The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Centered Decision-Making
Open accessAbstract
Advanced AI systems are rapidly making their way into medical research and practice, and, arguably, it is only a matter of time before they will surpass human practitioners in terms of accuracy, reliability, and knowledge. If this is true, practitioners will have a prima facie epistemic and professional obligation to align their medical verdicts with those of advanced AI systems. However, in light of their complexity, these AI systems will often function as black boxes: the details of their contents, calculations, and procedures cannot be meaningfully understood by human practitioners. When AI systems reach this level of complexity, we can also speak of black-box medicine. In this paper, we want to argue that black-box medicine conflicts with core ideals of patient-centered medicine. In particular, we claim, black-box medicine is not conducive for supporting informed decision-making based on shared information, shared deliberation, and shared mind between practitioner and patient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“studies show that many AI systems used in medicine are highly reliable, and sometimes have greater precision than human doctors.”
From The Epistemic Cost of Opacity: How the Use of Artificial Intelligence Undermines the Knowledge of Medical Doctors in High-Stakes Contexts (2025) · cites this paper as Bjerring and Busch (2021, 350)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For specific medical treatments, the studies establishing their effec -tiveness are available in journals, or online. So, as Bjerring and Busch ( 2021 , 364) point out, there is indeed some information made available that can be used by medi -cal doctors to justify their belief that a certain treatment is effective.”
From The Epistemic Cost of Opacity: How the Use of Artificial Intelligence Undermines the Knowledge of Medical Doctors in High-Stakes Contexts (2025) · cites this paper as Bjerring and Busch, 2021
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, AI can help patients with diabetes to manage their blood glucose levels, diet, and exercise using a chatbot that provides education and coaching based on natural language processing and machine learning. 66”
From Artificial Intelligence and Decision-Making in Healthcare: A Thematic Analysis of a Systematic Review of Reviews (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Since clinicians are no longer able to fully comprehend the inner workings and calculations of the decision aid they are not able to explain to the patient how certain outcomes or recommendations were derived [33].”
From Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“Seeking to address these questions, it was recently argued that so-called ‘black-box medicine’ conflicts with core ideals of patient-centered medicine [33].”
From Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
Topol, E. J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 · Cited by 10,450
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 · Cited by 9,955
Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM
Sackett, D. L. (2000) · Cited by 5,950
Actual causes of death in the United States
McGinnis, J. M. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510180077038 · Cited by 5,480
A guide to deep learning in healthcare
Esteva, A., Robicquet, A., Ramsundar, B., Kuleshov, V., DePristo, M., Chou, K., Cui, C., Corrado, G., Thrun, S., & Dean, J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z · Cited by 5,312
Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences
Miller, T. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007 · Cited by 5,302
Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future
Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Dong, Q., Shen, H., & Wang, Y. (2017) · Stroke and Vascular Neurology · doi:10.1136/svn-2017-000101 · Cited by 4,837
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., et al. (2018) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 · Cited by 4,774
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Faes, L., Liu, X., Kale, A., Bruynseels, A., Shamdas, M., Moraes, G., Fu, D.J., Wagner, S.K., Kern, C., Ledsam, J.R. and Schmid, M.K. (2019). Deep learning under scrutiny: performance against health care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging-systematic review and meta-Analysis (preprint). · DOI · Paper page
- Price II, W. N. (2017). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: applications and legal implications. The SciTech Lawyer, 14(1), 10–13.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–271 of 271
Attitudes Towards Non-directiveness Among Medical Geneticists in Germany and Switzerland
Eichinger, J., Elger, B. S., McLennan, S., Filges, I., & Koné, I. (2024) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-024-10355-x · Cited by 1
“In such instances, the person-centred decision-making (PCDM) approach is appro-priate—just as it is widely acknowledged in all other fields of medicine that healthcare has to be person-centred (Elwyn, Gray, and Clarke 2000; Bjerring and Busch 2021; Debrabander 2022).”
Transforming Healthcare With Patient-Centric and AI-Powered Personalized Medicine
Moumtzoglou, A. S. (2024) · Advances in healthcare information systems and administration book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3260-3.ch017 · Cited by 1
Artificial intelligence and surgical radiology – how it is shaping real‐world management
Chai, V., Wirth, L. J., Cao, K., Lim, L., & Yeung, J. M. C. (2024) · ANZ Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1111/ans.19256 · Cited by 1
Qutishat, M. (2025) · Nursing in Critical Care · doi:10.1111/nicc.13272 · Cited by 1
“23,24 Additionally, witnessing a loved one in a vulnerable state while relying solely on screens can heighten anxiety and helplessness.”
Olorunfemi, O., Ayodele, O. H., & Osunde, R. N. (2025) · D Y Patil Journal of Health Sciences · doi:10.4103/dypj.dypj_49_24 · Cited by 2
Schlögl-Flierl, K., & Ziethmann, P. (2025) · Magdeburger Forschungen zu Bildungs-, Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-46631-2_3 · Cited by 2
TURHAN, E. N. (2022) · Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.52273/sduhfd..1227517 · Cited by 1
Deep learning-based algorithm for predicting the live birth potential of mouse embryosPreprint
Tokuoka, Y., Yamada, T., Mashiko, D., Ikeda, Z., Kobayashi, T. J., Yamagata, K., & Funahashi, A. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.19.456065 · Cited by 1
“Low explainability of the predictions made by machine learning algorithms not only makes it difficult to assess the reliability of these predictions in clinical practice but is also a lost opportunity for physician decision-making and patient-centred care [20].”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Garard, J., Ezirigwe, J., & Ayoub, M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-76750-0_72 · Cited by 1
Spencer, E.-J., Ihaddouchen, I., Buijsman, S., Jung, J., van der Vorst, J. P., Grünhagen, D. J., Verhoef, K., Gommers, D., van Genderen, M. E., & Hilling, D. E. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.03.16.26348461 · Cited by 1
McNulty, S. M., Cole, Y., Powell, B. C., & Rentas, S. (2021) · Advances in Molecular Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.yamp.2021.07.001
Oversight of artificial intelligence in medicine: A review of frameworks (Preprint)Preprint
Norah, M. H. S., Elsaid, M. I., Paskett, J., Bose‐Brill, S., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.36823
Artificial Intelligence for Opportunistic Chest CT Screening and Prognostication
Sourlos, N., van Ooijen, P. M. A., & Vliegenthart, R. (2022) · Contemporary medical imaging · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92087-6_45
Einleitung: Medizin – Technik – Ethik. Spannungsfelder zwischen Theorie und Praxis
Loh, J., & Grote, T. (2023) · Techno:Phil · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-65868-0_1
An Overview of the Most Recent Advances in Healthcare
Christogianni, A. (2023) · Advances in healthcare information systems and administration book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-5422-0.ch011
Toward adoption of health risk assessment in population-based and clinical scenariosPreprint
González, R., Monterde, D., Papa, R., Kull, M. M., Anier, A., Balducci, F., Cano, I., Coca, M., Marco, M. D., Franceschini, G., et al. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.08.02.23292593
Regulation of AI in healthcare
Gavaghan, C. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95068-8.00008-x
Evidence-Based Medicine in Theory and Practice: Epistemological and Normative Issues
Rogers, W., & Hutchison, K. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_40-2
Sonar, A., & Herzog, C. (2024) · Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie · doi:10.22613/zfpp/11.1.16
Kempt, H. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-68098-4_5
Kempt, H. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-68098-4_4
The GP’s guide to Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medicine
Outhoff, K., & Trathen, K. (2024) · South African General Practitioner · doi:10.36303/sagp.0954
Being Pragmatic About Reliance and Trust in Artificial IntelligencePreprint
Ferrario, A. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5148249
Foster, E. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198945215.003.0053
Herrick, G., Grand, Z., Frasier, K. M., Mazzoranna, A., Kioutchoukova, I. P., Foster, D. T., Ciesla, C. D., Rockwell, M., & Lowe, E. (2025) · Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1177/12034754251349193
“30 Establishing clear guidelines that define AI’s supportive role is essential to ensure it complements the surgeon’s expertise without replacing clinical judgment.”
Bager, P., & Bager, L. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87503-8_50
Societal, Legal, and Ethical Aspects of Trustworthy AI
Abadía, M. C., Goisauf, M., Hesso, I., Kayyali, R., Kogut-Czarkowska, M., Martínez, R. M., & Jiménez, P. N. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-89963-8_1 · Cited by 1
An Algorithm in Doctor’s Clothing: Anchoring Trust Appropriately in AI Healthcare Deployment
LaRosa, E. (2025) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-92958-8_9
Martens, R., Holodinsky, J. K., Simon, J. E., & Marshall, Z. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.80325
Patient Asks to AI: Is there Anybody there? Patient-Centered AI Approach and Human Oversight
Yilmaz, S. S. (2025) · International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics · doi:10.1109/mipro65660.2025.11131770
“[ 11] Data subject made by the AI system about the data subject, and the system’s correlational confusion undermines the AI’s criterion of transparency.”
InfluentialEthical Issues in the Use of Generative AI Chatbots for Therapeutic Purposes
Gerdes, A. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01429-0_30
Medical Artificial Intelligence
Grote, T. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197625835.013.0033
Evidence-Based Medicine in Theory and Practice: Epistemological and Normative Issues
Rogers, W., & Hutchison, K. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-2252-8_40
Healthcare and biopharmaceutical value chains
Williams, D. R. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820597-6.00011-0
Consent and Autonomy in the Age of Predictive Neuroscience
Rudroff, T. (2025) · Neurocultural health and wellbeing · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-11596-6_6 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence and Understanding in Medicine
Adams, J. (2025) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/bioe.70049
Dwivedi, A., Yusufi, R., Derashri, A., Sharma, D., Vinchurkar, K., Patel, D., & Suryawanshi, M. V. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-43823-3.00012-1
Maris, M. T., Koçar, A., Willems, D. L., Pols, J. J., Tan, H. L., Lindinger, G. L., & Bak, M. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26702278
Maris, M. T., Koçar, A., Willems, D. L., Pols, J. J., Tan, H. L., Lindinger, G. L., & Bak, M. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25547136
Maris, M. T., Koçar, A., Willems, D. L., Pols, J. J., Tan, H. L., Lindinger, G. L., & Bak, M. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25547013
Maris, M. T., Koçar, A., Willems, D. L., Pols, J. J., Tan, H. L., Lindinger, G. L., & Bak, M. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26702275
Witkowski, K. G. K., Okhai, R., & Neely, S. R. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26737857
Artificial Intelligence and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Garard, J., Ezirigwe, J., & Ayoub, M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32257-0_72-1
Martens, R., Holodinsky, J. K., Simon, J. E., & Marshall, Z. (2026) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/80325
“Opacity and low digital literacy are barriers to patient-centered care in this context, as any AIPM providing prognostic information to a clinician can influence care [6,38].”
Hirosawa, T., Yokose, M., Sakamoto, T., Hayashi, A., Harada, Y., Tokumasu, K., Mizuta, K., & Shimizu, T. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.92016
Decision Ownership and Deference to Healthcare AI
Slome, E. (2026) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-025-10518-4 · Cited by 1
“A related concern centres on the conflict between the “black-box” nature of AI and the core ideals of patient-centred medicine (Bjerring and Busch 2021).”
Yapay Zeka, Büyük Veri Ve Tıpta Bilimsel Araştırmalar
Hayran, O. (2026) · Eskişehir Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Halk Sağlığı Dergisi · doi:10.35232/estudamhsd.1872416
Expertise, opacity, and trust in AI systems
Boisseau, É. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05484-2
“…of the cases most frequently discussed in the literature) in the context of medical diagnosis and imaging (Lee et al., 2017; Grote & Berens, 2020; Bjerring & Busch, 2020), policing – within what is sometimes referred to as ‘predictive policing’ – (Asaro, 2019; Walsh, 2022 ), banking, finance and…”
Sharma, V., Chawla, G. K., Kukreti, S., Ahuja, K., & Singh, S. (2026) · Exploration of Medicine · doi:10.37349/emed.2026.1001383 · Cited by 3
Artificial intelligence and radiology integration in neuromodulation and deep brain stimulation
Vahedifard, F., Marathu, K. K., Diler, R. S., & Vattoth, S. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-26466-5.00013-1
Toward Relationship-Centered Care with AI: Designing for Human Connections in Healthcare
Seo, W., Melnick, E. R., Jung, H., Sefidgar, Y. S., Sakumoto, M., Schwaninger, I., Krug, S., Berry, A. B. L., & Hose, B. (2026) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3772363.3778753
“Even as AI systems are designed to support clinicians and empower patients, their opaque or “black-box” nature creates tensions with principles of patient-centered and relationship-centered care [1, 3].”
Kim, Y., Kim, M., Kim, S., Cho, S., & Kim, J. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790971
“Many patients lack specialized clinical knowledge, making the raw technical outputs from AI systems difficult to interpret and potentially leading to misunderstandings [5, 28, 74].”
Márquez, F. O. S., & Ortiz, G. E. R. (2026) · Advances in Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1155/ahci/8435912
Wrona, J., Tryczyński, P., Sałak, J., Helbin, P., Gralec, A., Ożga, S., Donocik, W., & Spirkowicz, A. (2026) · International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science · doi:10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.5681
Drogt, J., Jongsma, K. R., & Milota, M. (2026) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10073-3_6
Real-world readiness of explainable AI in clinical decision support: a systematic reviewPreprint
Milbeck, S., Pervan, M., Corriveau, B., Hama, L., Kringos, D. S., & Groene, O. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10052279/v1
Ghaffar, R., Rajab, S., Ghafar, M., Ghafar, S., Hussain, M., Sattar, A., Uwais, M., Rafiq, A., & Aziz, R. Y. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-44021-2.00015-4
Uncanny Human Kinds: the Problematic Social Life of Deep Learning-Generated Health Categories
Postan, E. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01125-1
“…be involved in domain experts’ explanations of how high Body Mass Index is connected to the comorbidities associated with obesity, or of the role of particular gene variants in cancer risk, these do not approach the profound and obstinate black box problem of DL systems (Bjerring & Busch, 2021 ).”
Clinician Perceptions of AI in Care: Cross-Sectional Survey
Stephenson, C., Eadie, J., Omrani, M., & Alavi, N. (2026) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/95296
Katipoğlu, B., & Karaman, F. (2026) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2026.106381
Burzler, M. A., Grund, S., & Tran, U. S. (2026) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-026-02946-z
Patients’ Perception and Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence: A Cross-Sectional Study
Rabie, F. M., Mamdouh, Y., Alabadd, R. A., Abuihlayel, M. O., Marzouk, M. M., Al-Rawashdeh, I., & Abdelmoneam, A. H. (2026) · PAIN JOINTS SPINE · doi:10.1922/pjs.16.7s.2026.1091
Artificial Intelligence in the Medical Diagnostic Process: Issues of Responsibility and Care Ethics
Brandt, W., Fritz, A., & Kießig, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-23721-7_8
EEG Biomarkers as Indices of Functional Brain Systems in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Berger, C., Höhne, E., Reis, O., Kölch, M. G., & Brehme, H. (2026) · Diagnostica · doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000369
Dai, D., Pakianathan, P. V. S., Treff, G., Sareban, M., Niebauer, J., Smeddinck, J. D., & Kuoppamäki, S. (2026) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3820253.3820281
“While proposed strategies include keeping clinicians in the loop [5, 87], grounding outputs in structured health data [11, 37], and integrating retrieval-based evidence sources [55], they aim to preserve patient agency while reducing risks associated with the limitations of AI interpreting clinical…”
From Informed Consent to Informed Dependence: Rethinking Autonomy in AI-Mediated Clinical Care
Lahtinen, M., Salo, E., & Virtanen, J. (2026) · Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine · doi:10.51847/9ylvg44hby
Muller, O., Pałubska, J., Rafałowska, Z., Rutz, S., Wojtala, A., Kret, J., Wyrostkiewicz, A., Sadkowski, A., Bigda, P., Gdula, J., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science · doi:10.31435/ijitss.3(51).2026.6008
When prediction becomes prescription
Waitzman, R. (2026) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-026-10399-3
Boretti, A. A. (2026) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.70661
Transparency fallacy: insights from healthcare professionals on the safe use of medical AI
Aranovich, T. D. C., Matulionytė, R., & Magrabi, F. (2026) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2026.106413
Madabushi, V. V., Yadav, G. K., Bhardwaj, R. R., Fatima, T., & Tirkey, S. P. (2026) · International Conference on Educational Technology, Language and Technical Communication (ETLTC) · doi:10.3390/engproc2026143079
Metadata
- Authors
- Bjerring, J. C., & Busch, J.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Bjerring, Jens Christian
- Busch, Jacob
- Venue
- Philosophy & Technology
- Published
- 2020-01-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 349-371
- ISSN
- 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
- 2210-5441
- OpenAlex
- W2999885075
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 7.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.au.dk
- Licence
- Locations
- Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in healthcare, patient-centered medicine, shared decision-making, informed consent, clinical judgment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
