Cited by 141Interdisciplinary Research and CollaborationSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceLand Use and Ecosystem Services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Science with Society in the Anthropocene

Open access

Abstract

Interdisciplinary scientific knowledge is necessary but not sufficient when it comes to addressing sustainable transformations, as science increasingly has to deal with normative and value-related issues. A systems perspective on coupled human-environmental systems (HES) helps to address the inherent complexities. Additionally, a thorough interaction between science and society (i.e., transdisciplinarity = TD) is necessary, as sustainable transitions are sometimes contested and can cause conflicts. In order to navigate complexities regarding the delicate interaction of scientific research with societal decisions these processes must proceed in a structured and functional way. We thus propose HES-based TD processes to provide a basis for reorganizing science in coming decades.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13280-012-0363-5

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Scholz, R. W., A. Roy, F. S. Brand, D. T. Hellums, and A. E. Ullrich (eds.). in preparation. In Sustainable phosphorus management: A transdisciplinary roadmap. New York: Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Seidl, R., Brand, F. S., Stauffacher, M., Krütli, P., Le, Q. B., Spörri, A., Meylan, G., Moser, C., González, M. B., & Scholz, R. W.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Südzucker (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Seidl, Roman
Venue
AMBIO
Published
2013-01-04
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
5-12
ISSN
  • 0044-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1654-7209
OpenAlex
W1974918392
Cited by
140
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 2
FWCI
29.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AMBIO (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
Anthropocene, transdisciplinarity, science and society, sustainability transitions, systems approach, societal decision-making
MeSH terms
Science, Societies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review