The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Another point is that increased used of data, and the translation of all aspects of human action into data is that such quantification by necessity involves multiple stages of human interpretation, challenging the objective veneer of big data-based decision making [21,34,36].”
From A shallow defence of a technocracy of artificial intelligence: Examining the political harms of algorithmic governance in the domain of government (2020) · cites this paper as [36]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Whether we like it or not, algorithms are increasingly being used to nudge, bias, guide, provoke, control, manipulate and constrain human behaviour.”
From Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence (2017) · cites this paper as Danaher, 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In public-law terms, the concern is not only whether AI improves efficiency but also whether algorithmic assistance remains compatible with accountable justification, discretionary control, and rule-of-law legitimacy (Danaher, 2016;Binns, 2018;Busuioc, 2021).”
From From Human Oversight to Cognitive Sovereignty: A Process-Based Governance Standard for AI-Assisted Legal Reasoning (2026) · cites this paper as Danaher, 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In this sense, Cognitive Sovereignty responds to the threat of algocracy: the risk that governance becomes dependent on decision systems whose operation is not meaningfully contestable by the persons subject to them (Danaher, 2016).”
From From Human Oversight to Cognitive Sovereignty: A Process-Based Governance Standard for AI-Assisted Legal Reasoning (2026) · cites this paper as Danaher, 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This may lead to ‘algocracy’, in which ‘the legitimacy of public decision-making processes’ is thwarted by ‘the opacity of certain algocratic governance systems’ (Danaher, 2016).”
From Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason (2018) · cites this paper as Danaher, 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“were similar to concepts used in the pre-existing literature on the problems of algorithmic governance (e.g. Danaher, 2016; Zarsky, 2016)”
From Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence (2017) · cites this paper as Danaher, 2016
In the citing paper
“For example, as mentioned in [28], 'the human may want to guard against certain kinds of discrimination, and their notion of fairness may be too abstract to be completely encoded into the system'”
From Beyond explainability: justifiability and contestability of algorithmic decision systems (2022) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polanyi, M. (1997) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-x · Cited by 12,410
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7 · Cited by 6,333 · cited 1×
“Within the philosophy of mind, there is a school of thought that endorses the ‘extended mind thesis’ (Clark & Chalmers 1998; Clark 2010).”
BackgroundThe second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.184834 · Cited by 4,409
Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-6804 · Cited by 3,657
(1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,259
Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence.
Meehl, P. E. (1954) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/11281-000 · Cited by 2,227
Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-0788 · Cited by 2,205
Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension
Clark, A. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001 · Cited by 2,201
Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies
Bostrom, N. (2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.187536 · Cited by 1,998
The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies
Dong, X., & McIntyre, S. H. (2014) · Quantitative Finance · doi:10.1080/14697688.2014.946440 · Cited by 1,759
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Clark, A. (2010). Supersizing the mind. Oxford: OUP.
- Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2014). Big data and due process: towards a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. Boston College Law Review, 55, 93.
- Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse ethics: notes on a program of philosophical justification. In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Trans. Christian Lenhart and Shierry Weber Nicholson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Pentland, A. (2014). Social Physics. London: Penguin Press
- Seaver, N. (2013). Knowing algorithms. In Media in Transition 8, Cambridge MA
- Zarsky, T. (2013). Transparent prediction. University of Illinois Law Review, 4, 1504.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 519
Bridging the gap: the case for an ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreement’ on AI policy
Stix, C., & Maas, M. M. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-020-00037-w · Cited by 29
Making the black box society transparent
Innerárity, D. (2021) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-01130-8 · Cited by 30
Toward best practices in embedded ethics: Suggestions for interdisciplinary technology development
Tigard, D. W., Braun, M., Breuer, S., Ritt, K., Fiske, A., McLennan, S., & Buyx, A. (2023) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2023.104467 · Cited by 29
The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence
Sudmann, A. (2019) · AI critique · doi:10.14361/9783839447192 · Cited by 55
Vogl, T. M., Seidelin, C., Ganesh, B., & Bright, J. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3327804 · Cited by 26
The Concept of Accountability in AI Ethics and Governance
Lechterman, T. M. (2022) · The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.10 · Cited by 23
The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence
Sudmann, A. (2019) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783839447192 · Cited by 23
Knell, S., & Rüther, M. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00273-w · Cited by 23
The achievement gap thesis reconsidered: artificial intelligence, automation, and meaningful work
Scripter, L. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01828-5 · Cited by 22
Artificial intelligence and human autonomy: the case of driving automation
Fossa, F. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-01955-7 · Cited by 23
Renz, S., Kalimeris, J., Hofreiter, S., & Spörrle, M. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123760 · Cited by 27
What drives the performance of tax administrations? Evidence from selected european countries
Milosavljević, M., Radovanović, S., & Delibasic, B. (2023) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106217 · Cited by 20
Steen, M., Timan, T., & van de Poel, I. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00063-2 · Cited by 25
Digital risks and Islamic FinTech: a road map to social justice and financial inclusion
Alsaghir, M. (2023) · Journal of Islamic accounting and business research · doi:10.1108/jiabr-10-2022-0262 · Cited by 21
Organized Futures. On the Ambiguity of the Digital Absorption of Uncertainty
Wendt, T. G. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.554336 · Cited by 20
van Voorst, R. (2024) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings Digital Health · doi:10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.08.004 · Cited by 25
Algorithms and Posthuman Governance
Hughes, J. (2017) · Journal of Posthuman Studies · doi:10.5325/jpoststud.1.2.0166 · Cited by 19
Filgueiras, F. D. B. (2021) · Reforma y democracia. · doi:10.69733/clad.ryd.n79.a221 · Cited by 24
A Capability Approach to AI Ethics
Ratti, E., & Graves, M. (2025) · American Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.5406/21521123.62.1.01 · Cited by 21
Opening the black box: Petri nets and Privacy by Design
Diver, L., & Schäfer, B. (2017) · International Review of Law Computers & Technology · doi:10.1080/13600869.2017.1275123 · Cited by 20
Nersessian, D. L. (2018) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.07.006 · Cited by 19
Sparrow, R. (2020) · The International Encyclopedia of Ethics · doi:10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee870 · Cited by 19
Mölders, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-41172-5_6 · Cited by 18
Staszkiewicz, P., Horobiowski, J., Szelągowska, A., & Strzelecka, A. M. (2024) · Meditari Accountancy Research · doi:10.1108/medar-10-2023-2204 · Cited by 29
A Comprehensive Ethical Framework for AI Entities: Foundations
Dameski, A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97676-1_5 · Cited by 18
Vogl, T. M., Seidelin, C., Ganesh, B., & Bright, J. (2019) · Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3325112.3325240 · Cited by 21
The impact of advanced AI systems on democracy
Summerfield, C., Argyle, L. P., Bakker, M. A., Collins, T., Durmus, E., Eloundou, T., Gabriel, I., Ganguli, D., Hackenburg, K., Hadfield, G. K., et al. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02309-z · Cited by 65
Algorithmic Opacity: Making Algorithmic Processes Transparent through Abstraction Hierarchy
Paudyal, P., & Wong, B. L. W. (2018) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931218621046 · Cited by 17
Wendt, T. G. (2021) · Organisation und Pädagogik · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-33379-9_19 · Cited by 19
Moral transparency of and concerning algorithmic tools
Hayes, P., van de Poel, I., & Steen, M. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00190-4 · Cited by 26
Criminology in the age of data explosion: New directions
Ozkan, T. (2018) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2018.10.010 · Cited by 18
The Ethics of Algorithmic Outsourcing in Everyday Life
Danaher, J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198838494.003.0005 · Cited by 18
Self-citationTechnological Answerability and the Severance Problem: Staying Connected by Demanding Answers
Tigard, D. W. (2021) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-021-00334-5 · Cited by 18
Park, J.-S., Karahalios, K. G., Salehi, N., & Eslami, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3512957 · Cited by 16
Coordinating Distributed Speaking Objects
Lippi, M., Mamei, M., Mariani, S., & Zambonelli, F. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2017.282 · Cited by 17
The ghost in the legal machine: algorithmic governmentality, economy, and the practice of law
Harkens, A. (2018) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-09-2016-0038 · Cited by 17
Ahmad, K., Maabreh, M., Ghaly, M., Khan, K., Qadir, J., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.09110 · Cited by 20
Beyond efficiency: Trust, AI, and surprise in knowledge work environments
Brown, A. S., Dishop, C. R., Kuznetsov, A. V., Chao, P.-Y., & Woolley, A. W. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108605 · Cited by 19
Lavie, D., Pollicino, O., & Valletti, T. (2025) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2023.0421 · Cited by 15
Buchanan, R. (2020) · Policy Futures in Education · doi:10.1177/1478210320910293 · Cited by 15
Trolls maintained: baiting technological infrastructures of informational justice
Kerr, E. T., & Lee, C. A. L. (2019) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1623903 · Cited by 15
Algorithmic legitimacy in clinical decision-making
Holm, S. (2023) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-023-09709-7 · Cited by 16
La gobernanza de la inteligencia artificial: contexto y parámetros generales
Carrillo, M. R. (2020) · Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales · doi:10.17103/reei.39.07 · Cited by 14
Artificial intelligence and democracy: pathway to progress or decline?
Chehoudi, R. (2025) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2025.2473994 · Cited by 18
Artificial intelligence in the practice of work
Heinlein, M., & Huchler, N. (2023) · Work Organisation Labour & Globalisation · doi:10.13169/workorgalaboglob.17.1.0034 · Cited by 16
Social trust and public digitalization
van Kersbergen, K., & Svendsen, G. T. (2022) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01570-4 · Cited by 19
AI and bureaucratic discretion
Vredenburgh, K. (2023) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2023.2261468 · Cited by 13
Alnemr, N. (2023) · Contemporary Political Theory · doi:10.1057/s41296-023-00656-y · Cited by 12
KAMU YÖNETİMİNDE ALGORİTMALARIN EGEMENLİĞİ: ALGOKRASİ VE TEHDİTLERİ
Polat, M. (2024) · Kamu Yönetimi ve Teknoloji Dergisi · doi:10.58307/kaytek.1495010 · Cited by 14
Conceptualizing Automated Decision-Making in Organizational Contexts
Boos, A. K. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00773-5 · Cited by 17
Traditions, Myths, and Utopias of Personhood: An Introduction
Selkälä, T., & Rajavuori, M. (2017) · German Law Journal · doi:10.1017/s2071832200022240 · Cited by 12
DoCarmo, T. E., Rea, S. C., Conaway, E., Emery, J. R., & Raval, N. (2021) · Law & Policy · doi:10.1111/lapo.12164 · Cited by 16
Raz, D., Bintz, C., Guetler, V., Tam, A., Katell, M. A., Dailey, D., Herman, B., Krafft, P. M., & Young, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462627 · Cited by 15
Monteiro, J. I. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84748-6_9 · Cited by 11
Milella, F., & Cabitza, F. (2026) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make8020036 · Cited by 11
Socialni odnosi, animizem, antropomorfizem in interakcija z UI
Babić, N. Č. (2022) · doi:10.18690/um.ff.11.2022.12 · Cited by 10
YAPAY ZEKANIN DENETİMDE KULLANILMASI VE ETİK SORUNLAR
Polat, M. (2024) · Sayıştay Dergisi · doi:10.52836/sayistay.1554497 · Cited by 18
Mapping the Issues of Automated Legal Systems: Why Worry About Automatically Processable Regulation?
Guitton, C., Tamò‐Larrieux, A., & Mayer, S. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-022-09323-w · Cited by 12
Datenreiche Medizin und das Problem der Einwilligung
Richter, G., Loh, W., Buyx, A., von Kielmansegg, S. G., & GmbH, S.-V. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-62987-1 · Cited by 11
Algorithms, contexts, governance: An introduction to the special issue
Gritsenko, D., Markham, A. N., Pötzsch, H., & Wijermars, M. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221079037 · Cited by 12
Old Facts, New Beginnings: Thinking with Arendt about Algorithmic Decision-Making
Herzog, L. M. (2021) · The Review of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0034670521000474 · Cited by 13
Decision Time: Normative Dimensions of Algorithmic Speed
Susser, D. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533198 · Cited by 14
From access and transparency to refusal: Three responses to algorithmic governance
James, A., Hynes, D., Whelan, A., Dreher, T., & Humphry, J. (2023) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2023.2.1691 · Cited by 15
van Voorst, R. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02177-7 · Cited by 13
Algocracia: Uma análise crítica sobre a gestão mediada por algoritmos
Neves, I. B. S., Vianna, F. R. P. M., & Sutil, B. D. N. (2021) · Contextus - Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão · doi:10.19094/contextus.2021.67949 · Cited by 13
Ethical machine decisions and the input-selection problem
Lundgren, B. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03296-0 · Cited by 10
Recht im Sog der digitalen Transformation
Hoffmann‐Riem, W. (2021) · Mohr Siebeck eBooks · doi:10.1628/978-3-16-161200-8 · Cited by 10
Künstliche Intelligenz und Ethik im Gesundheitswesen – Spagat oder Symbiose?
Küster, D., & Schultz, T. (2023) · Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz · doi:10.1007/s00103-022-03653-5 · Cited by 12
„Computer says no“? Konsequenzen der Algorithmisierung von Entscheidungsprozessen
Kette, S. (2021) · Soziale Systeme · doi:10.1515/sosys-2021-0006 · Cited by 12
The Impact of Digital Technology on WorkPreprint
González, S. M. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3353258 · Cited by 10
Parviainen, J., Koski, A., Eilola, L., Palukka, H., Kuusipalo, P., & Lindholm, C. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14030178 · Cited by 13
The Artificial Intelligence Influence on Structure of Power: Long-Term Transformation
Nizov, V. (2025) · Legal Issues in the Digital Age · doi:10.17323/2713-2749.2025.2.183.212 · Cited by 15
Fortes, P. R. B. (2021) · Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de México · doi:10.22201/fder.24488933e.2021.279-1.78811 · Cited by 9
Analysing and organising human communications for AI fairness assessment
Dankloff, M., Skoric, V., Sileno, G., Ghebreab, S., van Ossenbruggen, J., & Beauxis-Aussalet, E. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-01974-4 · Cited by 12
Why Internal Moral Enhancement Might Be politically Better than External Moral Enhancement
Danaher, J. (2016) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9273-8 · Cited by 9
Self-citationRahman, R. A., Hajdú, J., & Prabowo, V. N. (2024) · Volksgeist Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi · doi:10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1.10366 · Cited by 8
The meaningfulness gap in AI ethics: a guide on how to think through a complex challenge
Rüther, M. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-01993-1 · Cited by 8
The Root of Algocratic Illegitimacy
Volkov, M. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00879-4 · Cited by 10
Latzer, M. (2025) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103115 · Cited by 8
Ceva, E., & Jiménez, M. C. (2022) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-022-09670-x · Cited by 12
Jarke, J., Prietl, B., Egbert, S., Boeva, Y., Heuer, H., & Arnold, M. (2024) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9789048556908 · Cited by 18
„Hello World“ – Systemtheoretische Überlegungen zu einer Soziologie des Algorithmus
Harth, J., & Lorenz, C.-F. (2017) · kommunikation gesellschaft · doi:10.15460/kommges.2017.18.2.588 · Cited by 9
Legitimacy and automated decisions: the moral limits of algocracy
Chomanski, B. (2022) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-022-09647-w · Cited by 13
Digital Economy and Digital Divide
Lombardi, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-97417-6_48-1 · Cited by 10
Redes sociais como modelo de governança algorítmica
de Castro, J. C. L. (2018) · Matrizes · doi:10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v12i2p165-191 · Cited by 15
Elyamany, N. A. (2024) · International Journal of Legal Discourse · doi:10.1515/ijld-2024-2003 · Cited by 9
Artificial Intelligence: The Biggest Threat to Democracy Today?
Nie, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series · doi:10.1609/aaaiss.v3i1.31239 · Cited by 7
Deep mechanism design: Learning social and economic policies for human benefit
Tacchetti, A., Koster, R., Balaguer, J., Leqi, L., Pislar, M., Botvinick, M., Tuyls, K., Parkes, D. C., & Summerfield, C. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2319949121 · Cited by 13
Sensibilités performatives. Les nouvelles sensibilités des objets dans les métropoles contemporaines
Lemos, A. (2016) · Sociétés · doi:10.3917/soc.132.0075 · Cited by 7
Díaz, D., & Boj, C. (2023) · Artnodes · doi:10.7238/artnodes.v0i31.405249 · Cited by 7
Wendt, T. G., & Manhart, S. (2023) · Organisation und Pädagogik · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-42315-5_11 · Cited by 7
An evaluative conservative case for biomedical enhancement
Danaher, J. (2016) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103307 · Cited by 7
Self-citationThere is plenty of time at the bottom: the economics, risk and ethics of time compression
Sandberg, A. (2018) · foresight · doi:10.1108/fs-04-2018-0044 · Cited by 8
Social Justice and Artificial Intelligence by Dr. Adnan Hadzi (University of Malta)
Hadziselimovic, A. (2019) · Body Space & Technology · doi:10.16995/bst.318 · Cited by 7
#BoycottBlizzard: Capitalismo de Plataforma e a Colonização do Jogo
Falcão, T. P., Marques, D., & Mussa, I. (2020) · Revista Contracampo · doi:10.22409/contracampo.v0i0.38578 · Cited by 8
Gerdes, A. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63128-4_19 · Cited by 7
Workplace health surveillance and COVID-19: algorithmic health discrimination and cancer survivors
Harpur, P. D., Hyseni, F., & Blanck, P. (2022) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-021-01144-1 · Cited by 7
Goodman, E. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3391388 · Cited by 8
Governing Transport in the Algorithmic Age
Forum, I. T. (2019) · International transport forum policy papers · doi:10.1787/eec0b9aa-en · Cited by 8
On the need for a global AI ethics
Lundgren, B., Catena, E., Robertson, I., Hellrigel-Holderbaum, M., Jaja, I. R., & Dung, L. (2024) · Journal of Global Ethics · doi:10.1080/17449626.2024.2425366 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Danaher, J.
- Affiliations
- Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Danaher, John
- ORCID
- Danaher, John
- Venue
- Philosophy & Technology
- Published
- 2016-01-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-268
- ISSN
- 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
- 2210-5441
- OpenAlex
- W2242985385
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 85 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 66.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- philarchive.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Keywords
- algocracy, algorithmic governance, algorithmic decision-making, political legitimacy, epistocracy, public decision-making, human participation, social decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
