Cited by 76Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisUrban and spatial planning

A social–ecological analysis of ecosystem services in two different farming systems

Open access
Andersson, Erik, Nykvist, Björn, Malinga, Rebecka, Jaramillo, Fernando, Lindborg, Regina·2015·AMBIO

Abstract

In this exploratory study we use existing in situ qualitative and quantitative data on biophysical and social indicators to compare two contrasting Swedish farming systems (low intensity and high intensity) with regard to ecosystem service supply and demand of a broad suite of services. We show that the value (demand) placed on a service is not necessarily connected to the quantity (supply) of the service, most clearly shown for the services recreation, biodiversity, esthetic experience, identity, and cultural heritage. To better capture this complexity we argue for the need to develop portfolios of indicators for different ecosystem services and to further investigate the different aspects of supply and demand. The study indicates that available data are often ill-suited to answer questions about local delivery of services. If ecosystem services are to be included in policy, planning, and management, census data need to be formatted and scaled appropriately.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13280-014-0603-y

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Patton MQ Qualitative research and evaluations methods 2002 3 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersson, E., Nykvist, B., Malinga, R., Jaramillo, F., & Lindborg, R.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Andersson, Erik
Venue
AMBIO
Published
2015-01
Volume
44
Issue
S1
Pages
102-112
ISSN
  • 0044-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1654-7209
OpenAlex
W2101285455
Cited by
76
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
8.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AMBIO (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Urban and spatial planning
Keywords
ecosystem services, social-ecological systems, agricultural systems, low-intensity farming, ecosystem service supply and demand, recreation, biodiversity, cultural heritage, social indicators, biophysical indicators, agricultural policy
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources, Ecosystem, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review