Cited by 44Birth, Development, and HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareDisaster Management and Resilience

The Effect of Prenatal Natural Disaster Exposure on School Outcomes

Open access
Fuller, Sarah C.·2014·Demography

Abstract

This study looks at the impact of exposure to natural disasters during pregnancy on the educational outcomes of North Carolina children at the third grade level. A broad literature relates negative birth outcomes to poor educational performance, and a number of recent studies have examined the effect of prenatal exposure to natural disasters on birth outcomes. This study takes the next step by considering how prenatal exposure affects later outcomes. Combining North Carolina administrative data on births and school performance with disaster declarations from the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) allows for the identification of children who were exposed to disasters during prenatal development. These children are compared with other children born in the same county who were not exposed to disasters while in utero. Regression results suggest that children exposed to hurricanes prenatally have lower scores on third grade standardized tests in math and reading. Those exposed to flooding or tornadoes also have somewhat lower math scores. Additionally, results suggest that these negative effects are more concentrated among children in disadvantaged subgroups, especially children born to black mothers. However, no evidence exists that these effects are mediated by common measures of birth outcomes, including birth weight and gestational age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13524-014-0310-0

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children exposed to natural disasters like hurricanes, tornadoes, and flooding prenatally have lower scores on third grade standardized tests.

    “Children exposed to natural disasters like hurricanes, tornadoes, and flooding prenatally have lower scores on third grade standardized tests [103].”

    From Stress and the HPA Axis: Balancing Homeostasis and Fertility. (2017) · cites this paper as [103]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fuller, S. C.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Fuller, Sarah C.
Venue
Demography
Published
2014-06-06
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
1501-1525
ISSN
  • 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-7790
OpenAlex
W2038849989
Cited by
44
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Demography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
Keywords
hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, academic performance, birth outcomes, birth weight, gestational age, racial disparities, Black mothers, disadvantaged children, North Carolina
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Weight, Disasters, Educational Status, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Male, North Carolina, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Schools, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review