Cited by 72Paleopathology and ancient diseasesForensic and Genetic ResearchAncient Egypt and Archaeology

First insights into the metagenome of Egyptian mummies using next-generation sequencing

Khairat, Rabab, Ball, Markus, Chang, Chun-Chi Hsieh, Bianucci, Raffaella, Nerlich, Andreas G., Trautmann, Martin, Ismail, Somaia, Shanab, Gamila M. L. +3 more·2013·Journal of Applied Genetics

Abstract

We applied, for the first time, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology on Egyptian mummies. Seven NGS datasets obtained from five randomly selected Third Intermediate to Graeco-Roman Egyptian mummies (806 BC-124AD) and two unearthed pre-contact Bolivian lowland skeletons were generated and characterised. The datasets were contrasted to three recently published NGS datasets obtained from cold-climate regions, i.e. the Saqqaq, the Denisova hominid and the Alpine Iceman. Analysis was done using one million reads of each newly generated or published dataset. Blastn and megablast results were analysed using MEGAN software. Distinct NGS results were replicated by specific and sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols in ancient DNA dedicated laboratories. Here, we provide unambiguous identification of authentic DNA in Egyptian mummies. The NGS datasets showed variable contents of endogenous DNA harboured in tissues. Three of five mummies displayed a human DNA proportion comparable to the human read count of the Saqqaq permafrost-preserved specimen. Furthermore, a metagenomic signature unique to mummies was displayed. By applying a "bacterial fingerprint", discrimination among mummies and other remains from warm areas outside Egypt was possible. Due to the absence of an adequate environment monitoring, a bacterial bloom was identified when analysing different biopsies from the same mummies taken after a lapse of time of 1.5 years. Plant kingdom representation in all m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13353-013-0145-1

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khairat, R., Ball, M., Chang, C.-C. H., Bianucci, R., Nerlich, A. G., Trautmann, M., Ismail, S., Shanab, G. M. L., Karim, A. M., Gad, Y. Z., & Pusch, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Egyptian Museum (EG)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Ain Shams University (EG)
Corresponding author
Pusch, Carsten M.
Venue
Journal of Applied Genetics
Published
2013-04-04
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
309-325
ISSN
  • 1234-1983 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-3883
OpenAlex
W2007436736
Cited by
72
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6
FWCI
63.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Paleopathology and ancient diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
Keywords
ancient mummies, ancient DNA, metagenomics, Egyptian mummies, endogenous DNA, Plasmodium falciparum, Toxoplasma gondii, malaria, toxoplasmosis
MeSH terms
Egypt, Ancient, Base Sequence, Biopsy, Embalming, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Mummies, Phylogeny, Plasmodium falciparum, Temperature, Toxoplasma, Gene Library, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, History, Ancient, Metagenome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review