Cited by 23Celiac Disease Research and ManagementWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyEosinophilic Esophagitis

Intraepithelial lymphocytes subsets in different forms of celiac disease

Open access
Sánchez-Castañon, M., Castro, B. G., Toca, M., Santacruz, C., Arias-Loste, M., Iruzubieta, P., Crespo, J., López-Hoyos, Marcos·2016·Autoimmunity Highlights

Abstract

AIM: The enumeration of intraepithelial lymphocytes subsets (total, γδ, and CD3(-) IELs) by flow cytometry (FCM), named as IEL lymphogram, constitutes a useful tool for celiac disease (CD) diagnosis. The aim of this study was to quantify IELs by FCM and their diagnostic value to differentiate active, silent and potential CD. METHODS: Prospective study of 60 active and 20 silent CD patients, and 161 controls in which duodenal biopsy and IEL quantification by FCM was performed. RESULTS: Active and silent CD patients had significant higher levels of both total and γδ IELs than absent CD patients (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, P = 0.012 and P < 0.011; respectively). Active and silent CD patients had significant lower levels of CD3(-) IELs than absent CD patients (P < 0.047 and P < 0.009, respectively). Moreover, they were lower in silent than in active CD patients (P = 0.002). Changes of IELs subsets were more marked in children than adults active CD. The optimal IEL lymphogram cut off values for active CD diagnosis were: ≥10, ≥15 and ≤9 %, and with better performance characteristics for silent CD: ≥ 11, ≥10 and ≤5 %. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of IELs subsets by FCM is useful to confirm diagnosis of active and silent CD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13317-016-0085-y

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The diagnostic efficacy of the assessment of iIELs by flow cytometry has been confirmed for the differentiation of active celiac disease patients, celiac disease in remission and subclinical or potential celiac disease in both pediatric and adult patients.

    “The diagnostic efficacy of the assessment of iIELs by flow cytometry has been confirmed for the differentiation of active celiac disease patients, Celiac disease in remission and subclinical or potential celiac disease in both pediatric and adult patients [315-318]”

    From Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (third edition) (2021) · cites this paper as [317]

    The Results report diagnostic performance of flow-cytometric IEL assessment for active and silent celiac disease, including separate analyses of children and adults with active disease. The Methods identify no remission group, and the Discussion says the authors lack conclusive data on potential celiac disease. Thus the source does not confirm the full range of differentiation claimed. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Maki M Holm K Collin P Savilahti E Increase in gamma/delta T cell receptor bearing lymphocytes in normal small bowel mucosa in latent coeliac disease Gut 1991 32 1412 1414 10.1136/gut.32.11.1412 1836446 PMC1379179 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sánchez-Castañon, M., Castro, B. G., Toca, M., Santacruz, C., Arias-Loste, M., Iruzubieta, P., Crespo, J., & López-Hoyos, M.
Affiliations
Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (ES)
Venue
Autoimmunity Highlights
Published
2016-09-23
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
14-14
ISSN
  • 2038-0305 (ISSN-L)
  • 2038-3274
OpenAlex
W2521494116
Cited by
23
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autoimmunity Highlights (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
IDIVAL (Lopez-Albo grant, CI 10/52, CI 13/10)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Keywords
celiac disease, intraepithelial lymphocytes, γδ T cells, silent celiac disease, duodenal biopsy, diagnostic thresholds, pediatric celiac disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review