Dermacen Analytica: A novel methodology integrating multi-modal large language models with machine learning in tele-dermatology
Open accessAbstract
The rise of Artificial Intelligence creates great promise in the field of medical discovery, diagnostics and patient management. However, the vast complexity of all medical domains require a more complex approach that combines machine learning algorithms, classifiers, segmentation algorithms and, lately, large language models. In this paper, we describe, implement and assess an Artificial Intelligence-empowered system and methodology aimed at assisting the diagnosis process of skin lesions and other skin conditions within the field of dermatology that aims to holistically address the diagnostic process in this domain. The workflow integrates large language, transformer-based vision models and sophisticated machine learning tools. This holistic approach achieves a nuanced interpretation of dermatological conditions that simulates and facilitates a dermatologist's workflow. We assess our proposed methodology through a thorough cross-model validation technique embedded in an evaluation pipeline that utilizes publicly available medical case studies of skin conditions and relevant images. To quantitatively score the system performance, advanced machine learning and natural language processing tools are employed which focus on similarity comparison and natural language inference. Additionally, we incorporate a human expert evaluation process based on a structured checklist to further validate our results. We implemented the proposed methodology in a system which achieved approximate (weighted) scores of 0.87 for both contextual understanding and diagnostic accuracy, demonstrating the efficacy of our approach in enhancing dermatological analysis. The proposed methodology is expected to prove useful in the development of next-generation tele-dermatology applications, enhancing remote consultation capabilities and access to care, especially in underserved areas.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Panagoulias et al.'s Dermacen Analytica achieved a mean score of 0.87 for context and diagnostic information.
“The system achieved a mean score of 0.87 for context and diagnostic information.”
From Revolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
The Evaluation Methodology section assesses context and diagnosis, supporting the claim that the system was scored on both. But the results passage (ABCDE Approximation; page unavailable) reports textual-similarity scores of 0.71 for context and 0.68 for diagnoses, not a mean score of 0.87; a search for 0.87 found no matching passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPanagoulias et al. presented Dermacen Analytica in teledermatology, which achieved diagnostic accuracy of 0.87 and context understanding, although it has not been tested on a small part of skin diseases.
“Panagoulias et al. (32) presented Dermacen Analytica in teledermatology, which achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 0.87 and context understanding, although it has not been tested on a small part of skin diseases.”
From Revolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
The Introduction presents Dermacen Analytica as a teledermatology workflow, and the evaluation passages report dermatological reasoning, diagnoses, and analysis of image-and-symptom context. However, our copy does not report diagnostic accuracy of 0.87; it gives textual-similarity scores of 0.71 for context and 0.68 for diagnoses. The Additional information section says the evaluation used 72 images, but does not establish the claimed limitation about a small part of skin diseases. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · cited 1× · see citing works
“ViTs are, in fact, a variation of the Transformer model (Vaswani et al., 2017; Devlin et al., 2018), which was originally developed for natural language processing (NLP) tasks.”
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · cited 1× · see citing works
“ViTs are, in fact, a variation of the Transformer model (Vaswani et al., 2017; Devlin et al., 2018), which was originally developed for natural language processing (NLP) tasks.”
BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation
Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., & Zhu, W.-J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '02 · doi:10.3115/1073083.1073135 · Cited by 21,344 · see citing works
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We use RoBERTa, a pre-trained model on English language text which uses masked language modeling (MLM) That is, it applies masking on a portion of the input tokens in a sentence and asks the model to predict the masked tokens (Liu et al., 2019).”
InfluentialSentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks
Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1410 · Cited by 12,778 · cited 8× · see citing works
“• Advanced Textual Similarity Models : Utilizing pre-trained models like BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) (Reimers & Gurevych, 2019), which can understand the context of words in text, one can compare the embeddings of the provided answer and the correct response.”
InfluentialHigh-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
Topol, E. J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 · Cited by 10,450 · see citing works
Transformers in Vision: A Survey
Khan, S., Naseer, M., Hayat, M., Zamir, S. W., Khan, F. S., & Shah, M. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3505244 · Cited by 3,595 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Vision Transformers (ViTs) (Zhai et al., 2022) constitute a type of AI model that has revolutionized the field of computer vision, i.e. the AI discipline focused on enabling machines to interpret and understand visual information from the world (Khan et al., 2022).”
A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inference
Williams, A., Nangia, N., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1101 · Cited by 3,342 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The roberta-large-mnli is a variant of the RoBERTa (Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach) model that has been specifically fine-tuned on the Multi-Genre Natural Language Inference (MNLI) dataset (Williams et al., 2018).”
Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence
Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., & King, D. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2 · Cited by 3,136 · see citing works
A survey of named entity recognition and classification
Nadeau, D., & Sekine, S. (2007) · Lingvisticae Investigationes · doi:10.1075/li.30.1.03nad · Cited by 2,507 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The primary goal of NER is to identify and categorize key information in text into predefined categories or “entities” such as the names of persons, organizations, locations, expressions of times, quantities, monetary values, percentages, etc. NER systems are designed to recognize entities within a body of text.”
Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNet
Yuan, L., Chen, Y., Wang, T., Yu, W., Shi, Y., Jiang, Z., Tay, F. E. H., Feng, J., & Yan, S. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00060 · Cited by 2,415 · cited 1× · see citing works
“During training (Atito et al., 2021), ViTs learn to identify features and patterns within the patches, leveraging the self-attention mechanism to understand the context and relationships between different parts of an image (Yuan et al., 2021; Zhai et al., 2022).”
Precision medicine, AI, and the future of personalized health care
Johnson, K. B., Wei, W., Weeraratne, D., Frisse, M. E., Misulis, K., Rhee, K., Zhao, J., & Snowdon, J. L. (2021) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12884 · Cited by 1,854 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Classifiers play a critical role in categorizing data, such as distinguishing between different types of tumors or identifying patients at high risk for certain conditions (Johnson et al., 2021).”
Hay, R. J., Johns, N. E., Williams, H. C., Bolliger, I. W., Dellavalle, R. P., Margolis, D. J., Marks, R., Naldi, L., Weinstock, M. A., Wulf, S. K., et al. (2014) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2013.446 · Cited by 1,706 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Dermatological conditions (Kerr et al., 2010; Hahnel et al., 2017; Hay et al., 2014) can be broadly categorized into several types, including, but not limited to: 1.”
Medical image segmentation using deep learning: A survey
Wang, R., Lei, T., Cui, R., Zhang, B., Meng, H., & Nandi, A. K. (2022) · IET Image Processing · doi:10.1049/ipr2.12419 · Cited by 947 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Segmentation algorithms are crucial in imaging analysis, helping to isolate and analyze specific areas within medical images for more accurate diagnoses (Wang et al., 2022).”
Machine-learning-based disease diagnosis: a comprehensive review
Ahsan, M. M., Luna, S. A., & Siddique, Z. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10030541 · Cited by 603 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Machine learning algorithms, for instance, are instrumental in identifying patterns and insights from large datasets, enabling the prediction of disease progression and response to treatments (Ahsan et al., 2022).”
BioMistral: A Collection of Open-Source Pretrained Large Language Models for Medical Domains
Labrak, Y., Bazoge, A., Morin, E., et al. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.10373 · Cited by 584 · cited 1×
“The evaluation of medical students is a rigorous process and other studies (Labrak et al., 2024) have also followed a simulated approach of the OSCE to evaluate LLMs in diagnostic tasks.”
What is AI? Applications of artificial intelligence to dermatology
Du‐Harpur, X., Watt, F. M., Luscombe, N. M., & Lynch, M. D. (2020) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.18880 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
(2004) · doi:10.3115/1220355.1220427 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology Image Analysis: Current Developments and Future Trends
Li, Z., Koban, K. C., Schenck, T. L., Giunta, R. E., Li, Q., & Sun, Y. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11226826 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Machine Learning in Dermatology: Current Applications, Opportunities, and Limitations
Chan, S. Y., Reddy, V. D., Myers, B. A., Thibodeaux, Q. G., Brownstone, N. D., & Liao, W. J. (2020) · Dermatology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13555-020-00372-0 · Cited by 275 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Machine learning (ML), particularly its sub-field of deep learning (DL), has become increasingly popular in dermatology due to its ability to learn from large datasets of skin images (Chan et al., 2020; Du et al., 2020; Hogarty et al., 2020).”
Anand, V., Gupta, S., Koundal, D., & Singh, K. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119230 · Cited by 261 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In skin lesion segmentation, U-Net, a CNN variant, has shown particular efficiency in handling medical images with fewer data samples (Iranpoor et al., 2020; Anand et al., 2023).”
Qin, L., Kırıkkaleli, D., Hou, Y., Miao, X., & Tufail, M. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113119 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: Challenges and Perspectives
Liopyris, K., Gregoriou, S., Dias, J., & Stratigos, A. (2022) · Dermatology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13555-022-00833-8 · Cited by 195 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These algorithms, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown proficiency in identifying patterns and features in images that may be subtle or invisible to the human eye (Liopyris et al., 2022).”
Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology—Where We Are and the Way to the Future: A Review
Hogarty, D. T., Su, J. C., Phan, K. H., Attia, M., Hossny, M., Nahavandi, S., Lenane, P., Moloney, F. J., & Yazdabadi, A. (2019) · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology · doi:10.1007/s40257-019-00462-6 · Cited by 186 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Machine learning (ML), particularly its sub-field of deep learning (DL), has become increasingly popular in dermatology due to its ability to learn from large datasets of skin images (Chan et al., 2020; Du et al., 2020; Hogarty et al., 2020).”
First Prospective Study of the Recognition Process of Melanoma in Dermatological Practice
Gachon, J., Beaulieu, P., Séi, J. ‐., Gouvernet, J., Claudel, J. P., Maître, M. L., Richard, M. A., & Grob, J. (2005) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.141.4.434 · Cited by 181 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The process of diagnosing a skin lesion or condition by dermatologists involves several key steps and requires a thorough consideration and evaluation approach (Marwaha et al., 2019; Gachon et al., 2005).”
The epidemiology of skin conditions in the aged: A systematic review
Hahnel, E., Lichterfeld, A., Blume‐Peytavi, U., & Kottner, J. (2016) · Journal of Tissue Viability · doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2016.04.001 · Cited by 174 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Dermatological conditions (Kerr et al., 2010; Hahnel et al., 2017; Hay et al., 2014) can be broadly categorized into several types, including, but not limited to: 1.”
Program, T. (2018) · Definitions · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_87 · Cited by 153
Automatic segmentation of dermoscopy images using saliency combined with Otsu threshold
Fan, H., Xie, F., Yang, L., Jiang, Z., & Liu, J. (2017) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.03.025 · Cited by 140 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Techniques such as Otsu’s method or K -means clustering have been widely used for segmenting skin lesions from healthy skin based on color and texture differences (Fan et al., 2017).”
Artificial Intelligence and User Experience in reciprocity: Contributions and state of the art
Virvou, M. K. (2023) · Intelligent Decision Technologies · doi:10.3233/idt-230092 · Cited by 137 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, in order to navigate through the complexity of the medical field effectively, a multifaceted approach is essential that integrates several AI technologies including explainability (Panagou-lias et al., 2024b), trustworthiness and holistic evaluation properties (Virvou, 2023).”
Self-citationMajumder, M. A. A., Kumar, A., Krishnamurthy, K., Ojeh, N. O., Adams, O. P., & Sa, B. (2019) · Advances in Medical Education and Practice · doi:10.2147/amep.s197275 · Cited by 134 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…medical education, a diverse range of assessment methods supplements Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and multiple-choice quizzes (MCQs) to comprehensively evaluate medical students (Majumder et al., 2019; Vanderbilt et al., 2013; Norcini & McKinley, 2007; Ferris & O’Flynn, 2015).”
Sloan, D., Donnelly, M., Schwartz, R. W., et al. (1996) · doi:10.1006/jsre.1996.0252 · Cited by 128
Clinical ABCDE rule for early melanoma detection
Duarte, A. F., Sousa‐Pinto, B., Azevedo, L. F., Barros, A. M., Puig, S., Malvehy, J., Haneke, E., & Correia, O. (2021) · European Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1684/ejd.2021.4171 · Cited by 96 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The most common rule used for evaluating a skin lesion, is the following ABCDE rule (Ring et al., 2021; Duarte et al., 2021), which, however, is considered as a guideline and not as a diagnosis tool.”
The profile of dermatological problems in primary care
Kerr, O., Tidman, M., Walker, J., et al. (2010) · Clincal and Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03586.x · Cited by 88 · cited 1×
“Dermatological conditions (Kerr et al., 2010; Hahnel et al., 2017; Hay et al., 2014) can be broadly categorized into several types, including, but not limited to: 1.”
Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks
Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.10084 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Assessment in Medical Education; What Are We Trying to Achieve?
Ferris, H. A., & Flynn, D. O. (2015) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p139 · Cited by 82 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…medical education, a diverse range of assessment methods supplements Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and multiple-choice quizzes (MCQs) to comprehensively evaluate medical students (Majumder et al., 2019; Vanderbilt et al., 2013; Norcini & McKinley, 2007; Ferris & O’Flynn, 2015).”
Setiawan, A. W. (2020) · CENiM · doi:10.1109/cenim51130.2020.9297970 · Cited by 81 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This suggests the combination of Otsu’s thresholding method with the GrabCut algorithm (Setiawan, 2020) to accurately delineate the le-sion’s boundaries.”
Panagoulias, D. P., Virvou, M. K., & Tsihrintzis, G. A. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123375 · Cited by 78 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the premise of evaluating multi-modal LLMs in the medical domain, we have also constructed an evaluation pipeline based on images and/or text (Panagoulias et al., 2024a, 2023b).”
Self-citationSiT: Self-supervised vIsion Transformer
Atito, S., Awais, M., & Kittler, J. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.03602 · Cited by 75 · cited 1× · see citing works
“During training (Atito et al., 2021), ViTs learn to identify features and patterns within the patches, leveraging the self-attention mechanism to understand the context and relationships between different parts of an image (Yuan et al., 2021; Zhai et al., 2022).”
Assessment in undergraduate medical education: a review of course exams
Vanderbilt, A. A., Feldman, M., & Wood, I. (2013) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.3402/meo.v18i0.20438 · Cited by 62 · cited 1×
“…medical education, a diverse range of assessment methods supplements Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and multiple-choice quizzes (MCQs) to comprehensively evaluate medical students (Majumder et al., 2019; Vanderbilt et al., 2013; Norcini & McKinley, 2007; Ferris & O’Flynn, 2015).”
Evaluating LLM - Generated Multimodal Diagnosis from Medical Images and Symptom AnalysisPreprint
Panagoulias, D., Virvou, M., & Tsihrintzis, G. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.01730 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial intelligence in dermatology for the clinician
Patel, S., Wang, J. V., Motaparthi, K., & Lee, J. B. (2021) · Clinics in Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.03.012 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Marwaha, S. S., Fevrier, H., Alexeeff, S., Crowley, E., Haiman, M., Pham, N., Tuerk, M. J., Wukda, D., Hartmann, M., & Herrinton, L. J. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.067 · Cited by 44 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The process of diagnosing a skin lesion or condition by dermatologists involves several key steps and requires a thorough consideration and evaluation approach (Marwaha et al., 2019; Gachon et al., 2005).”
Ring, C., Cox, N., & Lee, J. B. (2021) · Clinical Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.03.009 · Cited by 43 · cited 1×
“The most common rule used for evaluating a skin lesion, is the following ABCDE rule (Ring et al., 2021; Duarte et al., 2021), which, however, is considered as a guideline and not as a diagnosis tool.”
Review of Machine Learning in Predicting Dermatological Outcomes
Du, A., Emam, S., & Gniadecki, R. (2020) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.00266 · Cited by 42 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Machine learning (ML), particularly its sub-field of deep learning (DL), has become increasingly popular in dermatology due to its ability to learn from large datasets of skin images (Chan et al., 2020; Du et al., 2020; Hogarty et al., 2020).”
Evaluating the Potential of LLMs and ChatGPT on Medical Diagnosis and Treatment
Panagoulias, D. P., Palamidas, F. A., Virvou, M. K., & Tsihrintzis, G. A. (2023) · International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) · doi:10.1109/iisa59645.2023.10345968 · Cited by 33 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In the premise of evaluating multi-modal LLMs in the medical domain, we have also constructed an evaluation pipeline based on images and/or text (Panagoulias et al., 2024a, 2023b).”
Self-citationSkin lesion segmentation using convolutional neural networks with improved U-Net architecture
Iranpoor, R., Mahboob, A. S., Shahbandegan, S., & Baniasadi, N. (2020) · Iranian Conference on Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems (ICSPIS) · doi:10.1109/icspis51611.2020.9349577 · Cited by 26 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In skin lesion segmentation, U-Net, a CNN variant, has shown particular efficiency in handling medical images with fewer data samples (Iranpoor et al., 2020; Anand et al., 2023).”
Panagoulias, D. P., Palamidas, F. A., Virvou, M. K., & Tsihrintzis, G. A. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) · doi:10.1109/ictai59109.2023.00018 · Cited by 22 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In the premise of evaluating multi-modal LLMs in the medical domain, we have also constructed an evaluation pipeline based on images and/or text (Panagoulias et al., 2024a, 2023b).”
Self-citationSciNER: Extracting Named Entities from Scientific Literature
Hong, Z., Tchoua, R., Chard, K., & Foster, I. T. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50417-5_23 · Cited by 21 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Named Entity Recognition (NER) (Nadeau & Sekine, 2007; Hong et al., 2020) is a sub-field of NLP and information retrieval.”
Object Localization improved GrabCut for Lung Parenchyma Segmentation
Zhang, S.-C., Zhao, Y., & Bai, P.-C. (2018) · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.330 · Cited by 12 · cited 1×
“The segmentation process involves the use of the “apply otsu and grabcut refined” function (Zhang et al., 2018).”
Towards ‘interpretable’ artificial intelligence for dermatology
Rotemberg, V., & Halpern, A. (2019) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.18038 · Cited by 5
Knowledge Space reduction via Sequential Language Model Integration
Panagoulias, D. P., Virvou, M. K., & Tsihrintzis, G. A. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.544 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the premise of evaluating multi-modal LLMs in the medical domain, we have also constructed an evaluation pipeline based on images and/or text (Panagoulias et al., 2024a, 2023b).”
Self-citationBERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bradski, G., Kaehler, A. et al. (2000). Opencv. Dr. Dobb's journal of software tools, 3 .
- Zhai, X., Kolesnikov, A., Houlsby, N., & Beyer, L. (2022). Scaling vision trans- formers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 12104-12113).
- Zhang*, T., Kishore*, V., Wu*, F., Weinberger, K. Q., & Artzi, Y. (2020). Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert. In International Con- ference on Learning Representations. URL: https://openreview.net/ forum?id=SkeHuCVFDr.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rapid review: Growing usage of Multimodal Large Language Models in healthcare
Gupta, P., Zhang, Z., Song, M., Michalowski, M., Hu, X., Štiglic, G., & Topaz, M. (2025) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104875 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Knowledge Space reduction via Sequential Language Model Integration
Panagoulias, D. P., Virvou, M. K., & Tsihrintzis, G. A. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.544 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationRevolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review
Rammal, R., Mohy U Din, A., & Alam, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1614681 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Panagoulias et al. (32) created Dermacen Analytica, an improved AI model based on machine learning that can help teledermatology doctors do better diagnoses.”
- Authors
- Panagoulias, D. P., Tsoureli-Nikita, E., Virvou, M., & Tsihrintzis, G. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Piraeus (GR)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2403.14243
- OpenAlex
- W4393118724
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Piraeus Research Centre
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- teledermatology, skin lesion diagnosis, large language models, multimodal large language models, dermatological image analysis, cross-model validation, natural language inference, expert evaluation, teleconsultation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review