Cited by 2,542Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceSocial Capital and NetworksDisaster Management and Resilience

Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change

Adger, W. Neil·2003·Economic Geography

Abstract

Abstract: Future changes in climate pose significant challenges for society, not the least of which is how best to adapt to observed and potential future impacts of these changes to which the world is already committed. Adaptation is a dynamic social process: the ability of societies to adapt is determined, in part, by the ability to act collectively. This article reviews emerging perspectives on collective action and social capital and argues that insights from these areas inform the nature of adaptive capacity and normative prescriptions of policies of adaptation. Specifically, social capital is increasingly understood within economics to have public and private elements, both of which are based on trust, reputation, and reciprocal action. The public‐good aspects of particular forms of social capital are pertinent elements of adaptive capacity in interacting with natural capital and in relation to the performance of institutions that cope with the risks of changes in climate. Case studies are presented of present‐day collective action for coping with extremes in weather in coastal areas in Southeast Asia and of community‐based coastal management in the Caribbean. These cases demonstrate the importance of social capital framing both the public and private institutions of resource management that build resilience in the face of the risks of changes in climate. These cases illustrate, by analogy, the nature of adaptation processes and collective action in adapting to future changes in climate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00220.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Communities in both Northern Uganda and Turkana have developed resilience strategies to cope with climate changes.

    “Despite these challenges, communities in both Northern Uganda and Turkana have developed resilience strategies to cope with these changes.”
  • Resilience strategies in Northern Uganda and Turkana reflect a combination of traditional knowledge, innovative practices, and external support, highlighting the adaptive capacity of local populations.

    “These strategies reflect a combination of traditional knowledge, innovative practices, and external support, highlighting the adaptive capacity of local populations in the face of climate change (Adger, 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adger, W. N.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Adger, W. Neil
Venue
Economic Geography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
387-404
ISSN
  • 0013-0095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8287
OpenAlex
W2153640166
Cited by
2,542
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 135 · 2025: 125 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 185 · 2020: 147 · 2019: 161 · 2018: 197 · 2017: 159 · 2016: 170 · 2015: 157 · 2014: 152 · 2013: 153 · 2012: 119
FWCI
15.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economic Geography (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
Keywords
social capital, collective action, climate change adaptation, adaptive capacity, trust, reputation, reciprocal action, public goods, natural capital, institutions, coastal communities, extreme weather events, community-based coastal management, resilience, climate risk, adaptation policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review