Cited by 11Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Clinical Inertia in Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Obesity: An Observational Retrospective Study

Open access
Romera, Irene, Díaz, Silvia, Sicras-Mainar, Antoni, López-Simarro, Flora, Dilla, Tatiana, Artime, Esther, Reviriego, Jesús·2020·Diabetes Therapy

Abstract

To evaluate clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity and poor glycaemic control in routine clinical practice. This was a retrospective, observational study based on the analysis of medical records from the BIG-PAC® database. Subjects who required medical care in 2013 with the following characteristics were enrolled in the study: age ≥ 30 years, diagnosis of T2DM, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 8%, obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ) and treatment with ≥ 2 oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Inertia was evaluated by time (days) to the first intensification during the period while HbA1c levels were ≥ 8% and percentage of patients whose treatment was not intensified at 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years and the end of follow-up. The minimum length of follow-up was 4 years. Descriptive analyses and Kaplan–Meier survival curves were performed. A total of 13,824 patients with T2DM receiving ≥ 2 OADs were identified; of these 2709 (19.6%) had HbA1c ≥ 8% and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 , thus fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Of these 2709 patients, the mean age was 65.5 (standard deviation [SD] 12.0) years; 54.9% were male, mean HbA1c level was 9.2% (SD 1.3%); mean BMI was 32.1 (SD 0.9) kg/m 2 ; and mean time from diagnosis was 8.2 (SD 3.0) years. HbA1c remained ≥ 8% for a median of 440 (95% confidence interval [CI] 421–459) days. The median time to first intensification was 456 (95% CI 429–483) days. No intensification had occurred in 77.8, 59.5, 41.5, 28.1 and 22.4% of patients at 6 months, 1, 2, 3 years and the end of follow-up, respectively. The patients with T2DM analysed in this study had a mean HbA1c of 9.2% at baseline, and this remained at ≥ 8% for > 1 year. The time to the first treatment intensification was longer than that recommended by guidelines. Treatment was not intensified in a large percentage of patients, with almost 60% of patients not receiving intensification at 1 year of follow-up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13300-019-00745-5

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]Arrieta F, Iglesias P, Pedro-Botet J, et al. Diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk: Working group recommendations of Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease of the Spanish Society of Diabetes (SED, 2015). Aten Primaria. 2016;48:325–36. PMC6877822 26031458
  2. [12]González-Clemente JM, Font B, Lahoz R, Llauradó G, Gambús G; Grupo de investigadores del Estudio INERCIA. INERTIA study: Clinical inertia in non-insulinized patients on oral hypoglycemic treatment. A study in Spanish primary and specialty care settings. Med Clin (Barc). 2014;142:478–84 (in Spanish). 23622897
  3. [32]Kulzer B. Adherence problems and clinical inertia. 11 strategies keeping patients with diabetes onboard. MMW Fortschr Med. 2017;159:67–72. 28265910

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romera, I., Díaz, S., Sicras-Mainar, A., López-Simarro, F., Dilla, T., Artime, E., & Reviriego, J.
Affiliations
Eli Lilly (Spain) (ES)
Corresponding author
Romera, Irene
Venue
Diabetes Therapy
Published
2019-12-28
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
437-451
ISSN
  • 1869-6953 (ISSN-L)
  • 1869-6961
OpenAlex
W2997853913
Cited by
11
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
clinical inertia, type 2 diabetes, obesity, poor glycaemic control, HbA1c, oral antidiabetic drugs, treatment intensification, real-world clinical practice, treatment non-adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review