & Kong, 2010).”
BackgroundArchaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils
Leininger, S., Urich, T., Schloter, M., Schwark, L., Qi, J., Nicol, G. W., Prosser, J. I., Schuster, S. C., & Schleper, C. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04983 · Cited by 2,497
Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress
Yang, J., Kloepper, J. W., & Ryu, C.-M. (2009) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.004 · Cited by 1,852
Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution
Zilber-Rosenberg, I., & Rosenberg, E. (2008) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00123.x · Cited by 1,739
Chemistry and biology of siderophores
Hider, R. C., & Kong, X. (2010) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/b906679a · Cited by 1,722
Cited by
A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application
Compant, S., Samad, A., Faist, H., & Sessitsch, A. (2019) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.004 · Cited by 1,643
Plant root-microbe communication in shaping root microbiomes
Lareen, A., Burton, F., & Schäfer, P. (2016) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-015-0417-8 · Cited by 668
Alegbeleye, O. O., Singleton, I., & Sant’Ana, A. S. (2018) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2018.01.003 · Cited by 616
Beneficial Microorganisms for Corals (BMC): Proposed Mechanisms for Coral Health and Resilience
Peixoto, R. S., Rosado, P. M., Leite, D. C. D. A., Rosado, A. S., & Bourne, D. G. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00341 · Cited by 594
The plant microbiome explored: implications for experimental botany
Berg, G., Rybakova, D., Grube, M., & Köberl, M. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erv466 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Mendes, R., Garbeva, P., & Raaijmakers, J. M.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 634-663
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6976
- OpenAlex
- W2043103313
- Cited by
- 2,820
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 77.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1574-6976.12028
- The paper
- Mendes, R., Garbeva, P., & Raaijmakers, J. M. (2013). The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
