The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Another point is that increased used of data, and the translation of all aspects of human action into data is that such quantification by necessity involves multiple stages of human interpretation, challenging the objective veneer of big data-based decision making [21,34,36].”
From A shallow defence of a technocracy of artificial intelligence: Examining the political harms of algorithmic governance in the domain of government (2020) · cites this paper as [36]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Whether we like it or not, algorithms are increasingly being used to nudge, bias, guide, provoke, control, manipulate and constrain human behaviour.”
From Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence (2017) · cites this paper as Danaher, 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In public-law terms, the concern is not only whether AI improves efficiency but also whether algorithmic assistance remains compatible with accountable justification, discretionary control, and rule-of-law legitimacy (Danaher, 2016;Binns, 2018;Busuioc, 2021).”
From From Human Oversight to Cognitive Sovereignty: A Process-Based Governance Standard for AI-Assisted Legal Reasoning (2026) · cites this paper as Danaher, 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In this sense, Cognitive Sovereignty responds to the threat of algocracy: the risk that governance becomes dependent on decision systems whose operation is not meaningfully contestable by the persons subject to them (Danaher, 2016).”
From From Human Oversight to Cognitive Sovereignty: A Process-Based Governance Standard for AI-Assisted Legal Reasoning (2026) · cites this paper as Danaher, 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This may lead to ‘algocracy’, in which ‘the legitimacy of public decision-making processes’ is thwarted by ‘the opacity of certain algocratic governance systems’ (Danaher, 2016).”
From Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason (2018) · cites this paper as Danaher, 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“were similar to concepts used in the pre-existing literature on the problems of algorithmic governance (e.g. Danaher, 2016; Zarsky, 2016)”
From Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence (2017) · cites this paper as Danaher, 2016
In the citing paper
“For example, as mentioned in [28], 'the human may want to guard against certain kinds of discrimination, and their notion of fairness may be too abstract to be completely encoded into the system'”
From Beyond explainability: justifiability and contestability of algorithmic decision systems (2022) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polanyi, M. (1997) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-x · Cited by 12,410
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7 · Cited by 6,333 · cited 1×
“Within the philosophy of mind, there is a school of thought that endorses the ‘extended mind thesis’ (Clark & Chalmers 1998; Clark 2010).”
BackgroundThe second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.184834 · Cited by 4,409
Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-6804 · Cited by 3,657
(1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,259
Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence.
Meehl, P. E. (1954) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/11281-000 · Cited by 2,227
Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-0788 · Cited by 2,205
Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension
Clark, A. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001 · Cited by 2,201
Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies
Bostrom, N. (2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.187536 · Cited by 1,998
The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies
Dong, X., & McIntyre, S. H. (2014) · Quantitative Finance · doi:10.1080/14697688.2014.946440 · Cited by 1,759
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Clark, A. (2010). Supersizing the mind. Oxford: OUP.
- Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2014). Big data and due process: towards a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. Boston College Law Review, 55, 93.
- Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse ethics: notes on a program of philosophical justification. In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Trans. Christian Lenhart and Shierry Weber Nicholson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Pentland, A. (2014). Social Physics. London: Penguin Press
- Seaver, N. (2013). Knowing algorithms. In Media in Transition 8, Cambridge MA
- Zarsky, T. (2013). Transparent prediction. University of Illinois Law Review, 4, 1504.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732
Automation, Algorithms, and Beyond: Why Work Design Matters More Than Ever in a Digital World
Parker, S. K., & Grote, G. (2022) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12241 · Cited by 960
A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making
Burton, J. W., Stein, M., & Jensen, T. B. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2155 · Cited by 814
Transparency and the black box problem: why we do not trust AI
von Eschenbach, W. J. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0 · Cited by 786
Veale, M., & Binns, R. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717743530 · Cited by 512
Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason
Binns, R. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5 · Cited by 457
“This may lead to ‘algocracy’, in which ‘the legitimacy of public decision-making processes’ is thwarted by ‘the opacity of certain algocratic governance systems’ (Danaher, 2016).”
BackgroundNewlands, G. (2021) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840620937900 · Cited by 439
Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence
Danaher, J., Hogan, M. J., Noone, C., Kennedy, R., Behan, A., De Paor, A., Felzmann, H., Haklay, M., Khoo, S.-M., Morison, J., et al. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717726554 · Cited by 369
“Sometimes this is beneficial; sometimes benign; sometimes problematic (Danaher, 2016; Pasquale, 2015; Zarsky, 2016).”
InfluentialSelf-citationvan Noordt, C., & Misuraca, G. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101714 · Cited by 356
Wieringa, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372833 · Cited by 321
Ahmad, K., Maabreh, M., Ghaly, M., Khan, K., Qadir, J., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2022) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100452 · Cited by 291
Bucher, E. L., Schou, P. K., & Waldkirch, M. (2021) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508420961531 · Cited by 349
Machinic dispossession and augmented despotism: Digital work in an Amazon warehouse
Delfanti, A. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819891613 · Cited by 229
Lee, M. K., Kusbit, D., Kahng, A., Kim, J. T., Yuan, X., Chan, A., See, D., Noothigattu, R., Lee, S., Psomas, A., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359283 · Cited by 260
There Is No Techno-Responsibility Gap
Tigard, D. W. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00414-7 · Cited by 198
Dissecting the Algorithmic Leviathan: On the Socio-Political Anatomy of Algorithmic Governance
König, P. D. (2019) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00363-w · Cited by 191
The impact of using algorithms for managerial decisions on public employees' procedural justice
Nagtegaal, R. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101536 · Cited by 166
Lanzing, M. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0316-4 · Cited by 184
Lee, M. K., & Rich, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445570 · Cited by 145
Artificial intelligence, bureaucratic form, and discretion in public service
Bullock, J., Young, M. M., & Wang, Y.-F. (2020) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-200223 · Cited by 139
Humanly Extended Automation or the Future of Work Seen through Amazon Patents
Delfanti, A., & Frey, B. (2020) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243920943665 · Cited by 139
Algorithmic Governance and the International Politics of Big Tech
Srivastava, S. (2021) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592721003145 · Cited by 157
Danaher, J. (2016) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9770-5 · Cited by 125
Self-citationDemocracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence
Coeckelbergh, M. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4 · Cited by 115
Automatisierung, Algorithmen, Accountability
Saurwein, F. (2018) · Ethik in mediatisierten Welten · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-21083-0_3 · Cited by 112
Aradau, C., & Blanke, T. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192859624.001.0001 · Cited by 124
Sætra, H. S. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101283 · Cited by 111
Bibri, S. E., Huang, J., & Krogstie, J. (2024) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105516 · Cited by 135
The use of AI in public services: results from a preliminary mapping across the EU
Misuraca, G., van Noordt, C., & Boukli, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance · doi:10.1145/3428502.3428513 · Cited by 108
The computational therapeutic: exploring Weizenbaum’s ELIZA as a history of the present
Bassett, C. (2018) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-018-0825-9 · Cited by 114
Zum Verhältnis von Digitalisierung und Organisation
Büchner, S. (2018) · Zeitschrift für Soziologie · doi:10.1515/zfsoz-2018-0121 · Cited by 125
A principlist framework for cybersecurity ethics
Formosa, P., Wilson, M., & Richards, D. (2021) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2021.102382 · Cited by 105
Toward a political economy of nudge: smart city variations
Gandy, O. H., & Nemorin, S. (2018) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2018.1477969 · Cited by 105
Toward an Ethics of AI Assistants: an Initial Framework
Danaher, J. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0317-3 · Cited by 95
Self-citationThe loopholes of algorithmic public services: an “intelligent” accountability research agenda
Bracci, E. (2023) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-06-2022-5856 · Cited by 89
Ethical Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles: The AV Ethics Project
Evans, K., de Moura, N., Chauvier, S., Chatila, R., & Dogan, E. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00272-8 · Cited by 82
Sharing what? The ‘sharing economy’ in the sociological debate
Arcidiacono, D. L., Gandini, A., & Pais, I. (2018) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0038026118758529 · Cited by 94
Peeters, R. (2020) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-200253 · Cited by 78
Transparency and accountability in digital public services: Learning from the Brazilian cases
Saldanha, D. M. F., Dias, C. N., & Guillaumon, S. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101680 · Cited by 108
Gamez, P., Shank, D. B., Arnold, C., & North, M. (2020) · Ai & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-00977-1 · Cited by 68
‘Human oversight’ in the EU artificial intelligence act: what, when and by whom?
Enqvist, L. (2023) · Law, Innovation and Technology · doi:10.1080/17579961.2023.2245683 · Cited by 142
Beyond explainability: justifiability and contestability of algorithmic decision systems
Henin, C., & Le Métayer, D. (2022) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01251-8 · Cited by 71
Cyber Elections in the Digital Age: Threats and Opportunities of Technology for Electoral Integrity
Garnett, H. A., & James, T. S. (2020) · Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy · doi:10.1089/elj.2020.0633 · Cited by 67
Of ‘black boxes’ and algorithmic decision-making in (higher) education – A commentary
Prinsloo, P. (2020) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951720933994 · Cited by 67
The Illusion of Control: Placebo Effects of Control Settings
Vaccaro, K., Huang, D., Eslami, M., Sandvig, C., Hamilton, K., & Karahalios, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173590 · Cited by 65
Prinsloo, P. (2017) · E-Learning and Digital Media · doi:10.1177/2042753017731355 · Cited by 81
How Managers Maintain Control Through Collaborative Repair: Evidence from Platform-Mediated “Gigs”
Rahman, H. A., & Valentine, M. (2021) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1428 · Cited by 66
A smart place to work? Big data systems, labour, control and modern retail stores
Evans, L., & Kitchin, R. (2018) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12107 · Cited by 61
Veale, M., & Binns, R. (2017) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/ustxg · Cited by 512
van Noordt, C., Medaglia, R., & Tangi, L. (2023) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/09520767231198411 · Cited by 84
Artificial Intelligence and the Political Legitimacy of Global Governance
Erman, E., & Furendal, M. (2022) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00323217221126665 · Cited by 59
Bujold, A., Parent‐Rocheleau, X., & Gaudet, M. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100245 · Cited by 76
Hardy, C., Bhakoo, V., & Maguire, S. (2020) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12222 · Cited by 49
Artificial Moral Responsibility: How We Can and Cannot Hold Machines Responsible
Tigard, D. W. (2021) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180120000985 · Cited by 63
The politics of AI: democracy and authoritarianism in developing countries
Filgueiras, F. D. B. (2022) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2021.2016543 · Cited by 66
Bibri, S. E. (2023) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities6030065 · Cited by 62
Algorithms and values in justice and security
Hayes, P., van de Poel, I., & Steen, M. (2020) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-019-00932-9 · Cited by 62
The Parasitic Nature of Social AI: Sharing Minds with the Mindless
Sætra, H. S. (2020) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-020-09523-6 · Cited by 59
Lemos, A. (2021) · Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais · doi:10.15448/1984-7289.2021.2.39638 · Cited by 113
Managing workplace AI risks and the future of work
Howard, J., & Schulte, P. A. (2024) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajim.23653 · Cited by 59
Growth, degrowth, and the challenge of artificial superintelligence
Pueyo, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.138 · Cited by 49
Regulating Recommending: Motivations, Considerations, and PrinciplesPreprint
Cobbe, J., & Singh, J. P. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3371830 · Cited by 47
Suspect AI: Vibraimage, Emotion Recognition Technology and Algorithmic Opacity
Wright, J. D. (2021) · Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1177/09717218211003411 · Cited by 59
What is algorithmic governance?
Issar, S., & Aneesh, A. (2021) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12955 · Cited by 59
Rubel, A., Castro, C., & Pham, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895057 · Cited by 47
Border security and the digitalisation of sovereignty: insights from EU borderwork
Martins, B. O., Lidén, K., & Jumbert, M. G. (2022) · European Security · doi:10.1080/09662839.2022.2101884 · Cited by 44
Uber and the making of an Algopticon - Insights from the daily life of Montreal drivers
Jamil, R. (2020) · Capital & Class · doi:10.1177/0309816820904031 · Cited by 43
Is explainable artificial intelligence intrinsically valuable?
Colaner, N. R. (2021) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01184-2 · Cited by 43
The senatorial governance of Bitcoin: making (de)centralized money
Parkin, J. (2019) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147.2019.1678262 · Cited by 43
Discovering the Sweet Spot of Human-Computer Configurations
Mackeprang, M., Müller-Birn, C., & Stauss, M. T. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359297 · Cited by 41
A guideline for understanding and measuring algorithmic governance in everyday life
Latzer, M., & Festic, N. (2019) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2019.2.1415 · Cited by 51
Liu, H.-Y., & Maas, M. M. (2021) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2020.102672 · Cited by 43
van Kersbergen, K., & Vis, B. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101707 · Cited by 45
Scaffolding Human Champions: AI as a More Competent Other
Sætra, H. S. (2022) · Human Arenas · doi:10.1007/s42087-022-00304-8 · Cited by 51
Algorithmic Transparency: Concepts, Antecedents, and Consequences – A Review and Research Framework
Dresden, T. U., Bitzer, T., Wiener, M. J., Dresden, T. U., & Cram, W. A. (2023) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.05214 · Cited by 43
The role of explainability in AI-supported medical decision-making
Gerdes, A. (2024) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-024-00119-2 · Cited by 34
Subjetividades e inteligencia artificial: desafíos para ‘lo humano’
Tao, H. B., Pérez, V. R. D., & Guerra, Y. (2020) · Veritas · doi:10.4067/s0718-92732020000300081 · Cited by 64
Gallagher, P., & Griffin, R. (2023) · Social Policy and Society · doi:10.1017/s1474746423000428 · Cited by 34
A social cartography of analytics in education as performative politics
Prinsloo, P. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12872 · Cited by 35
Drone Use for COVID‐19 Related Problems: Techno‐solutionism and its Societal Implications
Martins, B. O., Lavallée, C., & Silkoset, A. (2021) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13007 · Cited by 32
Deng, C., Li, H., Wang, Y., & Zhu, R. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114738 · Cited by 40
Büchner, S., & Dosdall, H. (2021) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-021-00752-0 · Cited by 36
Algorithms as figures: Towards a post-digital ethnography of algorithmic contexts
Cellard, L. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221079032 · Cited by 35
The trustification of AI. Disclosing the bridging pillars that tie trust and AI together
Bareis, J. (2024) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517241249430 · Cited by 32
Filgueiras, F. D. B. (2021) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01201-4 · Cited by 35
Technology in the Workplace: Opportunities and Challenges
Griep, Y., Vranješ, I., van Hooff, M. L. M., Beckers, D. G. J., & Geurts, S. A. E. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74128-0_6 · Cited by 42
Transparency as Manipulation? Uncovering the Disciplinary Power of Algorithmic Transparency
Wang, H. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00564-w · Cited by 33
Tironi, M., & Lisboa, D. I. R. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102264 · Cited by 41
Scherer, A. G., & Neesham, C. (2023) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877231204083 · Cited by 30
The old in the new: Voter surveillance in political clientelism and datafied campaigning
Kusche, I. (2020) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951720908290 · Cited by 34
McKinney, S. (2024) · Journal of Deliberative Democracy · doi:10.16997/jdd.1556 · Cited by 45
Sullivan, R., Veen, A., & Riemer, K. (2024) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100528 · Cited by 34
Algorithms and Public Service Media
Sørensen, J. K., & Hutchinson, J. P. (2018) · VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) · Cited by 27
Master and Slave: the Dialectic of Human-Artificial Intelligence Engagement
Kim, T. W., Maimone, F., Pattit, K., Sisón, A. J. G., & Teehankee, B. L. (2021) · Humanistic Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s41463-021-00118-w · Cited by 27
Reflection Machines: Supporting Effective Human Oversight Over Medical Decision Support Systems
Haselager, P., Schraffenberger, H., Thill, S., Fischer, S. W. S., Lanillos, P., van de Groes, S., & van Hooff, M. L. (2023) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180122000718 · Cited by 27
A Critique of Linguistic Capitalism: Provocation/Intervention
Thornton, P. (2018) · GeoHumanities · doi:10.1080/2373566x.2018.1486724 · Cited by 27
Pedersen, T., & Johansen, C. (2019) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-019-00928-5 · Cited by 28
Mendonça, R. F., Almeida, V. A. F., & Filgueiras, F. D. B. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192870070.001.0001 · Cited by 28
Aloisi, A. (2024) · International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations · doi:10.54648/ijcl2024001 · Cited by 25
AI Ethics: A Bibliometric Analysis, Critical Issues, and Key Gaps
Gao, D., Haverly, A., Mittal, S., Wu, J., & Chen, J.-D. (2024) · International Journal of Business Analytics · doi:10.4018/ijban.338367 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Danaher, J.
- Affiliations
- Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Danaher, John
- ORCID
- Danaher, John
- Venue
- Philosophy & Technology
- Published
- 2016-01-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-268
- ISSN
- 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
- 2210-5441
- OpenAlex
- W2242985385
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 85 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 66.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- philarchive.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Keywords
- algocracy, algorithmic governance, algorithmic decision-making, political legitimacy, epistocracy, public decision-making, human participation, social decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
