The DOI matches its Crossref record; 167 of the 167 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current hurdles to the translation of nanomedicines from bench to the clinic
Open accessAbstract
The field of nanomedicine has significantly influenced research areas such as drug delivery, diagnostics, theranostics, and regenerative medicine; however, the further development of this field will face significant challenges at the regulatory level if related guidance remains unclear and unconsolidated. This review describes those features and pathways crucial to the clinical translation of nanomedicine and highlights considerations for early-stage product development. These include identifying those critical quality attributes of the drug product essential for activity and safety, appropriate analytical methods (physical, chemical, biological) for characterization, important process parameters, and adequate pre-clinical models. Additional concerns include the evaluation of batch-to-batch consistency and considerations regarding scaling up that will ensure a successful reproducible manufacturing process. Furthermore, we advise close collaboration with regulatory agencies from the early stages of development to assure an aligned position to accelerate the development of future nanomedicines. Graphical abstract
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery
Blanco, E., Shen, H., & Ferrari, M. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3330 · Cited by 7,002 · cited 1×
“Targeted and non-targeted nanomedicines can improve the stability and solubility of associated active payloads, promote transport across membranes, and prolong circulation times to increase safety and efficacy [2, 3].”
BackgroundCancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities
Shi, J., Kantoff, P. W., Wooster, R., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.108 · Cited by 5,873
Doxil® — The first FDA-approved nano-drug: Lessons learned
Barenholz, Y. (. (2012) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.020 · Cited by 4,792
Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip
Huh, D., Matthews, B. D., Mammoto, A., Montoya-Zavala, M., Hsin, H. Y., & Ingber, D. E. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188302 · Cited by 4,250
Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles
Alexis, F., Pridgen, E., Molnar, L. K., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2008) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp800051m · Cited by 3,699
Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
Begley, C. G., & Ellis, L. M. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/483531a · Cited by 2,979
Edmondson, R., Broglie, J. J., Adcock, A. F., & Yang, L. (2014) · ASSAY and Drug Development Technologies · doi:10.1089/adt.2014.573 · Cited by 2,515
Nanomedicine in cancer therapy: Challenges, opportunities, and clinical applications
Wicki, A., Witzigmann, D., Balasubramanian, V., & Huwyler, J. (2015) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.12.030 · Cited by 1,901
Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
Prinz, F., Schlange, T., & Asadullah, K. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3439-c1 · Cited by 1,888
Targeted nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates for cancer chemotherapy in vivo
Farokhzad, O. C., Cheng, J., Teply, B. A., Sherifi, I., Jon, S., Kantoff, P. W., Richie, J. P., & Langer, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601755103 · Cited by 1,663
Cited by
Clinical translation of nanomedicines: Challenges, opportunities, and keys
Younis, M. A., Tawfeek, H. M., Abdellatif, A. A. H., Abdel-Aleem, J. A., & Harashima, H. (2022) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.114083 · Cited by 462
Biosafety of mesoporous silica nanoparticles; towards clinical translation
Lérida-Viso, A., Estepa-Fernández, A., García-Fernández, A., Martí-Centelles, V., & Martínez-Máñez, R. (2023) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2023.115049 · Cited by 279
Sabit, H., Pawlik, T. M., Radwan, F., Abdel-Hakeem, M., Abdel-Ghany, S., Wadan, A.-H. S., Elzawahri, M., El-Hashash, A., & Arneth, B. (2025) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-025-02357-z · Cited by 239
Ultrasmall silica nanoparticles in translational biomedical research: Overview and outlook
Singh, N., Shi, S., & Goel, S. (2023) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2022.114638 · Cited by 35
Clinical translation of nanomedicines for brain diseases: Current challenges and future directions
Wang, G., Wang, N., Xia, X., Ismail, M., & Shi, B. (2026) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114426 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Đorđević, S., Gonzalez, M. M., Conejos-Sánchez, I., Carreira, B., Pozzi, S., Acúrcio, R. C., Satchi-Fainaro, R., Florindo, H. F., & Vicent, M. J.
- Venue
- Drug Delivery and Translational Research
- Published
- 2021-07-23
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 500-525
- ISSN
- 2190-393X (ISSN-L)
- 2190-3948
- OpenAlex
- W3184755963
- Cited by
- 657
- References
- 167
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current hurdles to the translation of nanomedicines from bench to the clinic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13346-021-01024-2
- The paper
- Đorđević, S., Gonzalez, M. M., Conejos-Sánchez, I., Carreira, B., Pozzi, S., Acúrcio, R. C., Satchi-Fainaro, R., Florindo, H. F., & Vicent, M. J. (2022). Current hurdles to the translation of nanomedicines from bench to the clinic. Drug Delivery and Translational Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-021-01024-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.