CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 145Climate change impacts on agricultureGender, Education, and Development IssuesSustainability and Climate Change Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Enhancing and expanding intersectional research for climate change adaptation in agrarian settings

Open access
Thompson-Hall, Mary, Carr, Edward R., Pascual, Unai·2016·Ambio
DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0827-0PMC PMC5120020
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Most current approaches focused on vulnerability, resilience, and adaptation to climate change frame gender and its influence in a manner out-of-step with contemporary academic and international development research. The tendency to rely on analyses of the sex-disaggregated gender categories of 'men' and 'women' as sole or principal divisions explaining the abilities of different people within a group to adapt to climate change, illustrates this problem. This framing of gender persists in spite of established bodies of knowledge that show how roles and responsibilities that influence a person´s ability to deal with climate-induced and other stressors emerge at the intersection of diverse identity categories, including but not limited to gender, age, seniority, ethnicity, marital status, and livelihoods. Here, we provide a review of relevant literature on this topic and argue that approaching vulnerability to climate change through intersectional understandings of identity can help improve adaptation programming, project design, implementation, and outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13280-016-0827-0

Cites

78 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Livelihoods as Intimate Government (LIG) four-step process. (1) Establishing current vulnerability context. (2) Identifying instances where logic and legitimacy of livelihoods strategies are questioned by those who participate in them. (3) Opens insights into the nexus of livelihoods strategy formation. (4) Leading to explanatory interpretation of livelihoods outcomes (Carr 2014: 114)
Fig. 1 Livelihoods as Intimate Government (LIG) four-step process. (1) Establishing current vulnerability context. (2) Identifying instances where logic and legitimacy of livelihoods strategies are questioned by those who participate in them. (3) Opens insights into the nexus of livelihoods strategy formation. (4) Leading to explanatory interpretation of livelihoods outcomes (Carr 2014: 114)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Relief Map for a girl living in Manresa, Catalonia, illustrating her lived experience of integrated dimensions of power, space, and oppression/privilege as she moves through different areas of her hometown (Rodó-de-Zárate 2014, p. 929)
Fig. 2 Relief Map for a girl living in Manresa, Catalonia, illustrating her lived experience of integrated dimensions of power, space, and oppression/privilege as she moves through different areas of her hometown (Rodó-de-Zárate 2014, p. 929)CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Babugura, A., N.C. Mtshali, and M. Mtshali. 2010. Gender and climate change: South Africa case study. Cape Town: Publication of the Heinrich Böll Foundation.
  2. Brody, A., J. Demetriades, and E. Esplen. 2008. Gender and climate change: Mapping the linkages, a scoping study on knowledge and gaps. Sussex: BRIDGE, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
  3. Carr, E. R., and M. C. Thompson. 2013. Gender and climate change adaptation in agrarian settings. Report prepared for the United States Agency for International Development. pp. 76.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–145 of 145

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Thompson-Hall, M., Carr, E. R., & Pascual, U.
Affiliations
  • Clark University (US)
  • Ikerbasque (ES)
Corresponding author
Pascual, Unai
ORCID
Venue
Ambio
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-11-22
Volume
45
Issue
S3
Pages
373-382
ISSN
  • 0044-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1654-7209
DOI
10.1007/s13280-016-0827-0
PMC
PMC5120020
OpenAlex
W2549794930
Cited by
145
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • AMBIO (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Clark Digital Commons (Clark University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
intersectionality, climate change adaptation, farmer livelihoods, gender, vulnerability, resilience, identity categories
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Agriculture, Developing Countries, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Research, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review