Cited by 53Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

Ideas and perspectives: Synergies from co-deployment of negative emission technologies

Open access
Amann, Thorben, Hartmann, Jens·2019·Biogeosciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Numerous publications propose the deployment of negative emission technologies, which intend to actively remove CO 2 from the atmosphere with the goal to reach the 1.5 ∘ target as discussed by the IPCC. The increasing number of scientific studies on the individual potential of different envisaged technologies and methods indicates that no single method has enough capacities to mitigate the issue by itself. It is thus expected that technology portfolios are deployed. As some of them utilize the same environmental compartment, co-deployment effects are expected. Those effects are particularly important to evaluate with respect to additional CO 2 uptake. Considering soils as one of the main affected compartments, we see a plethora of processes which can positively benefit from each other, canceling out negative side effects or increasing overall CO 2 sequestration potentials. To derive more reliable estimates of negative emission potentials and to evaluate common effects on global carbon pools, it is now necessary to intensively study interrelated effects of negative emission technology deployment while minimizing negative side effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/bg-16-2949-2019

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Co-deployment of ERW with feedstock crops for BECCS and biochar could enhance the feasibility and carbon sequestration potential of these strategies.

    “Co-deployment of ERW with feedstock crops for BECCS and biochar could enhance the feasibility and carbon sequestration potential of these strategies 4,26 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-500 Manuscript under review for journal Biogeosciences Discussion started: 13 December 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. · DOI
  2. Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-500 Manuscript under review for journal Biogeosciences Discussion started: 13 December 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. · DOI
  3. Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-500 Manuscript under review for journal Biogeosciences Discussion started: 13 December 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. · DOI
  4. Körner, C., Morgan, J., and Norby, R.: CO2 Fertilization: When, Where, How Much?, in: errestrial Ecosystems in a Changing World. Global Change -The IGBP Series, edited by: Canadell, J. G., Pataki, D. E., and Pitelka, L. F., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007.
  5. Masiello, C., Dugan, B., Brewer, C., Spokas, K., Novak, J.-J., Liu, Z., and Sorrenti, G.: Biochar effects on soil hydrology, in: Biochar for Environmental Management Science, Technology and Implementation, edited by: Lehmann, J., and Joseph, S., 30 Routledge, 2015.
  6. National Research Council: Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration, The National 10 Academies Press, Washington, DC, 154 pp., 2015.
  7. Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-500 Manuscript under review for journal Biogeosciences Discussion started: 13 December 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amann, T., & Hartmann, J.
Affiliations
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Amann, Thorben
Venue
Biogeosciences
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
16
Issue
15
Pages
2949-2960
ISSN
  • 1726-4170 (ISSN-L)
  • 1726-4189
OpenAlex
W2905487440
Cited by
53
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biogeosciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP1689, EXC177, EXC2037)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Keywords
negative emissions technologies, soil carbon sequestration, CO2 uptake, technology portfolio, synergistic effect, 1.5°C target, carbon cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review