The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in Occupational Segregation by Gender 1970–2009: Adjusting for the Impact of Changes in the Occupational Coding System
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we develop a gender-specific crosswalk based on dual-coded Current Population Survey data to bridge the change in the census occupational coding system that occurred in 2000 and use it to provide the first analysis of the trends in occupational segregation by sex for the 1970–2009 period based on a consistent set of occupational codes and data sources. We show that our gender-specific crosswalk more accurately captures the trends in occupational segregation that are masked using the aggregate crosswalk (based on combined male and female employment) provided by the U.S. Census Bureau. Using the 2000 occupational codes, we find that segregation by sex declined substantially over the period but at a diminished pace over the decades, falling by only 1.1 percentage points (on a decadal basis) in the 2000s. A primary mechanism by which segregation was reduced was through the entry of new cohorts of women, presumably better prepared than their predecessors and/or encountering less labor market discrimination; during the 1970s and 1980s, however, occupational segregation also decreased within cohorts. Reductions in segregation were correlated with education, with the largest decrease among college graduates and very little change in segregation among high school dropouts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled
England, P. (2010) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243210361475 · Cited by 1,687
The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap
Goldin, C., Katz, L. F., & Kuziemko, I. (2006) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.20.4.133 · Cited by 1,010
Cited by
The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20160995 · Cited by 2,999
Self-citationEagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000494 · Cited by 1,136
The Allocation of Talent and U.S. Economic Growth
Hsieh, C.-T., Hurst, E., Jones, C. I., & Klenow, P. J. (2019) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta11427 · Cited by 664
The gendered pandemic: The implications of COVID‐19 for work and family
Yavorsky, J. E., Qian, Y., & Sargent, A. C. (2021) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12881 · Cited by 283
The Application of Social Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics
Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12573 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Blau, F. D., Brummund, P., & Liu, A. Y.-H.
- Venue
- Demography
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2012-10-02
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 471-492
- ISSN
- 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7790
- OpenAlex
- W2890150220
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Occupational Segregation by Gender 1970–2009: Adjusting for the Impact of Changes in the Occupational Coding System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13524-012-0151-7
- The paper
- Blau, F. D., Brummund, P., & Liu, A. Y.-H. (2013). Trends in Occupational Segregation by Gender 1970–2009: Adjusting for the Impact of Changes in the Occupational Coding System. Demography. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0151-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.