Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: Challenges and Perspectives

Open access
Liopyris, Konstantinos, Gregoriou, Stamatios, Dias, Julia, Stratigos, Alexandros J.·2022·Dermatology and Therapy

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) based on machine learning and convolutional neuron networks (CNN) is rapidly becoming a realistic prospect in dermatology. Non-melanoma skin cancer is the most common cancer worldwide and melanoma is one of the deadliest forms of cancer. Dermoscopy has improved physicians’ diagnostic accuracy for skin cancer recognition but unfortunately it remains comparatively low. AI could provide invaluable aid in the early evaluation and diagnosis of skin cancer. In the last decade, there has been a breakthrough in new research and publications in the field of AI. Studies have shown that CNN algorithms can classify skin lesions from dermoscopic images with superior or at least equivalent performance compared to clinicians. Even though AI algorithms have shown very promising results for the diagnosis of skin cancer in reader studies, their generalizability and applicability in everyday clinical practice remain elusive. Herein we attempted to summarize the potential pitfalls and challenges of AI that were underlined in reader studies and pinpoint strategies to overcome limitations in future studies. Finally, we tried to analyze the advantages and opportunities that lay ahead for a better future for dermatology and patients, with the potential use of AI in our practices. Artificial intelligence (AI) is the development of computer systems able to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, and translation between languages. The research on the use of AI in dermatology includes the ability of a machine to correctly classify a skin lesion. Skin cancer is the most common cancer worldwide and melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer. All skin cancers have a better prognosis when detected early in their development, hence their early detection is of paramount importance. Dermatologists use a dermatoscope—a specialized magnifying lens to improve their diagnostic capacity. However, even with the use of the dermatoscope, their ability to recognize skin cancer is far from perfect. AI has the ability to learn from dermoscopic images and subsequently provide an image-based diagnosis. Several studies compared the performance of machines and humans in classifying skin lesions from these images and showed that machines can classify skin lesions as good (and sometimes better) than humans. However, the application of AI in everyday clinical practice remains a challenge. In this article, we attempt to summarize the limitations and challenges that researchers found in their studies, and we provide strategies to improve the design of future studies. Finally, we describe the advantages and opportunities that could lay ahead for a better future for dermatology and patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13555-022-00833-8

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Liopyris, K., Gregoriou, S., Dias, J., & Stratigos, A. J.
Venue
Dermatology and Therapy
Published
2022-10-28
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
2637-2651
ISSN
  • 2190-9172 (ISSN-L)
  • 2193-8210
OpenAlex
W4307497971
Cited by
189
References
19
FWCI
13.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: Challenges and Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13555-022-00833-8
The paper
Liopyris, K., Gregoriou, S., Dias, J., & Stratigos, A. J. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: Challenges and Perspectives. Dermatology and Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00833-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.