PreprintCited by 3Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Dermacen Analytica: A novel methodology integrating multi-modal large language models with machine learning in tele-dermatology

Open access
Panagoulias, Dimitrios P., Tsoureli-Nikita, Evridiki, Virvou, Maria, Tsihrintzis, George A.·2024·arXiv

Abstract

The rise of Artificial Intelligence creates great promise in the field of medical discovery, diagnostics and patient management. However, the vast complexity of all medical domains require a more complex approach that combines machine learning algorithms, classifiers, segmentation algorithms and, lately, large language models. In this paper, we describe, implement and assess an Artificial Intelligence-empowered system and methodology aimed at assisting the diagnosis process of skin lesions and other skin conditions within the field of dermatology that aims to holistically address the diagnostic process in this domain. The workflow integrates large language, transformer-based vision models and sophisticated machine learning tools. This holistic approach achieves a nuanced interpretation of dermatological conditions that simulates and facilitates a dermatologist's workflow. We assess our proposed methodology through a thorough cross-model validation technique embedded in an evaluation pipeline that utilizes publicly available medical case studies of skin conditions and relevant images. To quantitatively score the system performance, advanced machine learning and natural language processing tools are employed which focus on similarity comparison and natural language inference. Additionally, we incorporate a human expert evaluation process based on a structured checklist to further validate our results. We implemented the proposed methodology in a system which achieved approximate (weighted) scores of 0.87 for both contextual understanding and diagnostic accuracy, demonstrating the efficacy of our approach in enhancing dermatological analysis. The proposed methodology is expected to prove useful in the development of next-generation tele-dermatology applications, enhancing remote consultation capabilities and access to care, especially in underserved areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2403.14243

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Panagoulias et al.'s Dermacen Analytica achieved a mean score of 0.87 for context and diagnostic information.

    “The system achieved a mean score of 0.87 for context and diagnostic information.”

    From Revolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Evaluation Methodology section assesses context and diagnosis, supporting the claim that the system was scored on both. But the results passage (ABCDE Approximation; page unavailable) reports textual-similarity scores of 0.71 for context and 0.68 for diagnoses, not a mean score of 0.87; a search for 0.87 found no matching passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Panagoulias et al. presented Dermacen Analytica in teledermatology, which achieved diagnostic accuracy of 0.87 and context understanding, although it has not been tested on a small part of skin diseases.

    “Panagoulias et al. (32) presented Dermacen Analytica in teledermatology, which achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 0.87 and context understanding, although it has not been tested on a small part of skin diseases.”

    From Revolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Introduction presents Dermacen Analytica as a teledermatology workflow, and the evaluation passages report dermatological reasoning, diagnoses, and analysis of image-and-symptom context. However, our copy does not report diagnostic accuracy of 0.87; it gives textual-similarity scores of 0.71 for context and 0.68 for diagnoses. The Additional information section says the evaluation used 72 images, but does not establish the claimed limitation about a small part of skin diseases. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bradski, G., Kaehler, A. et al. (2000). Opencv. Dr. Dobb's journal of software tools, 3 .
  2. Zhai, X., Kolesnikov, A., Houlsby, N., & Beyer, L. (2022). Scaling vision trans- formers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 12104-12113).
  3. Zhang*, T., Kishore*, V., Wu*, F., Weinberger, K. Q., & Artzi, Y. (2020). Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert. In International Con- ference on Learning Representations. URL: https://openreview.net/ forum?id=SkeHuCVFDr.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panagoulias, D. P., Tsoureli-Nikita, E., Virvou, M., & Tsihrintzis, G. A.
Affiliations
University of Piraeus (GR)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393118724
Cited by
3
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
University of Piraeus Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
teledermatology, skin lesion diagnosis, large language models, multimodal large language models, dermatological image analysis, cross-model validation, natural language inference, expert evaluation, teleconsultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review